Originally posted by hugh grant
View Post
You could say Beterbiev was wasteful, or Bivol defended well, hence Beterbiev landing at a much lower %, and being outlanded, meaning his aggression wasn't that effective afterall. Does higher work rate count as much when you're not landing at a higher % because your opponent is using skill not to let you?
That's why people say its subjective. However I think if you're being outlanded and landing at a much lower % then you haven't been that effective with your aggression. It's not that subjective to me.
Comment