Only in the eyes of keyboard warriors who DKSAB! I look forward to seeing what creative ways the haters come up with to discredit his wins over Oleksandr Usyk in 2024.
this heavyweight division is absolutely horrid. You guys are justifiably (might i add) ripping fury but usyk just caught a body shot and looked extremely venerable. Yes he got up and finished off the fight but a belt line shot that took him out and even injured him leaves a terrible taste. The division is just all around garbage......
he got up after a big break lol, i say it was a legal shot but hey....
So because AJ beat Wallin way easier it means what - Fury's resume is *hit, because Otto is anyway a crap? But then AJ continues to beat craps: Franklin, Helenius and now Otto. Weird how no one talked about that the first man who allowed us to compare them is Whyte who Fury fought way easier than AJ did.
It is always like that for the Fury haters: Fury is crap, but if Usyk or Joshua beats him, it proves how great they are. If Fury fights someone, that someone is crap, but if Usyk or AJ fights him - he is not a crap.
Can I come up with the fact Wilder beat Helenius in less than one round, but AJ needed seven for that?
Boxing is about styles as well, you can hardly conclude only based on how X will beat Y because both beat Z, but X did it easier.
DId Europeans get a different feed of the Chisora/Usyk fight or something? Yall the only MF's who seem to think it was close. 9-3 fight, not at all difficult to score.
Chisora/Parker was much closer.
British commentary on that one was pretty bad as I recall - they made out like Delboi was really running Usyk close when in fact although Derek did succeeed in making it a bit scrappy the clean shots were largely only going in one direction.
British commentary on that one was pretty bad as I recall - they made out like Delboi was really running Usyk close when in fact although Derek did succeeed in making it a bit scrappy the clean shots were largely only going in one direction.
Sounds similar to what they did during GGG - Brook. British commentary was getting excited because Brook landed a few combos, neglecting to notice that GGG was very obviously prepared to take the shots to land his own because he felt little power in them.
So because AJ beat Wallin way easier it means what - Fury's resume is *hit, because Otto is anyway a crap? But then AJ continues to beat craps: Franklin, Helenius and now Otto. Weird how no one talked about that the first man who allowed us to compare them is Whyte who Fury fought way easier than AJ did.
It is always like that for the Fury haters: Fury is crap, but if Usyk or Joshua beats him, it proves how great they are. If Fury fights someone, that someone is crap, but if Usyk or AJ fights him - he is not a crap.
Can I come up with the fact Wilder beat Helenius in less than one round, but AJ needed seven for that?
Boxing is about styles as well, you can hardly conclude only based on how X will beat Y because both beat Z, but X did it easier.
The people applying this logic are mostly trolls. Don't get too excited about it. You have to try to pick out the occasional gem when diving into the sea of nonsense which is boxing forums and comment sections.
Only engage with edgelords to mock them. Like this Star Wars incel Madison boxing referring to Tapales as a "nobody". He presumably thinks he's "somebody" because he has a large post count on an internet forum.
British commentary on that one was pretty bad as I recall - they made out like Delboi was really running Usyk close when in fact although Derek did succeeed in making it a bit scrappy the clean shots were largely only going in one direction.
That makes more sense lol. Because Del was walking into punches for 12 rounds
Comment