Comments Thread For: Conor Benn: I Decapitated Vargas, Van Heerden Better Than Boots and Vergil Ortiz - There's Your Measuring Stick!

[Boro]

Erm, yes, he LITERALLY did. You don’t understand how the due process works and think because the NADP made the decision it wasn’t a UKAD hearing when it was literally a UKAD hearing.

It’s on going because they APPEALED it. The appealed the decision of the hearing. The appeal date is this month. Once that’s done with, if the appeals rejected, there is no more that can happen. Because, the hearing has already happened.

It’s the equivalent to saying Amir Khan didn’t go through the process relating to UKAD, or Glowacki, or Tete, or ANYONE who’s ever had a hearing with them and won/lost because the NADP gave the verdict which is literally the process of the hearing

Are you retárded son, do you think an appeal in arbitration stops the process!? the appeal is the continuation of said process, engage your brain...

The process doesn't end and then start a new because you want to believe it does.

And no implied if it gets rejected there is anything more that can be done, i'm more than aware how arbitration works son.

I can't believe you are this naive, you're comparing apples to orange and you're quite frankly too retárded to even realise it with the Khan and co comment...

[IronDanHamza]

Are you retárded son, do you think an appeal in arbitration stops the process!? the appeal is the continuation of said process, engage your brain...

The process doesn't end and then start a new because you want to believe it does.

And no implied if it gets rejected there is anything more that can be done, i'm more than aware how arbitration works son.

I can't believe you are this naive, you're comparing apples to orange and you're quite frankly too retárded to even realise it with the Khan and co comment...

I didn’t say it ended the process. I said that it’s on going because they appealed the decision and once the appeal is concluded, if it’s rejected, then the process is done, which it is.

No, literally comparing apples to apples..

Conor Benn, Amir Khan, Glowacki, Tete and insert any other UKAD hearing that’s happened was held by the NADP. Thats how hearings work, that’s the structure.

Fighter fails drug test, fighter admits wrong doing and is given a ban via UKAD

or

Fighter fails drug test, fighter claims innocence (99% of cases hence why the UKAD website says “likely” in regards to NADP) hearing is scheduled with UKAD via the NADP, the NADP makes the decision.

Like I said, if you can’t understand how the hearing process works in the UK with UKAD via the NADP then I can’t make it any easier.

[dan-b]

I didn’t say it ended the process. I said that it’s on going because they appealed the decision and once the appeal is concluded, if it’s rejected, then the process is done, which it is.

No, literally comparing apples to apples..

Conor Benn, Amir Khan, Glowacki, Tete and insert any other UKAD hearing that’s happened was held by the NADP. Thats how hearings work, that’s the structure.

Fighter fails drug test, fighter admits wrong doing and is given a ban via UKAD

or

Fighter fails drug test, fighter claims innocence (99% of cases hence why the UKAD website says “likely” in regards to NADP) hearing is scheduled with UKAD via the NADP, the NADP makes the decision.

Like I said, if you can’t understand how the hearing process works in the UK with UKAD via the NADP then I can’t make it any easier.

Boro lacks the emotional maturity to deal with disagreement much less ever admit he was wrong.

It's funny observing people draw this side of his personality out when he likes to believe he's some kind of intellectual.

He's the type of person who engages performatively using words like "EMBARRASSING", "I feel sorry for you etc." rather than simply say: "I disagree with you and here's the reason."

Suspected white nationalist sympathies also (evidence: he's used their talking points; stereotypes ***s).

[Boro]

I didn’t say it ended the process. I said that it’s on going because they appealed the decision and once the appeal is concluded, if it’s rejected, then the process is done, which it is.

No, literally comparing apples to apples..

Conor Benn, Amir Khan, Glowacki, Tete and insert any other UKAD hearing that’s happened was held by the NADP. Thats how hearings work, that’s the structure.

Fighter fails drug test, fighter admits wrong doing and is given a ban via UKAD

or

Fighter fails drug test, fighter claims innocence (99% of cases hence why the UKAD website says “likely” in regards to NADP) hearing is scheduled with UKAD via the NADP, the NADP makes the decision.

Like I said, if you can’t understand how the hearing process works in the UK with UKAD via the NADP then I can’t make it any easier.

You literally responded to me "Right yeah, an appeal, from the HEARING, that was held by UKAD That he won" but said hearing is yet to even happen...

And you're not comparing apples to apples, Fighters appealing a process and thereby involving the NADP to try and fight their corner and/or exhaust options to try and defend their cheating ways is not one in the same.

As an organisation who deals with all athletes in the UK appealing the decision of an independent arbitration committee/tribunal, if you can't understand how that doesn't equate to "apples to apples" I don't know what to tell you...

[Boro]

Boro lacks the emotional maturity to deal with disagreement much less ever admit he was wrong.

It's funny observing people draw this side of his personality out when he likes to believe he's some kind of intellectual.

He's the type of person who engages performatively using words like "EMBARRASSING", "I feel sorry for you etc." rather than simply say: "I disagree with you and here's the reason."

Suspected white nationalist sympathies also (evidence: he's used their talking points; stereotypes ***s).

Why are you even commenting on me you clown, you tried to comment on me before accusing me of this type of shít before and I proved you to be a liar, don't even @ me again your useless lying piece of shít...

Feel free to point prove any stereotypes i've mentioned relating to ***s either but just like when you lied about me before you won't be able to.

[dan-b]

Why are you even commenting on me you clown, you tried to comment on me before accusing me of this type of shít before and I proved you to be a liar, don't even @ me again your useless lying piece of shít...

Feel free to point prove any stereotypes i've mentioned relating to ***s either but just like when you lied about me before you won't be able to.

IronDanHamza and joseph5620 FYI below.

Like I said Naseem Hamed openly was drinking and eating shít that's technically forbidden are you saying he's not ******!?, otherwise what's your point?

And as i've explained distancing himself from Islam for money isn't surprising, Nigerans are almost as famous as ***s for their love of money...

And don't pretend being around people who claim they're Christians is remotely similar to ******s, most "Christians" today are born again ****** women with 3-4 bastards in toes all with different fathers...

As for the family comment don't be ******, we aren't talking about some second cousin or something we're talking about his parents and under islamic "law" you're a ****** at conception they're not remotely similar, regardless of it being one or both parents who are ******...

This isn't even up for debate it's widely accepted by Islamic scholars.

[Boro]

IronDanHamza and joseph5620 FYI below.

Yes and look at me mention every other religion as well dumb cúnt, i'm not being specific to one you ignorant fool so if you're trying to imply it's "race" you failed son...

What questionable remarks did I make in regards to Haney Lomachenko, that Ramadan was suddenly an issue in his biggest fight.

And I certainly didn't make any towards you, idiot.

When it had never been before? nothing questionable about the truth...

And no one has a fragile ego son, there is more evidence on my side then there is to say otherwise.

Yours or anyone else lack of understanding in that regard isn't my problem.

P.S. This is my first time ever even responding to you, so you're full of shít but nice try with the narrative for context I only responded to ShoulderRoll and Oregonian

"the alleged post" I was appreantly saying questionable remarks - https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/b...-jamaine-ortiz

[dan-b]

Yes and look at me mention every other religion as well dumb cúnt, i'm not being specific to one you ignorant fool...

You're being disingenuous, and you know it. I don't need to explain why.

[IronDanHamza]

You literally responded to me "Right yeah, an appeal, from the HEARING, that was held by UKAD That he won" but said hearing is yet to even happen...

And you're not comparing apples to apples, Fighters appealing a process and thereby involving the NADP to try and fight their corner and/or exhaust options to try and defend their cheating ways is not one in the same.

As an organisation who deals with all athletes in the UK appealing the decision of an independent arbitration committee/tribunal, if you can't understand how that doesn't equate to "apples to apples" I don't know what to tell you...

Yeah….it’s on going because they appealed the decision of the hearing. That appeal process is undergoing this month and if it’s rejected then the case is closed. Which part aren’t you understanding?

No one has “appealed a process”. They’ve claimed innocence or not guilty thus are brought to a hearing carried out by the NADP.

Everyone I just named did that, and thus had a hearing with the NADP it’s literally apples to apples. Any hearing by the way, name on and see who the hearing was undergone by.

I genuinely can’t see where you’re lost at this point, I can’t point you in any direction to make you understand so I’ll guess I’ll just say it again and see if it sinks in more;

Fighter fails drug test, fighter admits wrong doing and is given a ban via UKAD

or

Fighter fails drug test, fighter claims innocence (99% of cases hence why the UKAD website says “likely” in regards to NADP) hearing is scheduled with UKAD via the NADP, the NADP makes the decision.

That is the process of a drug testing hearing. Which Conor Benn has done, and won.

[Boro]

You're being disingenuous, and you know it. I don't need to explain why.

IronDanHamza and joseph5620 FYI below.

And who the hell is "joseph" you're dragging random people into your menial vendetta because you got butt hurt about god knows what.

I'm not being disingenuous at all you idiot, if anyone is disingenuous it's you just like you were in the quote where you tried to claim i was being "racist" towards you when i'd never even commented to you before, you're de****able and seemingly love victimhood.