Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Thurman Says Crawford Didn't Beat 'Real Champion' In Spence, Claims He Would Have Wiped Errol Too

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by peplz View Post

    You’ve typed like six fictional tabloid articles. How in the world are YOU talking about anybody typing essays? And repeating the same lie over and over again about him not having any meaningful fights will not make it magically become true. You’re whole point is premised on a straight up lie. Making up s h i t, making biased assumptions and jumping to false self serving conclusions exposes y’all’s pathological need to try to save face after being proven wrong. You’re just some kind of PBC comment board activist that’s hoping to affect people’s perceptions by pushing false narratives. Y’all tried to do this for the last five years before the fight happened and it didn’t work. I don’t know how you think its going to work now after the fight has happened and Spence took the beating that he took. Talking about what goes on behind closed doors and promoters and free agents and business management and a bunch of nonsense that no boxing fan actually cares about is just a desperate attempt at trying to save face for the fact that Terence Crawford proved all of y’all wrong and exposed “the other side of the street” in the process.
    Proven wrong about what dude? What are you even talking about? Crawford beating Spence proved he was the better fighter at least that night. You think that changes anything before that?

    Name me his career defining fight before Spence?

    Comment


    • #72
      Thurman lost to a geriatric pacquaio now he is giving himself a theoretical win over spence. lmao


      thurman should fight that woman boxer next fight so he can get an actual win again

      Comment


      • #73
        The guy who lost to a 40 year old manny thinks he would have beaten spence. Kid is on crack

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by satiev1 View Post
          The guy who lost to a 40 year old manny thinks he would have beaten spence. Kid is on crack
          He pointed out a specific version of Spence, and he may very well be right the jury is still out on all of this stuff with Spence, it did look like a lot of guys would have beat Errol that night, so many, and I mean lots, of fighters trainers etc think Spence was drained or had something wrong with him I don't think it will have any kind of ending until they both fight again not necessarily with each other just need to see the progression of that performance with both of them, for some reason youre terrified of Spence not being right, I don't think it takes anything away from TC at all he did what he said he would do.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by roadblock View Post

            he pointed out a specific version of spence, and he may very well be right the jury is still out on all of this stuff with spence, it did look like a lot of guys would have beat errol that night, so many, and i mean lots, of fighters trainers etc think spence was drained or had something wrong with him i don't think it will have any kind of ending until they both fight again not necessarily with each other just need to see the progression of that performance with both of them, for some reason youre terrified of spence not being right, i don't think it takes anything away from tc at all he did what he said he would do.
            Lol you're really trying hard to make yourself feel better with that bs again. Bud and the spence loss still has you up at night i see. You were wrong on the outcome. Get over it.
            Last edited by satiev1; 09-15-2023, 10:30 AM.

            Comment


            • #76
              I wish these three just fought, I hate this record protecting era.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP