It's independent and unbiased because you agree with it?
Because as I said in the first post, it didn't provide a single quote or piece of evidence that he is the lead promoter.
The biggest clue is that, when asked, no-one has said that Frank is the lead promoter. Not even Frank. No materials say he is the lead promoter. The ticket sales don't say he's the lead promoter.
They're all working for "His Excellency". Saudi money has removed all ego from the setup of this night.
Why would he need to? It’s beyond obvious and it’s not relevant to the article to prove Frank Warren is the lead promoter either.
Frank is the only promoter advertising the full event, check any other promoters events schedule, they only list fights their fighters are involved in.
For there to be a lead promoter the fight would have to a co-promotion you thick c***.
That's like saying that for there to be a manager of a football team there must be a team of football players ... therefore, one of the players must be the manager!
I'm not sure if you are smart enough to use sophistry, however bad it may be, or just dumb enough to confuse yourself with your own words.
There was no need for this event to have a lead promoter because it is being funded and staged by Turki Alalshikh on behalf of the Saudi government.
Why would he need to? It’s beyond obvious and it’s not relevant to the article to prove Frank Warren is the lead promoter either.
Frank is the only promoter advertising the full event, check any other promoters events schedule, they only list fights their fighters are involved in.
More bad sophistry. You are using the word "promoter" in 2 different ways, possibly without even realising what you're doing?
Promoter, as in .. someone who publicises and advertises something. And "lead promoter" as in .. someone who funds and organises a boxing show, then sells the tickets and broadcasting rights for it.
Nobody is dis*****g that Warren and Queensbury took the lead in announcing and publicising the show in the UK, because they were already working with the Saudis on Fury vs Usyk, which was slated to be the main event.
But that doesn't make Frank Warren the lead promoter, in the way you are claiming here.
That's like saying that for there to be a manager of a football team there must be a team of football players ... therefore, one of the players must be the manager!
I'm not sure if you are smart enough to use sophistry, however bad it may be, or just dumb enough to confuse yourself with your own words.
There was no need for this event to have a lead promoter because it is being funded and staged by Turki Alalshikh on behalf of the Saudi government.
What sort of analogy is that you thick f***.
If there’s just one promoter how can there be a lead promoter? It would obviously need to be a co-promotion.
More bad sophistry. You are using the word "promoter" in 2 different ways, possibly without even realising what you're doing?
Promoter, as in .. someone who publicises and advertises something. And "lead promoter" as in .. someone who funds and organises a boxing show, then sells the tickets and broadcasting rights for it.
Where’s this definition from? Your own mind? Why does a lead promoter need to fund the event?
The lead promoter, is the promoter leading the promotion. In this case, Frank Warren. Get over it.
Where’s this definition from? Your own mind? Why does a lead promoter need to fund the event?
The lead promoter, is the promoter leading the promotion. In this case, Frank Warren. Get over it.
Right now, I am remembering that famous quote from Mark Twain ... "Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience"
Comment