Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Eddie Hearn Says Conor Benn's Next Fight, in February, Will Take Place Outside of England

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

    The board are definitely being petulant at this point, it’s essentially delaying tactics, but I’ve got no sympathy for Benn either. He chose to go down the litigation route assuming they’d bend over backwards like they did for Fury, Whyte etc. His spoilt brat mentality has cost him big time. This could’ve all been sorted by now I reckon.
    I’m with you, no sympathy for him at all.

    But at this point, in fairness to him, he’s done the process asked of him from what I can see. I don’t understand the narrative that he hasn’t. Yeah it took him way longer than he should have being a child but he’s done all he can now.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Clegg View Post

      And instead of waiting for that process, he's running away to fight in another country, which is the exact thing he said he wouldn't do.
      His suspension has been lifted though so why shouldn’t he?

      He can’t wait forever.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Clegg View Post

        Yeah that's the ridiculous thing, he probably would've gotten a 6 month ban. It wasn't one of the most powerful steroids he popped for. Even with a 12 month ban starting the day of the failed test, he'd be back now. He still could've done a bunch of media interviews protesting his innocence and had most of his fans believe him.
        Yeah Conor throwing his toys out the pram has really stalled his career and further damaged his reputation.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Clegg View Post

          Yeah that's the ridiculous thing, he probably would've gotten a 6 month ban. It wasn't one of the most powerful steroids he popped for. Even with a 12 month ban starting the day of the failed test, he'd be back now. He still could've done a bunch of media interviews protesting his innocence and had most of his fans believe him.
          It’s not a steroid at all.

          Its used for PCT (post cycle therapy) mostly.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

            He’s only not licensed right now because they’ve appealed the decision of the hearing.

            He’s not suspended now. He should be clear to fight at that point and as soon as the BBBoC’s appeal is rejected then he will be.

            To my understanding.
            He shouldn’t be clear to fight now. Not until his business with the BBBoC is settled.

            That’s why NSAC and the California boxing commission refused to license him. It should be a united front among the different commissions. And it would have been except for the idiots in Florida.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

              He shouldn’t be clear to fight now. Not until his business with the BBBoC is settled.

              That’s why NSAC and the California boxing commission refused to license him. It should be a united front among the different commissions. And it would have been except for the idiots in Florida.
              He got cleared to fight when he won his hearing with UKAD and the NAPD and his suspension was lifted.

              Now it’s under appeal but it’s petulant. The BBBoC know that their appeal is likely getting rejected.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                He got cleared to fight when he won his hearing with UKAD and the NAPD and his suspension was lifted.

                Now it’s under appeal but it’s petulant. The BBBoC know that their appeal is likely getting rejected.
                When it gets rejected then he can fight. It’s a bad precedent to not respect the wishes of the commission that had jurisdiction over this.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                  When it gets rejected then he can fight. It’s a bad precedent to not respect the wishes of the commission that had jurisdiction over this.
                  It’s solely because it’s under an appeal. The hearing is done and they lost, they’re appealing out of spite more than anything at this point.

                  None of this changes the fact that he had a hearing that he won and his suspension was lifted.

                  He’s not going to wait around forever for an appeal process when he’s no longer suspended.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                    It’s solely because it’s under an appeal. The hearing is done and they lost, they’re appealing out of spite more than anything at this point.

                    None of this changes the fact that he had a hearing that he won and his suspension was lifted.

                    He’s not going to wait around forever for an appeal process when he’s no longer suspended.
                    The appeal process is still a part of the commission’s overall process. Other commissions should respect that so that their procedures get respected in return. Like Nevada and California did.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP