Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Krzysztof Glowacki Hit With Four-Year Ban By UKAD Over Failed Test in Riakporhe Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    UKAD cleared Conor Benn of any wrongdoing somehow, though.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
      UKAD cleared Conor Benn of any wrongdoing somehow, though.
      Obviously because of the contents of the case presented would be why they made different decisions.

      Firstly, Benn failed for trace amount of Clomid, which is an oral PCT. Much easier to present a case for contamination on that.

      Glowacki failed for EQ which is an injectable anabolic steroid. Whilst contamination is possible, it's very unlikely.

      So just off that alone I can't say I'm overly surprised that they've come to differing conclusions here. Every PED case is different, these two having quite glaring differences.

      You wouldn't know that because you're an idiot who knows nothing about PEDs. Makes me wonder why you always pass comment on these cases. Oh except Canelo of course the PED cheat who's "likely clean"

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by MulaKO View Post
        Actually never heard anyone getting that harsh of a sentence
        Zolani Tete, last summer. Four years as well.

        MulaKO MulaKO likes this.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Boro View Post

          4 years is their standard ban, it normally gets reduced to 2 years most times e.g. Fury, Whyte, Khan so on and so forth.

          But for some reason they seem to uphold the 4 year thing with Molina and now with Glowacki when it comes to foreign fighters.

          And i'm sure they're plenty more, Molina is just the one that instantly came to mind.
          They went after Molina for sparring too IIRC.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

            Obviously because of the contents of the case presented would be why they made different decisions.

            Firstly, Benn failed for trace amount of Clomid, which is an oral PCT. Much easier to present a case for contamination on that.

            Glowacki failed for EQ which is an injectable anabolic steroid. Whilst contamination is possible, it's very unlikely.

            So just off that alone I can't say I'm overly surprised that they've come to differing conclusions here. Every PED case is different, these two having quite glaring differences.

            You wouldn't know that because you're an idiot who knows nothing about PEDs. Makes me wonder why you always pass comment on these cases. Oh except Canelo of course the PED cheat who's "likely clean"
            Only PED users/“experts” like yourself should get to comment, right?

            UKAD has never explained why they came to the lenient decision they did with Conor Benn. Full transparency on what proof they had of contamination would be nice, as would knowing who the alleged sources of contamination were. But as I say about Canelo…in the end it doesn’t matter why a prohibited substance is in your system. If you break the rules you should face punishment for it. And Benn deserved a harsher punishment IMO.
            Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 01-02-2024, 05:23 PM.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

              Only PED users/“experts” like yourself should get to comment, right?

              UKAD has never explained why they came to the lenient decision they did with Conor Benn. Full transparency on what proof they had of contamination would be nice, as would knowing who the alleged sources of contamination were. But as I say about Canelo…in the end it doesn’t matter why a prohibited substance is in your system. If you break the rules you should face punishment for. And Benn deserved a harsher punishment IMO.
              Oh no, anyone can comment. They should just have an informed opinion unlike you who is clueless.

              It's very easy to understand why these two cases had different outcomes considering what they tested positive for. It's not a surprise.

              These hearings are and always have been confidential so full transparency isn't an option if it's regarding UKAD. Benn's had his case and was cleared that's the long and short of it.

              Yeah but you deem Canelo likely clean now which is just straight up retarded but there's no suprise there.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                Oh no, anyone can comment. They should just have an informed opinion unlike you who is clueless.

                It's very easy to understand why these two cases had different outcomes considering what they tested positive for. It's not a surprise.

                These hearings are and always have been confidential so full transparency isn't an option if it's regarding UKAD. Benn's had his case and was cleared that's the long and short of it.

                Yeah but you deem Canelo likely clean now which is just straight up retarded but there's no suprise there.
                What makes you suspect that Canelo is not clean now? He did VADA testing for 4 training camps in 12 months when he unified all the super middleweight belts. Doesn’t leave much room to cycle on and off or whatever it is you PED cheats do, or does it?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                  What makes you suspect that Canelo is not clean now? He did VADA testing for 4 training camps in 12 months when he unified all the super middleweight belts. Doesn’t leave much room to cycle on and off or whatever it is you PED cheats do, or does it?
                  But you claim that Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs despite doing a 24/7, 365 USADA program aswell as passing a VADA testing program.

                  How is Canelo "likely clean" whilst Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs?

                  And to answer your question, it is not difficult to beat a VADA test so no, the fact he passed a few VADA tests does not make him "likely clean" at all.

                  And also I'm not a PED cheat as I'm not a professional athete who competes in a sport where PEDs are banned.

                  An example of a PED cheat would be Canelo.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                    But you claim that Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs despite doing a 24/7, 365 USADA program aswell as passing a VADA testing program.

                    How is Canelo "likely clean" whilst Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs?

                    And to answer your question, it is not difficult to beat a VADA test so no, the fact he passed a few VADA tests does not make him "likely clean" at all.

                    And also I'm not a PED cheat as I'm not a professional athete who competes in a sport where PEDs are banned.

                    An example of a PED cheat would be Canelo.
                    Canelo uses VADA. VADA is not USADA.

                    Have you taken illegal substances to compete in bodybuilding? If so that makes you a PED cheat.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                      Canelo uses VADA. VADA is not USADA.
                      And?

                      Is USADA not a legitimate testing procedure?

                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                      ​Have you taken illegal substances to compete in bodybuilding? If so that makes you a PED cheat.
                      PED's are not illegal to use in Pro Bodybuilding you dumb fck.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP