Boots didn't "lose" by having a clearly corrupt and wrong call made.
Are you so biased you're incapable of seeing the difference between those situations?
And let's be clear. Boots was mandatory for SPENCE, not Crawford. Boots abandoned the mandatory route for Crawford's belt, and took the one that only ordered ONE mandatory in 4 YEARS. Then waited months without petitioning for his shot v Spence. Didn't call for it until Bud v Spence was announced. Where was he on fight night? Why wasn't he calling out the winner immediately in the ring after the fight? As I recall, he was full radio silence for days after the fight, and didn't call out Crawford until Spence activated the rematch clause. Been barking non-stop ever since, but hasn't mentioned Stanionis or Ortiz Jr? I think he's good, but come on now. That's nothing like this situation.
He doesn’t hold Spence to the same standards as Bud
Ask him why Boots refused to fight Bud not once but twice
Ahhh Dont waste your time , he’ll probably answer you with his alt account anyway
Comment