History won't be kind to Fury

[Dr. Z]

What are you talking about? Both Fury and Usyk have agreed to a rematch in October according to Warren

I lose track and relay do not pay attention to what Fury says. He is off and on, jerking the fans around. It Fury says it, that means just a little bit more the Warren.

[juggernaut666]

Smartest thing Fury ever did was make Joseph Parker his BFF so he'd never have to fight him.

Parker does to Fury what Usyk did but lays him out proper!

Except without Furys relative training Parker would he still be struggling against the Chisoras and Whyte level guys .

Parker isn’t Usyk though and couldn’t get to a Wilder to do much damage barring 4 or 5 solid power shots connecting and he was just standing in front of him for 12 rounds. Don’t see how he defeats Fury .


Fury best 5 wins are Klitchko , Wallin , Wilder , Whyte and Ngannou ? Idk but only Two guys have an actual impressive resume that’s Usyk and Joshua no one besides them because you also got to include title defenses not just opponents if were really talking who is going to put up there with past era top guys and that’s where it is right now .

[JakeTheBoxer]

History will be very kind to him.

From the guy that was punching himself in the face with uppercut to the world champ. He has 1 loss in competitive fight.

Fury and Wilder are the most entertaining hw guys in this era. Usyk is the most skilled one.

[N/A]

Just as fans aren't objective, so are the haters. Both cases would have been fine if they weren't the way they are. This thread is the bottom the OP can reach.

[TernceBudCharlo]

I'm not going to sit here and say Tyson Fury sucks, he's a great fighter, sure, but this weekend really should put to bed this narrative that the media and his fanboys push that he's better than Ali, nobody in the history of boxing can beat him because of his size, this that and the third.

I would not bet on Tyson Fury to beat Ali, Foreman, Frazier. Moving closer to the modern era I don't even think he would beat Lennox or Hollyfield. And moving closer I don't think he'd beat Vitali. Vitali was a master boxer with an iron chin, and wouldn't have been anywhere close to as tentative as his brother to pull the trigger. I think even Tyson has admitted this before.

[The plunger man]

[Pac=Duran]

Hot Damn! You sound like a computer nerd. Obviously you don’t know shit about boxing.

“Run through Ali’s resume like a hot knife through butter“? What are you ******? Are you serious?

Ali fought in the most competitive heavyweight division of all-time. Which is also considered the Golden era in the Heavyweight division; The 1960s and 1970s.

And he lost to Norton many times. And tiny light heavyweight joe frazier plus Leon Spinks.

Firy would have KOd everyone on Alis resume with ease, as well as Ali himself. They're Unskilled small men. George Foreman would have been a good fight for Fury but I don't think he wiuld have had the skill to land on Fury.

Foreman was just a 70s Wilder that couldnt even punch straight

[The plunger man]

Did Tyson Fury f*** Dr Z's wife or something?

Fury is the 2nd best HW of this era and has earned generational wealth, not bad for a bum who can't box.

no he ain’t and he hasn’t proved it….let him fight joshua before you once again talk false facts

[Dr. Z]

Just as fans aren't objective, so are the haters. Both cases would have been fine if they weren't the way they are. This thread is the bottom the OP can reach.

Well the truth is the truth no matter who it spins it. I do not think Fury is bad. Far from it. I think he was say the 3rd or 4th best heavyweight in down era of heavyweight boxing. And dirty. Kudos to punch drunk fans for paying for his for his PPV's. Boxing needed it.

[removed]

no he ain’t and he hasn’t proved it….let him fight joshua before you once again talk false facts

Fury is still levels above AJ