James Toney vs ?

[IronDanHamza]

Its works because Joshua is the weakest fighter on that list, and Toney never lost 9 in a row

How could you possibly think that that is a good argument, It works because AJ is the weakest link? How does that work? That's not even remotely logical and has nothing to do with the (flawed) reasoning you've attempted to present.

I'll explain it so it's easier for an idiot like you to understand, your argument is AJ lost as an underdog therefore Toney wins despite the fact Toney lost to underdogs MULTIPLE TIMES. Hence why it doesn't work because your argument for why AJ loses also applies to Toney.

Secondly, when did AJ lose 9 in a row? What are you talking about?

[djtmal]

your argument is AJ lost as an underdog therefore Toney wins despite the fact Toney lost to underdogs MULTIPLE TIMES. Hence why it doesn't work because your argument for why AJ loses also applies to Toney.

So if they both lost to underdogs its a 50-50 fight. The Toney who just came off the Jirov win not the old fat badly faded one you want to use.

Joshua would get schooled bad he's a Eurobum.

[IronDanHamza]

So if they both lost to underdogs its a 50-50 fight.

Well no, that's not how it works.

But let's just pretend this idiocy does for a moment, AJ failed to beat a big underdog once. Unlike Toney who failed to beat big underdog multiple times.

And the time AJ failed to beat a big underdog, it was against a guy ranked in the Top 10 at HW. Unlike Toney who failed to beat literal journeyman, unranked journeyman, multiple times.

So if anything by that flawed logic it's not 50-50.

But again, irrelevant.

On every single metric you could use, AJ vs Toney at HW is massively favoured to AJ because Toney as a HW is total garbage.

Toney who just came off the Jirov win not the old fat badly faded one you want to use.

Joshua would get schooled bad he's a Eurobum.

Well that was at Crusierweight, not HW. So you can't use that version because it's not the HW version. It astounds me that you can't understand these extremely basic concepts.

[djtmal]

Well no, that's not how it works.

Well its working for me.

Out of that list, I give the best heavy version of Toney a shot against Tua and Joshua.

[djtmal]

Well that was at Crusierweight, not HW. So you can't use that version because it's not the HW version.

He moved up to heavyweight in his next fight after Jirov.

[IronDanHamza]

He moved up to heavyweight in his next fight after Jirov.

Ok so not the HW version, is it.

That's the Cruiserweight version.

Unless you'd like to match up a 200 lb Toney vs AJ then go ahead and make a thread on that.

[IronDanHamza]

Well its working for me.

Out of that list, I give the best heavy version of Toney a shot against Tua and Joshua.

I know, because you're an idiot.

Your argument doesn't work. That's an objective fact.

The same argument you've presented for why AJ loses can literally also be used the other way round therefore does not work.

I don't know how to make that easier for you to understand.

[djtmal]

Your argument doesn't work. That's an objective fact.

I am not arguing with anyone.

Its a fact that when Joshua got hit back he lost

[IronDanHamza]

I am not arguing with anyone.

Its a fact that when Joshua got hit back he lost

Ok and it's fact that when James Toney got hit back by unranked journeyman he lost.

Hence, NOT AN ARGUMENT you retard.

[djtmal]

Ok so not the HW version, is it.

That's the Cruiserweight version.

Can you read I said give me the Toney coming off the Jirov win