Mayweather vs Pacquiao Eyed For March 13, 2010?

[SOY-COMO-SOY]

This is ridiculous. Pacquiao has a fight with a guy named Miguel Cotto on Nov. 14. I don't know if you've heard of him or not.

****ing imbeciles.

I knew all these replies would piss off cotto stans.

[COACH WEBB]

**** floyd what has he done to deserve even a 50/50 split. Hang his ass out to dry and get SSM in there for the #1 WW spot. Pac is already #1P4P . I guess beating a LW in a boring ass fight and buying your in to the #2 spot is enough. lol... Fight wont happen. Pacquiao isnt getting his cars repoed and the IRS is not breathing down his neck. Pac wont budge. He knows he dont have too. Arum wont tolerate much and Mosley will be there scratching at the door. If Mayweather wants to prove hes the Man still. Put up or STFU! You cant win anything b!tching about money.

[Doctor_Tenma]

**** floyd what has he done to deserve even a 50/50 split. Hang his ass out to dry and get SSM in there for the #1 WW spot. Pac is already #1P4P . I guess beating a LW in a boring ass fight and buying your in to the #2 spot is enough. lol... Fight wont happen. Pacquiao isnt getting his cars repoed and the IRS is not breathing down his neck. Pac wont budge. He knows he dont have too. Arum wont tolerate much and Mosley will be there scratching at the door. If Mayweather wants to prove hes the Man still. Put up or STFU! You cant win anything b!tching about money.

IRS is still on Mayweather? I thought they got their money. Mayweather bitching? Mayweather hasn't even said Pacquiao's name in a while, nothing at all. I really don't understand where your getting all this.

[p4p-champ]

get off the forums and into a math class

40
+ 40
+ 10
____
90


you meant 45/45 winner getting an extra 10

lol yeah yeah, it was a typo....winner gets %20...you know what i meant.

[Tobi.G]

If TRUE .... It would be the most disgusting display of greed in the history of the sport. A fight of this magnatude has the potential to do unheard of PPV numbers and to let it slip through because one or the other guy wants 60 to 40 is just plain crazy.

Split it all right down the middle or winner gets 60%, loser gets 40%.

Make it happen.

I think thats wrong in boxing that a fighter get a guaranteed 60% purse or more, even if he loses. I think the winner of a fight should always get more than the loser, the winner should get at least 60% and the loser never more than 40%. In a big money fight 40% is still verry much money. I think that would be fair and it would motivate the fighters more to win and there would be less quitters, and manny lazy fighters would train better and come in better shape

[SOY-COMO-SOY]

lol yeah yeah, it was a typo....winner gets %20...you know what i meant.

lol i was just ****ing w/ ya.

imo 20% is too much.

like i said 45/45, winner gets an extra 10

[taino78]

Top Rank's Bob Arum told the Manila Bulletin on Monday that Manny Pacquiao's 2010 debut would fall in the second week of March. The working date of March 13 is being tossed around. Arum warned that Pacquiao, and everyone else, should not look past the November 14 clash with WBO welterweight champion Miguel Cotto. [details]

this is too similar to 2001 when trinidad was already being set up to fight jones jr b4 he even stepped in the ring with hopkins. tito was on a hot streak cleaning out his division and blew out joppy just like pac is doing now. we all know what happened that night. trinidad was thrown into waters he had no business swimming in. size does matter when the bigger guy can box. need examples just ask.

[SOY-COMO-SOY]

I think thats wrong in boxing that a fighter get a guaranteed 60% purse or more, i think the winner of a fight should always get more than the loser, the winner should get at least 60% and the loser never more than 40%. I think that would be fair and it would motivate the fighters more to win and there would be less quitters.

how about if the winner got the decission, but lost the fight. diaz/malignaggi

[Ravishing]

just keeping it real brah. im a equal opportunity "hater." Just look at my avatar ffs.

"...as I sip this soda that someone probably already spit in..."

LOL

[madsweeney]

I think thats wrong in boxing that a fighter get a guaranteed 60% purse or more, even if he loses. I think the winner of a fight should always get more than the loser, the winner should get at least 60% and the loser never more than 40%. I think that would be fair and it would motivate the fighters more to win and there would be less quitters.

Or you'd see more missmatches (like PBF/JMM) for people to ensure they get paid