Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Errol Spence Has Cataract Surgery, Wonders 'Why Do You Think Crawford Hit Me With So Many Jabs & Hooks'

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    30 yo with cataracts?

    Comment


    • #32
      errol,
      maybe because how flatfooted you are, the lack of head and body movements, allowed crawford to land so many jabs which in turn damaged your eye?

      i saw all your fights errol
      you always stand in there like a tree trunk

      Comment


      • #33
        I have absoloutley no horse in this race but if you think Spence was 100% in that fight you don't know what you are looking at. He looked like a melted waxwork figure of himself.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by El_Mero View Post

          If PBC is smart, they make a tournament at 154, tim/crawf winner vs vergil/akmhadaliev winner. When Mell finally comes back, if he does to 154, he can meet the winner
          Akhmadaliev fights at 122...

          You talking Bakhram Murtazaliev or Magomed Kurbanov?
          ​​​​​​
          Or Israil Madrimov, I suppose?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Pac=Duran View Post
            30 yo with cataracts?
            Yes cataracts can form from injuries and previous eye surgery, both of which he's gone through because i'm pretty sure he had a torn retina in that very same eye.

            Comment


            • #36
              I'm not entertaining the idea completely but he did look weird in the eyes during the ringwalk sort of sleepy looking and red eyed maybe they put some drops in his eyes as a temp fix for the fight. Regardless Crawford beat him in every department.

              Comment


              • #37
                I like Spence, but why activate the rematch clause a month after the fight, then wait 6 months to have the surgery?

                So much wasted time.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by greeneye99 View Post

                  Yea right....
                  You cared enough to read the Spence/Crawford Articles
                  Then
                  Express how You feel in the Comments
                  Lololololol
                  I care enough to let you know that I don't care.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Atypicalbrit View Post
                    I have absoloutley no horse in this race but if you think Spence was 100% in that fight you don't know what you are looking at. He looked like a melted waxwork figure of himself.
                    That is so true but fanboys only ever see the opponents as the best versions, its like a mental requirement of being a fan that logic can not get over.

                    And I have nothing bad to say about TC at all. He is a great fighter; I picked him to win and didn't care which way it went, but you are right. Whatever the cause, that was not the best version Of Spence; something was up, and the only chance they have of selling a rematch is to push that scenario.
                    tkoboxingscene tkoboxingscene likes this.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Lupara View Post
                      I like Spence, but why activate the rematch clause a month after the fight, then wait 6 months to have the surgery?

                      So much wasted time.
                      Easy. Someone told him to lock the rematch in. Then when Crawford got stripped it was like, might as well get the eyes fixed

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP