Prograis has to stop Devin if he wants to win. The fight is not in Vegas, but once again, the Haneys set all the rules and probably ensured certain judges will be present. Regis is probably not going to outpoint Devin anyway, but his only chance to "take it" from Devin is to send Devin to the shadow realm.
Comments Thread For: Prograis On Haney-Loma: At First, Honestly, I Thought Loma Won; Probably Could've Been Draw
Collapse
-
-
But ****** people have made it into something it never was. Drives me nuts. It doesn't mean the champ gets the nod in every close round. Plenty of champs have gotten their titles in close fights and split decisions against a defending champion.
Comment
-
This particular line comes from the fact that the champ retains in the case of a tie. You actually have to win, even on a close disputed split, in order to win the belt. A tie isn't good enough. Leonard v Hagler is a good example of a challenger taking the title on a disputed split (which Dave Moretti was also involved in, on the wrong side as always, since he's a corrupt POS).
But ****** people have made it into something it never was. Drives me nuts. It doesn't mean the champ gets the nod in every close round. Plenty of champs have gotten their titles in close fights and split decisions against a defending champion.
​​​​​​
Comment
-
Prograis has to stop Devin if he wants to win. The fight is not in Vegas, but once again, the Haneys set all the rules and probably ensured certain judges will be present. Regis is probably not going to outpoint Devin anyway, but his only chance to "take it" from Devin is to send Devin to the shadow realm.Comment
-
I comment every time I hear it to try to correct the record, but it feels like shouting into the wind.
Usually the same people say things like, "it's a close fight so it could have gone either way," as if it's impossible to have a close fight that's clearly won by one fighter. MOST fights at top level are close, often razor thin. If there's no way to tell which fighter actually won based on what they do in the ring according to the rules, they might just as well flip a coin to decide the winner, and save themselves a ton of TBI and wear and tear.Comment
-
Comment
-
Seriously. EVERY time it gets used, it's to justify a robbery. Even hear it from people who really ought to know better.
I comment every time I hear it to try to correct the record, but it feels like shouting into the wind.
Usually the same people say things like, "it's a close fight so it could have gone either way," as if it's impossible to have a close fight that's clearly won by one fighter. MOST fights at top level are close, often razor thin. If there's no way to tell which fighter actually won based on what they do in the ring according to the rules, they might just as well flip a coin to decide the winner, and save themselves a ton of TBI and wear and tear.
There will always be people denying this. However, people will eventually read your post here and realize the reality of the situation. I made a post a long time ago about Floyd never fighting anyone with a reach advantage. No one really ever highlighted that before or even mentioned it. Now, I hear people on YouTube bringing that up time and time again. So people do read these threads. Your shouting is not in vain. It does reach people.Comment
-
What I'm saying is that the B fighter must be willing to engage and take risks in order to take the titles away from the champion. In my judgement; Loma did not do that. He left too many rounds on the table without doing nothing.
He wasn't letting his hands go enough, he was spotting Devin rounds where he did almost next to nothing in them. In a close fight; The B- fighter cannot reasonably expect to win titles from the champion that way.
Loma competed but he did not win it.
Comment
Comment