Tyson Furys LEGACY is being completely destroyed within a few months

[NYG]

Someone said Usyk is an all time great? Lmfao

[joseph5620]

ATG - no. Resume - probably a bit better than Fury's, yeah, but at cruiserweight while he was a man of heavyweight size. A resume doesn't necessarily mean fighter A is better than fighter B and which one is the better one is about to be seen.

ATG- Yes. One of the greatest cruiserweights of all time. 1 of 3 cruiserweights in history to win a heavyweight title. Undisputed champion. Two division champion. List anything Fury has accomplished that even comes close to that. I'll Wait for your answer.

Fury's best win was a decision over a well past prime Klitschko. Corrie Sanders and Ross Puritty have more impressive wins over Klitschko than Fury does.That speaks for itself.


Usyk's resume is far superior to Fury's. That's not even debatable.

[joseph5620]

No, Usyk lost to Dubois. And had a draw against Briedis in reality.

If you want to do that, Fury lost to an MMA fighter making his pro debut in a boxing match. In reality that's far worse than losing to Dubois.

[joseph5620]

Lol at “taking Wilders 0”

So every boxer can only ever legitimately lose once, and this is the fan base that calls others casuals.

Boxing probably has more casual fans than any other sport and it shows on this site with the comments.

[Smash]

Fury's best win was a decision over a well past prime Klitschko. Corrie Sanders and Ross Puritty have more impressive wins over Klitschko than Fury does.That speaks for itself.

.

Fury went to germany and easily beat vlad who was the current long reigning champ at the time undefeated for over a decade etc, u cant take that performance away from him, that was not an easy thing to do, just like going to the states and taking out wilder, he did both & im not a fan of fury either but results are results

[Stuntman Mike]

His whole legacy is being shattered before our very eyes.

All started with the Ngannou fight, terrible performance, controversy, some felt it could’ve gone either way.

Now we have seen his best win, or second best, Deontay wilder EASILY beaten by a B level fighter. Not only that, another of his opponents on his record, Otto wallin, who gave him a semi tough fight, just got absolutely demolished By AJ.

And I’ve ALWAYS believed this, Not some bandwagon I’m hopping on, but Usyk completely utterly obliterates and bamboozles Fury and stops him easily.

February 17th will be the final nail in Tyson furys legacy.

I think furys main weapon is his weight advantage in most of his fights and if he can use it good again usyk then he beats usyk in a horrible fight

However I beleive and always have that joshua gets to Fury with counters and wins quite easily

Heck the only guy to counter fury successfully was ngannou and he embarrassed fury the rest of furys resume consists of no counter punchers

If fury had fought ortiz when he was relevant he could have been done years ago

[joseph5620]

Fury went to germany and easily beat vlad who was the current long reigning champ at the time undefeated for over a decade etc, u cant take that performance away from him, that was not an easy thing to do, just like going to the states and taking out wilder, he did both & im not a fan of fury either but results are results

Doesn't change the fact Wladimir was not only well past his prime but a better version of him was knocked out or stopped 3 other times before Fury beat him with a boring decision in an awful fight. His fans need to stop pretending that Fury had an unprecedented victory and it doesn't make him an all time great by any stretch.


I consider Wladimer Klitschko an ATG but he was just about done when Fury fought him. The fact that he only fought one other time after (two years later) tells you that.

[Smash]

Doesn't change the fact Wladimir was not only well past his prime but a better version of him was knocked out or stopped 3 other times before Fury beat him with a boring decision in an awful fight. His fans need to stop pretending that Fury had an unprecedented victory and it doesn't make him an all time great by any stretch.


I consider Wladimer Klitschko an ATG but he was just about done when Fury fought him. The fact that he only fought one other time after (two years later) tells you that.

vlad changed his style as a result of those earlier losses, he was much harder to beat as a result, fury sent him into retirement actually, vlad was still fighting well and regular and dominating up to the fury fight, he may not have been age prime but he was still good

he also didnt have manny in his corner to force him to change tack v fury, manny would have been shouting at him at times

[RetroSpeed05]

Fury went to germany and easily beat vlad who was the current long reigning champ at the time undefeated for over a decade etc, u cant take that performance away from him, that was not an easy thing to do, just like going to the states and taking out wilder, he did both & im not a fan of fury either but results are results

Interesting you dont bring up the controversy around that fight and why the rematch didn't happen. Maybe if Fury wasn't a drug cheat he get more respect.

[N/A]

ATG- Yes. One of the greatest cruiserweights of all time. 1 of 3 cruiserweights in history to win a heavyweight title. Undisputed champion. Two division champion. List anything Fury has accomplished that even comes close to that. I'll Wait for your answer.

No. He barely has 16 cruiser fights and at least one very questionable victory over Briedis. You call that ATG? He is a legendary amateur and a good professional, that's all.

Fury's best win was a decision over a well past prime Klitschko. Corrie Sanders and Ross Puritty have more impressive wins over Klitschko than Fury does.That speaks for itself.

According to you. But Fury toyed with that cheater. I bet you forget all the Wlad's cheating, one that was previously talked about by Pulev. Plus, Fury has several other good wins. He however missed the chance of doing 2-3 more of them. Still has it, but will he do it?

Usyk's resume is far superior to Fury's. That's not even debatable.

For a blinded fan - it isn't debatable. But I am debating it and it seems you feel the need to prove it, as if it wasn't questionable, there wouldn't be any reason for doing it.

If you want to do that, Fury lost to an MMA fighter making his pro debut in a boxing match. In reality that's far worse than losing to Dubois.

First, he didn't lose, but underperformed. Second, Francis is a boxing debutant, but not a fighting debutant and his first touch with martial arts was boxing. But if that makes you sleep better - good night then.