Depends how you look at it. Are we not accounting for good defence? Surely judges have to consider that
You could say Beterbiev was wasteful, or Bivol defended well, hence Beterbiev landing at a much lower %, and being outlanded, meaning his aggression wasn't that effective afterall. Does higher work rate count as much when you're not landing at a higher % because your opponent is using skill not to let you?
That's why people say its subjective. However I think if you're being outlanded and landing at a much lower % then you haven't been that effective with your aggression. It's not that subjective to me.
You could say Beterbiev was wasteful, or Bivol defended well, hence Beterbiev landing at a much lower %, and being outlanded, meaning his aggression wasn't that effective afterall. Does higher work rate count as much when you're not landing at a higher % because your opponent is using skill not to let you?
That's why people say its subjective. However I think if you're being outlanded and landing at a much lower % then you haven't been that effective with your aggression. It's not that subjective to me.
Comment