Comments Thread For: Rolly Romero Noncommittal On Ismael Barroso Rematch

[Corelone]

They're going to give Barroso time to decay. Rolly v Ryan is a duck. What has Ryan done? That goofy shoulder roll he does is hard to look at. The fact that he even tried something so unnatural is a lack of confidence.

[dan-b]

It should be irrelevant whether he's "committal" about it or not. The WBA should force it because that's what was agreed.

[Jsmooth9876]

Bad Grandpa would whoop that boys azz again

[tomhawq]

WBA's corruption in broad daylight. They're not even hiding it anymore.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Mandated. Fight him or get stripped.

Where was this energy when Boots was mandatory on Crawford?

Hypocrites, all.

[crimsonfalcon07]

Can't wait for Rolly to get deep into negotiations with Ryan, have to get stripped to make the fight so Barroso gets the belt he should always have had, then have Ryan pull out and leave this clown high and dry.

[crimsonfalcon07]

Where was this energy when Boots was mandatory on Crawford?

Hypocrites, all.

Boots didn't "lose" by having a clearly corrupt and wrong call made.

Are you so biased you're incapable of seeing the difference between those situations?

And let's be clear. Boots was mandatory for SPENCE, not Crawford. Boots abandoned the mandatory route for Crawford's belt, and took the one that only ordered ONE mandatory in 4 YEARS. Then waited months without petitioning for his shot v Spence. Didn't call for it until Bud v Spence was announced. Where was he on fight night? Why wasn't he calling out the winner immediately in the ring after the fight? As I recall, he was full radio silence for days after the fight, and didn't call out Crawford until Spence activated the rematch clause. Been barking non-stop ever since, but hasn't mentioned Stanionis or Ortiz Jr? I think he's good, but come on now. That's nothing like this situation.

[tokon]

Well, Barroso doesn't have to accept the check. Let's see what happens!

The guy has probably made relative peanuts his whole career. Providing he's gets a guaranteed shot against the winner I wouldn't blame him for taking a decent step aside fee.

[dan-b]

Boots didn't "lose" by having a clearly corrupt and wrong call made.

Are you so biased you're incapable of seeing the difference between those situations?

And let's be clear. Boots was mandatory for SPENCE, not Crawford. Boots abandoned the mandatory route for Crawford's belt, and took the one that only ordered ONE mandatory in 4 YEARS. Then waited months without petitioning for his shot v Spence. Didn't call for it until Bud v Spence was announced. Where was he on fight night? Why wasn't he calling out the winner immediately in the ring after the fight? As I recall, he was full radio silence for days after the fight, and didn't call out Crawford until Spence activated the rematch clause. Been barking non-stop ever since, but hasn't mentioned Stanionis or Ortiz Jr? I think he's good, but come on now. That's nothing like this situation.

Don't even waste your energy. He tries to derail every thread with "muh inconsistency, bruh" because he's an obsessive weirdo.

[SUBZER0ED]

Rolly jumped up on the apron and congratulated Barosso on his big win, but he was also shitting his pants at the thought of facing him again.