Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather vs Pacquiao Eyed For March 13, 2010?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
    yea..I concur.

    Comment


    • #72
      This is really disrespectful to Cotto damm, This should give cotto more fuel to KO pacman

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by p4p-champ View Post
        It should be 40% - 40% with the winner taking the extra 10%. Fair for both sides.
        lol.. you must not know how to count.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Al Haymon View Post
          OK. Even if i concede that there's a third-order possibility of a pac-mosley fight, what are the "several other" big fight possibilities for Pac?
          Ah.. Well here's an example. Mosley will most likely fight Berto in like the first quarter of next year...so what if Berto beats Mosley? That changes the equation doesn't it? Then the winner of Cotto/Pac could fight Berto..or Mayweather could conceivably fight the up and comer, Berto. Unlikely, yes, but within the realm of possibility. Now further imagine... Pac loses to Cotto... Mosley loses to Berto... then you have a likely matchup of May with Cotto or Berto... and Pac with Mosely or Berto..And by that time all that unfolds...Margarito may be back on the scene. And thats just one possible scenario.

          Syf, i think you aren't giving full weight to the business relationships between GBP, Team Mayweather and HBO. You are looking too narrowly.[/B]
          Perhaps.. But I also know these fickle money obsessed demons have no loyalty..If they spot a younger, less expensive to manage cash cow, they will sell Pac down the road in a Manilla second, even if he only slips up for a second. Same with Mayweather..or anybody.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Sin City View Post
            we are on a thread discussing a potential fight with mayweather and pacquiao and you are saying that he doesn't have a trend of fighting smaller fighters.. lol ironic.
            name these smaller fighters bro. list them all. since that his m-o...

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by p4p-champ View Post
              It should be 40% - 40% with the winner taking the extra 10%. Fair for both sides.
              get off the forums and into a math class

              40
              + 40
              + 10
              ____
              90


              you meant 45/45 winner getting an extra 10

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
                so because a guy has thicker thighs (no ****) this makes him bigger? lol ok..

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by COACH WEBB View Post
                  name these smaller fighters bro. list them all. since that his m-o...
                  hatton, marquez and now pacquiao.. I would say that's a trend.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
                    Well, Pacquiao will have to.
                    conquer sir

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Sin City View Post
                      so because a guy has thicker thighs (no ****) this makes him bigger? lol ok..
                      I said bigger or same size?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP