If Hopkins / Calzaghe rematched ...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #81
    Originally posted by S a m u r a i
    I can't be bothered with you, dude. Don't take it personal, though. Our discussions rarely go anywhere, that's all.
    No Calzaghe discussion goes far with you...especially when your making claims that only a 200lb + man could beat Calzaghe.

    Comment

    • MUNG
      Death Dealer
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 4183
      • 438
      • 79
      • 31,567

      #82
      I still cant understand how people actually think hopkins won that fight!! Round 4 was close but calzaghe took over the middle of the fight and the end to win a clear decision imo

      Hopkins resorting to faking low blows was disgraceful, he tried everything to spoil that fight and really should have been warned

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #83
        Originally posted by S a m u r a i
        "His fans"? No, I was the one who said it'd take a cruiser or a heavyweight to put him down and keep him on the canvas. As hes never been kept on the canvas at SMW or light heavy for more than a few seconds, I think I have a good point right here.
        You don't. Hopkins and Jones aren't big punchers yet both managed to do it. One could argue then that it can be done by a big puncher at 175.

        Comment

        • one-Punch
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 3130
          • 221
          • 224
          • 9,866

          #84
          I think it would be close to another split decision. Could go either way.

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #85
            Originally posted by Songbird
            I still cant understand how people actually think hopkins won that fight!! Round 4 was close but calzaghe took over the middle of the fight and the end to win a clear decision imo

            Hopkins resorting to faking low blows was disgraceful, he tried everything to spoil that fight and really should have been warned
            Whether you think he won or lost, that was the first time I saw someone out-MAN Bernard Hopkins. End of story. Didn't score the fight but I had him the loser in a close one. A rematch would've been nice.

            Comment

            • street bully
              Tua's daddy.
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 25014
              • 697
              • 263
              • 35,118

              #86
              Originally posted by The Boy Wonder
              Because Calzaghe was a spring chicken right?

              Batman, you're talking ****.

              Actually no. I think I am the ONLY Hopkins fan who gives Joe credit, but Joe was never considered past it, and put on his best performance against Kessler a few months prior to Hopkins. Like Hopkins Calzaghe entered his peak in his 30s. Lets not compare 36 o 43. You do know that a 35 Hopkins was afair bit different from the 44 year old version.

              Comment

              • Kris Silver
                Kneel 4 Silver,good boy!
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 7798
                • 1,073
                • 3,581
                • 27,245

                #87
                The fight on the cards of the judges even, was a mere point or two off from being a UD.

                It'd be a very clear UD 2nd time around.

                Calzaghe wouldn't need to spend the usual 4 rounds adapting and losing a few rounds.

                He's sussed Hopkins style, how to handle his tactics and would not fair as poorly for him as he did last time around.

                So all in all, he'd win a clear UD and I think that's undeniably the most likely.

                Hopkins simply is not busy enough to defeat Calzaghe. They're a poor style match up for each other but Calzaghe gets it because he's got a tough chin, doesn't run too much, adapts well, throws loads of punches, and unlike Taylor doesn't tire late on. To the contrary, he gets better.

                Comment

                • Smash
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 16338
                  • 6,600
                  • 7,978
                  • 21,172

                  #88
                  It was a hard fight to watch and score but after watching it again my opinion is that it was FAIRLY close but with calzaghe winning by 2 or so rounds, hopkins did not do enough to win that fight and his tactics were a bit embarassing at times. He badly lost his way in the middle rounds and finished poorly as well.

                  Comment

                  • street bully
                    Tua's daddy.
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 25014
                    • 697
                    • 263
                    • 35,118

                    #89
                    Originally posted by KrisSilver
                    The fight on the cards of the judges even, was a mere point or two off from being a UD.

                    It'd be a very clear UD 2nd time around.

                    Calzaghe wouldn't need to spend the usual 4 rounds adapting and losing a few rounds.

                    He's sussed Hopkins style, how to handle his tactics and would not fair as poorly for him as he did last time around.

                    So all in all, he'd win a clear UD and I think that's undeniably the most likely.

                    Hopkins simply is not busy enough to defeat Calzaghe. They're a poor style match up for each other but Calzaghe gets it because he's got a tough chin, doesn't run too much, adapts well, throws loads of punches, and unlike Taylor doesn't tire late on. To the contrary, he gets better.
                    So Hopkins a 1D guy who doesn't adapt to opponents? It depends on how you score rounds really, if you like workrate and flurried albeit if they land or not then you give it to Calzaghe.

                    Comment

                    • Chunk..
                      Shot To ****!
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2007
                      • 32228
                      • 687
                      • 163
                      • 47,451

                      #90
                      Hopkins had the perfect plan in place. He neutralised Calzaghe more then Czalghe neutralised him IMO but he was 43 years old. Going 12 rounds with Calzaghe is a mission in itself, never mind beating him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP