Comments Thread For: Anthony Joshua's Revenge: Challenger Denying 'Idiot' Tyson Fury's Undisputed Title Dream

[Willow The Wisp]

No, not at all. Fury jittered, poked and bounced around for 12 miserable rounds. Only you and his gypsy cousins think much of it. AJ went to war with Wlad and beat him down.

Definitely a more exciting fight between two fragile chinned heavyweight greats, but it's needless to say that Fury controlled the fight better.

[Willow The Wisp]

Joshua - DDD winner will only be a paper champion. With the belt their daddy threw in the trash.

Linial champion goes in the books. Beltholders are just an asterisk.

[IRONCHINHAGLER]

Wilder and Fury don't have good resume. I have said as much plenty of times. It's just that Joshua's isn't exactly miles better either.

And I never stated Wlad has been out for two years. But 18 months out of the ring is ALOT. and anyone pretending otherwise is an idiot. And no one claims Wlad was a better version of himself, please quote where anyone says that. Oh right you won't. And as someone who ACTUALLY boxes, I take thr opinions of those who've been in the ring not the dumbasses who watch it.

Watch the HBO Aj/Wlad fight and listen to the commentators say exactly that’s about Wlad No need to quote anything. And going by your comments of resumes of the three top Hw of the recent era - AJ has the best resume - correct? Which was the point from the beginning!!

[baroidi]

This era's HW is weak, that's why a CW beat the supposed top 2 HWs with such ease.

[Willow The Wisp]

This era's HW is weak, that's why a CW beat the supposed top 2 HWs with such ease.

No, no young feller. It's a great heavyweight era! There's some beasts been fighting these days.

[pollywog]

No, no young feller. It's a great heavyweight era! There's some beasts been fighting these days.

Yep...today's boxers are far better trained and conditioned based on improved methods and diets.

Todays boxers fight smarter and just as hard as them old schoolers but id still like to see the return of 15 rounders.