Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo on Loss to Bivol: I Was Very Hurt by the Defeat; In the End You Have to Accept It

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by landotter View Post
    In a way, I am excited for this Charlo fight just so we can stop rehashing this. Bivol won. The scorecards were close, the fight was not. No shame in that. Canelo was not beat down, and just knows to hang at 168 and 160. No worries. The rematch is not going to happen unless Bivol drops his belt and moves down to 168 to chase it.

    Canelo lost, Bivol did not get his rematch. They are both out something. Now can we move on?
    Two things though

    1) Canelo will never make 160 ever again
    2) Bivol tried to move down to chase it and that wasn't good either.


    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by budfr View Post

      Why? No humiliation, the bigger Bivol could not KO a natural 154 lber. Typical Canelo hater, you secretly envy him, azzwipe.
      Nelo finally accepted and admitted the humiliating defeat... in his own words, "it hurts"....

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post

        You didn`t speak like that before the fight. You expected him to beat Bivol and challenge Usyk. Stop with this silly damage control.

        I give a ginger no credit for trying.
        Nope. I always said Bivol was a very dangerous fight for him. Stop making things up.

        As for Usyk all I said was that Canelo had earned that fight if it’s what he wanted. And that IF he beat Usyk people still wouldn’t give him full credit and would claim he was ducking someone else.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

          There’s no “appearance” of anything. Either Bivol is a tough fight to take or he is not. Which one is it?
          Bivol is a great fighter and always was. ,But he's a guy who looks easier than he is. Just like all u dumb asses who were saying for years and years that Bud hasn't fought anyone, that he's a bum, he's hype, he has no chin, he got exposed by Gamboa, calling him crawfish, etc. And he showed his greatness, just like Bivol did on Canelo's face
          eco1 eco1 JakeTheBoxer JakeTheBoxer like this.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

            Losses mean very little. Liam Smith best c hrisy eubank, so people concluded Liam Smith was a better fighter. Now eubanks beat smith, eubanks is the better fighter and just had off night.
            Some may think Floyd's better h2h than pac, but once pac beat floyd in rematch, people would assume pac just had off night, many think pac won first fight as it is.
            So again, losses mean very little, other than you were better on the day, or luckier on the day. Bivols not greater than nelo, anymore than Floyd's greater than Nell because they have a win over nelo
            You’re an idiot. Plain and simple.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by just the facts View Post

              You’re an idiot. Plain and simple.
              I said nothing wrong just facts. Your a floyd fanatic pure and simple. You cannot refute anything ive said.
              Rematches tell us more,and as floyd didn't do them he's a mystery, an enigma. Hard to say where floyd is in history.
              I mean the first duran v srl, was what SRL did wrong in first fight and he corrected mistakes in 2nd and 3rd fight. SRR corrected his mistakes against Turpin. Floyd refusing to allow his fellow ATG win rematch don't make floyd great, opposite in fact along lines of smoke and mirrors
              Last edited by hugh grant; 09-17-2023, 08:40 AM.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by archiemoore1 View Post

                Bivol is a great fighter and always was. ,But he's a guy who looks easier than he is. Just like all u dumb asses who were saying for years and years that Bud hasn't fought anyone, that he's a bum, he's hype, he has no chin, he got exposed by Gamboa, calling him crawfish, etc. And he showed his greatness, just like Bivol did on Canelo's face
                So just give full credit to Canelo for fighting a great fighter, then.

                Crawford’s resume was mostly crap until Spence (who may have diminished himself by making the weight one too many times.) The eye test isn’t absolute proof of greatness.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

                  I said nothing wrong just facts. Your a floyd fanatic pure and simple. You cannot refute anything ive said.
                  Rematches tell us more,and as floyd didn't do them he's a mystery, an enigma. Hard to say where floyd is in history.
                  I mean the first duran v srl, was what SRL did wrong in first fight and he corrected mistakes in 2nd and 3rd fight. SRR corrected his mistakes against Turpin. Floyd refusing to allow his fellow ATG win rematch don't make floyd great, opposite in fact along lines of smoke and mirrors
                  One thing for sure, fraud picked his fights carefully, but when something went wrong, ala castillo and maidana, he rematch them. All other fights wasn't no need to play it again.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

                    I said nothing wrong just facts. Your a floyd fanatic pure and simple. You cannot refute anything ive said.
                    Rematches tell us more,and as floyd didn't do them he's a mystery, an enigma. Hard to say where floyd is in history.
                    I mean the first duran v srl, was what SRL did wrong in first fight and he corrected mistakes in 2nd and 3rd fight. SRR corrected his mistakes against Turpin. Floyd refusing to allow his fellow ATG win rematch don't make floyd great, opposite in fact along lines of smoke and mirrors
                    In your ******ity, losses mean nothing. That tells me how dumb you are. Your and idiot plain and simple. I don’t have time to read dumb posts from a moron.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                      So just give full credit to Canelo for fighting a great fighter, then.

                      Crawford’s resume was mostly crap until Spence (who may have diminished himself by making the weight one too many times.) The eye test isn’t absolute proof of greatness.
                      Eye test, huh? Anytime u see someone who fought 40 pro fights, and every one they fought has a different style, and he beats them all in a different way, from different stances, using different punches and combinations, and when u watch it, it looks like that asswhipping was taylor-made for that opponent, that's a sign not that the opponents are crap, but that Bud is very skillful, and not only able to figure out exactly what to do, but also to execute it with perfect timing, no matter who the opponent is. Spence doesn't get a weight pass. That man has been a drinker, and Bud doesn't drink or smoke and when u don't do that, and you eat, sleep and live the life of a boxer like Bud does, it gives u the kind of true confidence that only comes when u know u don't ever take any shortcuts, and you'll be very hard to beat, no matter who the opponent is. He's on a different level condition-wise, discipline-wise, coordination-wise, reflexes-wise, punch resistance-wise, mentally, etc, and that's way b4 u even get to the skill part. He's much more skillful than his opponents, and his IQ, his ability to out think and out manuever them is on another level. If u still cannot see that, then u never will
                      Last edited by archiemoore1; 09-17-2023, 12:52 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP