Prime Hopkins versus Prime Calzaghe ... Let's End It Here

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #91


    Hopkins has always fought like this.

    True story

    Comment

    • The_Demon
      Big dog
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 13604
      • 1,354
      • 888
      • 22,971

      #92
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK


      Hopkins has always fought like this.

      True story
      na hes a hell of a fighter and would make calzaghe look bad
      im not surprised hops winning the poll as calzaghe isnt 2 well liked on here
      but it would be a very close fight,no doubt

      Comment

      • hammerhiem
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 4877
        • 129
        • 102
        • 11,163

        #93
        Originally posted by Stoppage
        If a 43 year old Bernard Hopkins nearly beat Calzaghe, including knocking him down, a prime Hopkins would beat Calzaghe.
        I think 43 year old Hopkins is closer to his prime level than 37 year old Calzaghe.

        But then i suppose you started watching Calzaghe when Lacy was supposed to destroy him.

        By 37 Calzaghe had lost some of his speed, most of his power, had to change his offencive work to a less effective loser style, his reflexes wasn't as sharp.

        same is true of Hopkins of course but less so and Hopkins style makes the crack less obvious.

        I never understand why people think that the Calzaghe that fought lacy, Kessler, hopkins and Jones is somehow the prime Calzaghe, trust me it wasn't.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #94
          Originally posted by hammerhiem
          I think 43 year old Hopkins is closer to his prime level than 37 year old Calzaghe.
          Unbelievable the things you read here...

          Hopkins who now throws 12 punches a round is closer to his prime than Calzaghe, who was still a blur up until his last fight. Must be the loss of that one-punch power

          Comment

          • ИATAS
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 36648
            • 2,509
            • 1,953
            • 50,835

            #95
            Originally posted by hammerhiem

            I never understand why people think that the Calzaghe that fought lacy, Kessler, hopkins and Jones is somehow the prime Calzaghe, trust me it wasn't.
            Maybe because those were the only people worth a damn he ever fought and no one knew who the hell calzaghe was prior to that.

            I'll say this, Calzaghe at 36 was much closer to his prime than hopkins was at 43, I mean Calzaghe just beat the one really solid opponent prior in Kessler. Hopkins has slowed down quite a bit which showed against Winky (and even against Tarver he slowed down despite winning easily) . Silly arguement regardless since the thread is prime vs prime.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #96
              Originally posted by ИATAS206
              Maybe because those were the only people worth a damn he ever fought and no one knew who the hell calzaghe was prior to that.
              That is true. He never locked horns with Andrew Council.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #97
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                That is true. He never locked horns with Andrew Council.
                That's because he couldn't figure out what 'style' to use.

                Comment

                • BEEHOP
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 1991
                  • 69
                  • 308
                  • 8,880

                  #98
                  Bernard wins a wide UD. He was old enough to be a grandfather when he fought Joe, COME ON!

                  Comment

                  • Dr. Ironfist
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 141
                    • 24
                    • 0
                    • 182

                    #99
                    Calzaghe by UD with the crowd chanting easy. It would look a lot like the Lacy fight with some clinches and headbutts from the challenger thrown in.

                    Comment

                    • Mr. Philadel
                      #215Boxing
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 20893
                      • 1,071
                      • 1,413
                      • 35,332

                      #100
                      the B.Hop that knocked Tito silly would've beat Joe IMO.......B.Hop has the PERFECT style right now to beat him.....I felt he did but thats why we have rematches.......my bad!!.....Joe passed on that one!!......and as for that April night in Vegas about a year and a half ago......
                      Tests before the fight indicated that he had a
                      thyroid problem, but Hopkins refused to blame his performance on it!!!!


                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP