Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: If Joshua Demolishes Two People Fury Struggled With, People Start To Believe AJ Can Beat Fury

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post
    AJ's best win is still a Fury leftover

    So it doesn't matter much.
    You mean Klitschko​?! So Wlad was a broken man after Fury danced around jabbing to edge a decision by 3 rounds was he?
    Look what AJ did to Klitschko​ in comparison.

    Fury edge out Klitschko​ and denied him a rematch by getting all sad and snorting lots of coke, plus he was on nandrolone at the time of the fight anyway.
    Fury got lucky against Wallin as the fight should have been rules a TKO, and was under pressure all fight.
    Fury embarrassed himself and all of boxing against Ngannou and got a corrupt decision.

    AJ took a beating and ultimately destroyed Klitschko​.
    AJ destroyed Wallin
    We will see what AJ does to Ngannou but Fury fans are already ****ting themselves hahaah

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
      Joshua is the Heavyweight who took the Heavyweight Division into a completely new Dynasty'.

      All these years later, Fury has just fought Ngannou 'Fury did not win the fight, Fury was given the decision'.

      'Somebody, some Heavyweight out there has to legitimately beat Francis Ngannou and not just be given a decision'.

      EVERYONE within the boxing community is in agreement with this point.

      It is 2024, and Anthony Joshua is stepping up 'To fight off Francis Ngannou for real, because Tyson Fury did not do this' etc.
      Just bring your horse in, tie it to a post and let it sh.!t til its hearts content.







      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by thack View Post
        I don't think even if Fury beats Uysk and Ngannou beats Joshua that Hearn would think any different .It's pointless to listen to him........period.
        Yup
        Just like
        It's Pointless to read daily every single Anti-AJ/Eddie Hearn Matchroom comment You post
        Period
        Sheesh
        2024 Get a social life buddy

        Comment


        • #64
          Triangle theory doesn't work in boxing Eddie

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Gideon lock View Post
            Triangle theory doesn't work in boxing Eddie
            It absolutely works when making fights though.

            Beating opponents who your rival struggled with has always been a viable matchmaking approach.
            Gideon lock Gideon lock likes this.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Oshio View Post

              Just stick to football please.
              Thus said the cultural appropriator.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post

                Didn't realise Parker shut out the unified champ Klitschko

                I must've missed it.
                Fury's best win was against Wilder. The Klitschko fight was an embarrassment for both of them.
                The most action on show was Fury going life and death trying to pull his shorts up. Back flab and ass crack all over the place.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Eddie is turning into delusional Eddie quickly. So he's going by the usual logic that fighter A beats fighter B who fighter C lost to, then that automatically means, fighter A beats fighter C. How many times has that NOT come true? You'd think Eddie got into boxing yesterday. While we know that's not true, I can't help, but think Eddie treats his fighters fans as uneducated in boxing and simply eat up whatever he says.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Toffee View Post

                    It absolutely works when making fights though.

                    Beating opponents who your rival struggled with has always been a viable matchmaking approach.
                    I agree but in terms of fight outcome it's not always a given.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by ELPacman View Post
                      Eddie is turning into delusional Eddie quickly. So he's going by the usual logic that fighter A beats fighter B who fighter C lost to, then that automatically means, fighter A beats fighter C. How many times has that NOT come true? You'd think Eddie got into boxing yesterday. While we know that's not true, I can't help, but think Eddie treats his fighters fans as uneducated in boxing and simply eat up whatever he says.
                      He never said that. He said people will start to believe that. And he's dead right - he's not underestimating the average boxing fan. He's got their understanding of boxing nailed.

                      If Joshua destroys Ngannou, then casuals will see Fury v AJ in a different light. It's always been that way.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP