Comments Thread For: Matchroom Nearing Replacement to Match With 'Boots' Ennis

[IronDanHamza]

Terence Crawford:
W vs #3 Ricky Burns UD 12 (fmr. WBO 130; reigning WBO 135; future WBA 140)
W vs #7 Yuriorkis Gamboa TKO 9 (fmr. WBA/IBF 126)
W vs #2 Raymundo Beltran UD 12 (future WBO 135)
W vs #9 Thomas Dulorme TKO 6
W vs #1 Viktor Postol UD 12 (reigning WBC 140)
W vs #3 John Molina TKO 8
W vs #9 Felix Diaz RTD 10 (Diaz ranked at 147, fight at 140)
W vs #1 Julius Indongo KO 3 (reigning WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #4 Jeff Horn TKO 9 (reigning WBO 147)
W vs Amir Khan TKO 6 (fmr. WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #10 Egidijus Kavaliauskas TKO 9
W vs Kell Brook TKO 4 (fmr. IBF 147)
W vs #4 Shawn Porter TKO 10 (fmr. IBF 147; WBC 147)
W vs #9 David Avanesyan KO 6
W vs #1 Errol Spence Jr. TKO 9 (reigning WBA/WBC/IBF 147)

Other notable victories: Breidis Prescott, Andrey Klimov, Dierry Jean, Hank Lundy, Jose Benavidez Jr

13-0 vs top 10
8-0 vs top 5
4-0 vs #1 (or #2 if Crawford was #1)
10-0 vs fighters that won a legitimate world title
5-0 vs reigning world titlists
3-0 in unification fights
18-0 in world title fights
6-0 in lineal world championship fights
40-0-0-0 overall record, 31 KOs

135: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBO
140: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed
147: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed

3 division lineal world champion
2 division undisputed world champion
3 division world titlist

Failing to defend your position again, shock.

Lying about watching boxing back then, trying to pretend that Ray Beltran and Ricky Burns were elite fighters You're an embarrassment.

For what it's worth, I rate Crawford's resume. A lot more so than others do. And it's better than Inoue's.

But to try and act like the likes of Ricky Burns and Ray Beltran were part of an "excellent run" is embarrassing. Fake it long enough, your card will get pulled, let that be a lesson for you

[famicommander]

Failing to defend your position again, shock.

Lying about watching boxing back, then trying to pretend that Ray Beltran and Ricky Burns were elite fighters You're an embarrassment.

For what it's worth, I rate Crawford's resume. A lot more so than others do. And it's better than Inoue's.

But to try and act like the likes of Ricky Burns and Ray Beltran were part of an "excellent run" is embarrassing. Fake it long enough, your card will get pulled, let that be a lesson for you

I have literally watched every televised fight Crawford has ever had. It's just not worth engaging with you because you're mentally challenged and incapable of reading comprehension.

Burns and Beltran were both great wins at the time. That's why Beltran was for the lineal/TBRB/Ring championship, and it's why Beltran went on a winning streak and won the WBO title after the Crawford fight. Meanwhile, Burns moved up to 140 and won another belt after Crawford beat him.

[IronDanHamza]

I have literally watched every televised fight Crawford has ever had. It's just not worth engaging with you because you're mentally challenged and incapable of reading comprehension.

Burns and Beltran were both great wins at the time. That's why Beltran was for the lineal/TBRB/Ring championship, and it's why Beltran went on a winning streak and won the WBO title after the Crawford fight. Meanwhile, Burns moved up to 140 and won another belt after Crawford beat him.

Yeah, sure you have

No they really weren't "great wins" at all. Good wins? Yeah sure they were but they weren't some great, huge wins for Crawford.

Burns was a good win, because it was his first world title fight he did it in his backyard and it was his first real step up, even though he shouldn't have had the title because he lost to Beltran. So he gets credit for that, but it's still Ricky Burns at the end of the day, who is far from an elite fighter.

Beltran, a good win as he was robbed against Burns so he should have been world champion. But it's Ray Beltran. We know that he's obviously not an elite fighter. Or are you actually trying to argue that he is?

See, this is why I know you weren't watching boxing back then. I've just explained why Beltran was for the Lineage, because he was robbed against Burns as a massive underdog in what was meant to be a routine defence. You've now citied a "winning streak" and winning the WBO after losing to Crawford Are you serious mate? Who the hell did Beltran beat after he lost to Crawford of ANY note? He won his vacant WBO against someone who wasn't even ranked. Beating Ray Beltran is NOT a great win, it just flat out isn't. If you were watching boxing at the time, you would know that.

Now move on to Ricky Burns. Someone who was working part time in Sports Direct on the weekends whilst he was a world champion Was never expected to come close to a world title in his career, and to his credit, he massively overachieved in his career and he had some very solid wins and he deserves credit for that.

You've cited there that he "moved up and won another belt", yeah..against who? Another case of winning a vacant belt against an unranked fighter. It's the clearest indicator that you weren't watching boxing then for you to act like these are impressive feats when they're not. You've looked at it on paper and tried to (and incorrectly) connect the dots.

Crawford has some stellar, excellent wins. Ricky Burns and Ray Beltran aren't some of them. They are solid, at best. If you were watching boxing back then, you'd know that.

On top of that, you ignored the fact that that Lightweight division was comically weak at the time. The same criticism that you use when you dismiss Tyson Fury's wins over ranked opponents and deem them "bums". Why the double standard?

[famicommander]

Yeah, sure you have

No they really weren't "great wins" at all. Good wins? Yeah sure they were but they weren't some great, huge wins for Crawford.

Burns was a good win, because it was his first world title fight he did it in his backyard and it was his first real step up, even though he shouldn't have had the title because he lost to Beltran. So he gets credit for that, but it's still Ricky Burns at the end of the day, who is far from an elite fighter.

Beltran, a good win as he was robbed against Burns so he should have been world champion. But it's Ray Beltran. We know that he's obviously not an elite fighter. Or are you actually trying to argue that he is?

See, this is why I know you weren't watching boxing back then. I've just explained why Beltran was for the Lineage, because he was robbed against Burns as a massive underdog in what was meant to be a routine defence. You've now citied a "winning streak" and winning the WBO after losing to Crawford Are you serious mate? Who the hell did Beltran beat after he lost to Crawford of ANY note? He won his vacant WBO against someone who wasn't even ranked. Beating Ray Beltran is NOT a great win, it just flat out isn't. If you were watching boxing at the time, you would know that.

Now move on to Ricky Burns. Someone who was working part time in Sports Direct on the weekends whilst he was a world champion Was never expected to come close to a world title in his career, and to his credit, he massively overachieved in his career and he had some very solid wins and he deserves credit for that.

You've cited there that he "moved up and won another belt", yeah..against who? Another case of winning a vacant belt against an unranked fighter. It's the clearest indicator that you weren't watching boxing then for you to act like these are impressive feats when they're not. You've looked at it on paper and tried to (and incorrectly) connect the dots.

Crawford has some stellar, excellent wins. Ricky Burns and Ray Beltran aren't some of them. They are solid, at best. If you were watching boxing back then, you'd know that.

On top of that, you ignored the fact that that Lightweight division was comically weak at the time. The same criticism that you use when you dismiss Tyson Fury's wins over ranked opponents and deem them "bums". Why the double standard?

Terence Crawford:
W vs #3 Ricky Burns UD 12 (fmr. WBO 130; reigning WBO 135; future WBA 140)
W vs #7 Yuriorkis Gamboa TKO 9 (fmr. WBA/IBF 126)
W vs #2 Raymundo Beltran UD 12 (future WBO 135)
W vs #9 Thomas Dulorme TKO 6
W vs #1 Viktor Postol UD 12 (reigning WBC 140)
W vs #3 John Molina TKO 8
W vs #9 Felix Diaz RTD 10 (Diaz ranked at 147, fight at 140)
W vs #1 Julius Indongo KO 3 (reigning WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #4 Jeff Horn TKO 9 (reigning WBO 147)
W vs Amir Khan TKO 6 (fmr. WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #10 Egidijus Kavaliauskas TKO 9
W vs Kell Brook TKO 4 (fmr. IBF 147)
W vs #4 Shawn Porter TKO 10 (fmr. IBF 147; WBC 147)
W vs #9 David Avanesyan KO 6
W vs #1 Errol Spence Jr. TKO 9 (reigning WBA/WBC/IBF 147)

Other notable victories: Breidis Prescott, Andrey Klimov, Dierry Jean, Hank Lundy, Jose Benavidez Jr

13-0 vs top 10
8-0 vs top 5
4-0 vs #1 (or #2 if Crawford was #1)
10-0 vs fighters that won a legitimate world title
5-0 vs reigning world titlists
3-0 in unification fights
18-0 in world title fights
6-0 in lineal world championship fights
40-0-0-0 overall record, 31 KOs

135: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBO
140: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed
147: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed

3 division lineal world champion
2 division undisputed world champion
3 division world titlist

[IronDanHamza]

Terence Crawford:
W vs #3 Ricky Burns UD 12 (fmr. WBO 130; reigning WBO 135; future WBA 140)
W vs #7 Yuriorkis Gamboa TKO 9 (fmr. WBA/IBF 126)
W vs #2 Raymundo Beltran UD 12 (future WBO 135)
W vs #9 Thomas Dulorme TKO 6
W vs #1 Viktor Postol UD 12 (reigning WBC 140)
W vs #3 John Molina TKO 8
W vs #9 Felix Diaz RTD 10 (Diaz ranked at 147, fight at 140)
W vs #1 Julius Indongo KO 3 (reigning WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #4 Jeff Horn TKO 9 (reigning WBO 147)
W vs Amir Khan TKO 6 (fmr. WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #10 Egidijus Kavaliauskas TKO 9
W vs Kell Brook TKO 4 (fmr. IBF 147)
W vs #4 Shawn Porter TKO 10 (fmr. IBF 147; WBC 147)
W vs #9 David Avanesyan KO 6
W vs #1 Errol Spence Jr. TKO 9 (reigning WBA/WBC/IBF 147)

Other notable victories: Breidis Prescott, Andrey Klimov, Dierry Jean, Hank Lundy, Jose Benavidez Jr

13-0 vs top 10
8-0 vs top 5
4-0 vs #1 (or #2 if Crawford was #1)
10-0 vs fighters that won a legitimate world title
5-0 vs reigning world titlists
3-0 in unification fights
18-0 in world title fights
6-0 in lineal world championship fights
40-0-0-0 overall record, 31 KOs

135: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBO
140: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed
147: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed

3 division lineal world champion
2 division undisputed world champion
3 division world titlist

You're talking about reading comprehension, which is laughably ironic to be honest, then post Crawford's resume again for no reason what so ever, the same resume that I have clearly stated that I rate.

Do you not get bored of looking like the joke that you are?

Here's some advice, since I've already pulled your card once today for lying about watching boxing during that time when it's abundantly clear you weren't. If you take a position, either defend it or shut the fuck up. It will save you further embarrassment.

[famicommander]

You're talking about reading comprehension, which is laughably ironic to be honest, then post Crawford's resume again for no reason what so ever, the same resume that I have clearly stated that I rate.

Do you not get bored of looking like the joke that you are?

Here's some advice, since I've already pulled your card once today for lying about watching boxing during that time when it's abundantly clear you weren't. If you take a position, either defend it or shut the fuck up. It will save you further embarrassment.

There's absolutely a reason I posted it.

It's because I know it annoys you and it's not at all worth my time to engage you on any level above this. You're an obsessive clown and you seem to think everyone else on this site is keeping score in some imaginary contest, but in reality nobody cares about any of this at all.

[IronDanHamza]

There's absolutely a reason I posted it.

It's because I know it annoys you and it's not at all worth my time to engage you on any level above this. You're an obsessive clown and you seem to think everyone else on this site is keeping score in some imaginary contest, but in reality nobody cares about any of this at all.

Legitimately couldn't annoy me any less The fact you think it would is so embarrassing it's cringe worthy.

I go by rankings. I've been going by rankings for fighters for decades before you started watching boxing in 2018.

Unlike you, though, I don't pick and chose when they matter. I don't deem a fighter a "great win" because he was ranked highly then also deem another fighter that's ranked in the same position a "bum". That's what I call you out on. Not the actual usage of rankings.

You sending me a fighters resume, one I've stated twice that I rate, just makes you look somehow even more dumb than you already do.

"Not worth your time to engage" All you fuckin do is engage on here all day. You only aren't "engaging" because you're getting called out and battered from pillar to post and know you can't defend your position.

[famicommander]

Legitimately couldn't annoy me any less The fact you think it would is so embarrassing it's cringe worthy.

I go by rankings. I've been going by rankings for fighters for decades before you started watching boxing in 2018.

Unlike you, though, I don't pick and chose when they matter. I don't deem a fighter a "great win" because he was ranked highly then also deem another fighter that's ranked in the same position a "bum". That's what I call you out on. Not the actual usage of rankings.

You sending me a fighters resume, one I've stated twice that I rate, just makes you look somehow even more dumb than you already do.

"Not worth your time to engage" All you fuckin do is engage on here all day. You only aren't "engaging" because you're getting called out and battered from pillar to post and know you can't defend your position.

Terence Crawford:
W vs #3 Ricky Burns UD 12 (fmr. WBO 130; reigning WBO 135; future WBA 140)
W vs #7 Yuriorkis Gamboa TKO 9 (fmr. WBA/IBF 126)
W vs #2 Raymundo Beltran UD 12 (future WBO 135)
W vs #9 Thomas Dulorme TKO 6
W vs #1 Viktor Postol UD 12 (reigning WBC 140)
W vs #3 John Molina TKO 8
W vs #9 Felix Diaz RTD 10 (Diaz ranked at 147, fight at 140)
W vs #1 Julius Indongo KO 3 (reigning WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #4 Jeff Horn TKO 9 (reigning WBO 147)
W vs Amir Khan TKO 6 (fmr. WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #10 Egidijus Kavaliauskas TKO 9
W vs Kell Brook TKO 4 (fmr. IBF 147)
W vs #4 Shawn Porter TKO 10 (fmr. IBF 147; WBC 147)
W vs #9 David Avanesyan KO 6
W vs #1 Errol Spence Jr. TKO 9 (reigning WBA/WBC/IBF 147)

Other notable victories: Breidis Prescott, Andrey Klimov, Dierry Jean, Hank Lundy, Jose Benavidez Jr

13-0 vs top 10
8-0 vs top 5
4-0 vs #1 (or #2 if Crawford was #1)
10-0 vs fighters that won a legitimate world title
5-0 vs reigning world titlists
3-0 in unification fights
18-0 in world title fights
6-0 in lineal world championship fights
40-0-0-0 overall record, 31 KOs

135: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBO
140: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed
147: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed

3 division lineal world champion
2 division undisputed world champion
3 division world titlist

[IronDanHamza]

Terence Crawford:
W vs #3 Ricky Burns UD 12 (fmr. WBO 130; reigning WBO 135; future WBA 140)
W vs #7 Yuriorkis Gamboa TKO 9 (fmr. WBA/IBF 126)
W vs #2 Raymundo Beltran UD 12 (future WBO 135)
W vs #9 Thomas Dulorme TKO 6
W vs #1 Viktor Postol UD 12 (reigning WBC 140)
W vs #3 John Molina TKO 8
W vs #9 Felix Diaz RTD 10 (Diaz ranked at 147, fight at 140)
W vs #1 Julius Indongo KO 3 (reigning WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #4 Jeff Horn TKO 9 (reigning WBO 147)
W vs Amir Khan TKO 6 (fmr. WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #10 Egidijus Kavaliauskas TKO 9
W vs Kell Brook TKO 4 (fmr. IBF 147)
W vs #4 Shawn Porter TKO 10 (fmr. IBF 147; WBC 147)
W vs #9 David Avanesyan KO 6
W vs #1 Errol Spence Jr. TKO 9 (reigning WBA/WBC/IBF 147)

Other notable victories: Breidis Prescott, Andrey Klimov, Dierry Jean, Hank Lundy, Jose Benavidez Jr

13-0 vs top 10
8-0 vs top 5
4-0 vs #1 (or #2 if Crawford was #1)
10-0 vs fighters that won a legitimate world title
5-0 vs reigning world titlists
3-0 in unification fights
18-0 in world title fights
6-0 in lineal world championship fights
40-0-0-0 overall record, 31 KOs

135: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBO
140: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed
147: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed

3 division lineal world champion
2 division undisputed world champion
3 division world titlist

Embarrassing.

Carry on lying about not being new to the sport you daft cunt

[famicommander]

Embarrassing.

Carry on lying about not being new to the sport you daft cunt

Terence Crawford:
W vs #3 Ricky Burns UD 12 (fmr. WBO 130; reigning WBO 135; future WBA 140)
W vs #7 Yuriorkis Gamboa TKO 9 (fmr. WBA/IBF 126)
W vs #2 Raymundo Beltran UD 12 (future WBO 135)
W vs #9 Thomas Dulorme TKO 6
W vs #1 Viktor Postol UD 12 (reigning WBC 140)
W vs #3 John Molina TKO 8
W vs #9 Felix Diaz RTD 10 (Diaz ranked at 147, fight at 140)
W vs #1 Julius Indongo KO 3 (reigning WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #4 Jeff Horn TKO 9 (reigning WBO 147)
W vs Amir Khan TKO 6 (fmr. WBA/IBF 140)
W vs #10 Egidijus Kavaliauskas TKO 9
W vs Kell Brook TKO 4 (fmr. IBF 147)
W vs #4 Shawn Porter TKO 10 (fmr. IBF 147; WBC 147)
W vs #9 David Avanesyan KO 6
W vs #1 Errol Spence Jr. TKO 9 (reigning WBA/WBC/IBF 147)

Other notable victories: Breidis Prescott, Andrey Klimov, Dierry Jean, Hank Lundy, Jose Benavidez Jr

13-0 vs top 10
8-0 vs top 5
4-0 vs #1 (or #2 if Crawford was #1)
10-0 vs fighters that won a legitimate world title
5-0 vs reigning world titlists
3-0 in unification fights
18-0 in world title fights
6-0 in lineal world championship fights
40-0-0-0 overall record, 31 KOs

135: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBO
140: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed
147: Lineal/TBRB, Ring, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO undisputed

3 division lineal world champion
2 division undisputed world champion
3 division world titlist