Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fighter of the Year !

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

    Yes, you know those little things that are on a Chess Board? They're called pieces

    You sent me the synonyms for "feasible" by the way, not plausible Feasible means POSSIBLE whereas Plausible means REASONABLE. You might want to look up the synonyms for "plausible" you fcking retard!

    You know those things known as "words", they hold different meanings. They mean different things.




    Ok and what you've just cited there that Canelo provided is NOT evidence that his drug test was positive due to contaminated meat. How can I say this in another way that you'll understand? Going to a place or even 100 places, is NOT evidence that is drug test was positive due to contaminated meat. You can repeat it a trillion times, that fact will never change.

    So to make it clear (again) both cases have a PLAUSIBILITY of ZERO. Yes, as in the literal term ZERO. The levels of likelihood between to two are #1 irrelevant and #2 unproveable because the evidence is at zero so it's a moot point.


    Now, why don't you stop being the spineless coward you are and explain and justify your position that Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs and Mayweather is clean.

    Justify that stance.

    Every time you avoid that you look more and more pathetic. Have some pride and address your claim.
    Well, guess what? According to Oxford Languages some of the synonyms to feasible are “plausible” and “likely.”

    Just give it up, Dan. Trying to split semantic hairs is not going to make your point any less wrong.

    The fact is Canelo has provided more in his defense than Conor Benn. Just one of several ways in which their situations are obviously different and not the same as you insist. If you cannot even admit that much then there really is no point at attempting to have a reasoned debate with you.
    Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 12-27-2023, 03:24 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

      According to Oxford Languages some of the synonyms to feasible are “plausible” and “likely.”

      Just give it up, Dan.

      The fact is Canelo has provided more in his defense than Conor Benn. Just one of several ways in which their situations are obviously different and not the same as you insist. If you can’t even admit that much then there really is no point at attempting to have a reasoned debate with you.
      Right and why are you sending me the synonyms for a synonym of the word I used?

      You sent me the synonyms for Feasible and said likely is a "strong" one (which it is) because feasible means possible. So you just messed up there, didn't you? It's ok.

      However if actually do you look up the synonyms for the actual word I used which was plausible, "likely" isn't in the "strong" option because plausible means reasonable, which wouldn't be deemed the same as likely, despite a similar word (A synonym)

      I hope this has helped you. I'm aware you struggle with words mightily

      I've never said their situations are the same. I've said their PLAUSIBILITY is the same, which, they are; ZERO.

      Again, can't explain that in any other way that's easier to understand.


      Now that's settled....

      Why don't you stop being the spineless coward you are and explain and justify your position that Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs and Mayweather is clean.

      Justify that stance.

      Every time you avoid that you look more and more pathetic. Have some pride and address your claim.​

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

        Right and why are you sending me the synonyms for a synonym of the word I used?

        You sent me the synonyms for Feasible and said likely is a "strong" one (which it is) because feasible means possible. So you just messed up there, didn't you? It's ok.

        However if actually do you look up the synonyms for the actual word I used which was plausible, "likely" isn't in the "strong" option because plausible means reasonable, which wouldn't be deemed the same as likely, despite a similar word (A synonym)

        I hope this has helped you. I'm aware you struggle with words mightily

        I've never said their situations are the same. I've said their PLAUSIBILITY is the same, which, they are; ZERO.

        Again, can't explain that in any other way that's easier to understand.


        Now that's settled....

        Why don't you stop being the spineless coward you are and explain and justify your position that Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs and Mayweather is clean.

        Justify that stance.

        Every time you avoid that you look more and more pathetic. Have some pride and address your claim.​
        Anyway you want to cut it, whatever synonym you prefer to use: it is less reasonable or probable or likely that Conor Benn ate tainted eggs in the UK (where clomiphene is prohibited for use in producing eggs) than it is that Canelo ate tainted meat in Mexico (where clenbuterol is widely used on cattle.)

        End of story.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

          Anyway you want to cut it, whatever synonym you prefer to use: it is less reasonable or probable or likely that Conor Benn ate tainted eggs in the UK (where clomiphene is prohibited for use in producing eggs) than it is that Canelo ate tainted meat in Mexico (where clenbuterol is widely used on cattle.)

          End of story.
          They are both as plausible as each other because the demonstrable evidence to support both is zero. Meaning plausibility - Zero.

          Glad to be of help.

          Now that's settled....

          Why don't you stop being the spineless coward you are and explain and justify your position that Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs and Mayweather is clean.

          Justify that stance.

          Every time you avoid that you look more and more pathetic. Have some pride and address your claim.​​

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP