I get we debate sh^t, but usually its sh^t that will be proven or not on Saturday or a Saturday a few mos (or sadly yrs sometimes) away. This is lil kid fantasy sh^t tho. I don't see ppl talking about the best 1B MLB player or RB NFL player of all time week in week out tho. I get it here & there as a fun lil thing, but all the time there are ppl debating this weird ass lil kid fantasy sh^t.
If Canelo Beats Beanvidez he's clearly the best 168 of all time
Collapse
-
I get we debate sh^t, but usually its sh^t that will be proven or not on Saturday or a Saturday a few mos (or sadly yrs sometimes) away. This is lil kid fantasy sh^t tho. I don't see ppl talking about the best 1B MLB player or RB NFL player of all time week in week out tho. I get it here & there as a fun lil thing, but all the time there are ppl debating this weird ass lil kid fantasy sh^t. -
Why don’t you just address the actual point instead of deflecting and avoiding them?
How do you go about logically ranking a fighter in a weight class, he hasn’t ever fought in?
If you can rank Hopkins above Canelo at Super Middleweight, why not **** Tiger above Canelo? Why not Carlos Monzon? Why not Billy Conn? Why stop at Hopkins? Why don’t we just rank anyone who’s never fought there aswell?Comment
-
You haven’t addressed the fact that Hopkins never fought at Super Middleweight and why it’s illogical to rank him there in general, much less higher than the likes of Canelo once.
So if I were to rank **** Tiger ahead of Andre Ward at Super Middleweight, what are your thoughts on that? Would that be justified?Comment
-
I don’t think you understand what the notion of addressing a point meansYou haven’t addressed the fact that Hopkins never fought at Super Middleweight and why it’s illogical to rank him there in general, much less higher than the likes of Canelo once.
So if I were to rank **** Tiger ahead of Andre Ward at Super Middleweight, what are your thoughts on that? Would that be justified?Comment
-
Ward and Calzaghe are the only ones that would be debatable and noComment
-
Because you can’t address the points and instead deflect.
You rank fighters in weight class that have never fought there, you dumb cunt
Until you have a basis on how you could rank Hopkins at 168 then you should do yourself a favour and be quiet.Last edited by IronDanHamza; 12-10-2023, 03:11 AM.Comment
-
You have ZERO common sense. ZERO deduction skills. I bet you bought the Haney fight huh? Dumb a-ss. LOLComment
-
You are a fucking retard mate. There is no helping you.Comment
-
Comment
-
You’re talking about deduction abilities in regards to ranking fighters in a weight classDo you understand how RETARDED that is?
Did Hopkins ever fight at Super Middleweight? No.
So can he logically be ranked there ahead of fighters who were undisputed champion there? No.
Very simple.
If we are going to start ranking fighters who never fought at weight classes at said weight class historically then we may as well just rank anyone anywhere.
If Hopkins is ahead of Canelo at SMW, then surely so is **** Tiger? Or is he not? Does it only work for Hopkins in your warped, empty brain?
Comment
Comment