Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Manager: Lopez and Haney Beat Champions at 140 But They Couldn't Do Anything with Loma at 135

[Loque-san]

Hmmmm
Your mom says you better stop lying
She says she always knew you were a pos but now lying
Watch it she’ll put you back in the basement

I feel bad for your mom to be honest. Her son is an adult who writes and behaves like a mentally challenged teenager. If I show her this conversation, she'll have to take away your computer for a month once again.

[MulaKO]

I feel bad for your mom to be honest. Her son is an adult who writes and behaves like a mentally challenged teenager. If I show her this conversation, she'll have to take away your computer for a month once again.

Ohhhhh
You so bad
Are you being honest or are you lying again ?
****** fugh
Go shoot yourself and please make sure you don’t miss
Mom will be so happy
How high are you ?
LmFao

[N/A]

Klimas is quite a dumb f*** (so is Krassyuk, so maybe Loma is lucky he doesn't deal with both). No matter how good Loma is (maybe he isn't that good after all), he has at least two legit losses (close or not) and he always claims he's been robbed. The nonsense the puffy old f*g said this time is on another level.

[Loque-san]

Ohhhhh
You so bad
Ate you being honest or are you lying again ?
****** fugh
Go shoot yourself and please make sure you don’t miss
Mom will be so happy
How high are you ?
LmFao

Ok... so I have the confirmation right now... I'm gonna end this "conversation". I can't keep on making fun of a disabled individual like that. I'll let you have the last word for your mental health. Poor guy.

[Lance98]

I'm saying facts dumbass clown, you really rely on the fücking judges to score fights you delusional Retarded moron everybody knows loma got robbed against Haney but you sucking off Haney's **** won't admit it:****you:

The fact is haney beat loma. There is no robbery you ****** casual bum. Loma did not create any type of separation that suggests otherwise, got beaten up to the body and had to go to the hospital post fight while crying like a baby. Keep crying for me in this forum as well or just hush, child.

[Gaydrien Boner]

The fact is haney beat loma. There is no robbery you ****** casual bum. Loma did not create any type of separation that suggests otherwise, got beaten up to the body and had to go to the hospital post fight while crying like a baby. Keep crying for me in this forum as well or just hush, child.

Jesus Christ are you really slurping off Haney, your the casual bum clown here so why the **** would I lie??

[MulaKO]

Ok... so I have the confirmation right now... I'm gonna end this "conversation". I can't keep on making fun of a disabled individual like that. I'll let you have the last word for your mental health. Poor guy.

Why are you

Can you tell us why at least
Hatred or your man crush ?
Please try to be honest this time

[crimsonfalcon07]

Try to read what's been said before when you join an ongoing conversation. I said Salido landed a lot of low blows in the fight. My reply was about these five imaginary low blows you saw in the first round, that make you a lier.

Since you apparently need a reminder, here's what you said to start out:

You've just told one side of the story.

We may have had a clean fight had the referee enforced the rules early in the fight. Loma started the dirty tactics with non-stop clinching, then Salido reciprocated by going low. It was just a foul-filled fight that Loma lost

and yet Salido was the one to initiate the clinches that you said were illegal. Most of those clinches you claim Loma was responsible for, Loma is actually trying to disengage and Salido is holding on, such as Rd 2 0:02, Rd 3 2:30, etc.

The ref warned Loma for holding in Rd 3, after Loma had already disengaged, and Salido had tied Loma up 3 times to 1 just in that round without being warned even once. The commentators even assumed that Salido was the one being warned and had to correct themselves. By that point in the fight Salido had tied up 7 times to 3 from Loma, and held the arms on the tie up the only two times it happened. Are you really trying to use the one sided ref who ignored numerous fouls from Salido and called Loma on tying up for a brief second then immediately disengaging as evidence? Cole got called out by virtually every news outlet for his poor job, just the latest of many controversies for someone whose father was the boxing commissioner of the state. And here you are trying to use the corrupt actions of a notorious ref as evidence that Loma was fouling too?

ESPN wrote, "Cole warned him only once and did not seem too concerned" regarding low blows.

In an interview with The Ring Magazine, Laurence admitted that his performance in the fight "might not have been his 'A-game." and they noted "Cole came under fire for appearing to allow Salido to land an inordinate amount of low blows."

Boxing Insider wrote, "Of course Salido didn't exactly win the fight fair and square. The guy was about as dirty as they come on Saturday. He hit low and hit low consistently. Referee Laurence Cole didn't seem to notice, or to much care, so Salido whacked Lomachenko below the beltline throughout the entire bout..."

Boxing.com wrote, "Few referees have turned in a performance as bad as that which Laurence Cole blessed us with Saturday night in, inevitably, San Antonio, Texas" and "astonishingly bad performance" in its article. They have claimed that the referee Laurence Cole failed to enforce rules on clinching, pushing and blows below the belt. The site has also mentioned: "not only should this ridiculous excuse for a referee be sacked forthwith but the role of his father plays in allegedly consistently obtaining for him some of the biggest fights in Texas in his role with the Texan commission needs to be investigated."

Yahoo! Sports wrote that the fight was "poorly officiated by referee Laurence Cole, who missed numerous fouls and seemed to let anything go."

Bad Left Hook wrote, "Maligned Texas referee Laurence Cole's performance was roundly and rightly criticized for missing a metric ton of Salido's low blows, which landed on the thighs and hips mainly. And that mattered."

The Sweet Science wrote, "Holding and hitting, hitting on the break, low blows galore... Salido was aided by ref Laurence Cole who left his glasses at home."

What does Salido missing weight have to with the fouling in the fight? You're so emotional that you're going in all directions right now.

You really don't understand why missing weight is considered a foul? Do you just not understand the concept of weight divisions? Imagine being such an ignorant fanboy of SALIDO of all people.

This was a featherweight bout for which Salido came in as a WELTERWEIGHT, fully 11 pounds over Loma for fight night. If you don't understand that's deliberate cheating, you really are just an ignorant fanboy. The cheating from Salido started at the weigh in and continued for the whole fight.

Controversial split decision result aside, Salido was as dirty as it comes for that fight, and it's disingenuous to pretend that it was anything but one sided. The press coverage for that ensures that the historical record will show that you're alone in that delusion.

[Gaydrien Boner]

Since you apparently need a reminder, here's what you said to start out:


and yet Salido was the one to initiate the clinches that you said were illegal. Most of those clinches you claim Loma was responsible for, Loma is actually trying to disengage and Salido is holding on, such as Rd 2 0:02, Rd 3 2:30, etc.

The ref warned Loma for holding in Rd 3, after Loma had already disengaged, and Salido had tied Loma up 3 times to 1 just in that round without being warned even once. The commentators even assumed that Salido was the one being warned and had to correct themselves. By that point in the fight Salido had tied up 7 times to 3 from Loma, and held the arms on the tie up the only two times it happened. Are you really trying to use the one sided ref who ignored numerous fouls from Salido and called Loma on tying up for a brief second then immediately disengaging as evidence? Cole got called out by virtually every news outlet for his poor job, just the latest of many controversies for someone whose father was the boxing commissioner of the state. And here you are trying to use the corrupt actions of a notorious ref as evidence that Loma was fouling too?





You really don't understand why missing weight is considered a foul? Do you just not understand the concept of weight divisions? Imagine being such an ignorant fanboy of SALIDO of all people.

This was a featherweight bout for which Salido came in as a WELTERWEIGHT, fully 11 pounds over Loma for fight night. If you don't understand that's deliberate cheating, you really are just an ignorant fanboy. The cheating from Salido started at the weigh in and continued for the whole fight.

Controversial split decision result aside, Salido was as dirty as it comes for that fight, and it's disingenuous to pretend that it was anything but one sided. The press coverage for that ensures that the historical record will show that you're alone in that delusion.

Yup he's drunk or some ****

[Lance98]

Jesus Christ are you really slurping off Haney, your the casual bum clown here so why the **** would I lie??

You are slurping off loma and making excuses for him while I post facts, dummy. I bet you beat your meat to loma too, you sick miserable simp.