I think Thurman needs to go back in time where he belongs and fight Devon Alexander, Victor Ortiz, and Andre Berto. Oh, and a rematch with Robert Guerrero.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Thurman Says Crawford Didn't Beat 'Real Champion' In Spence, Claims He Would Have Wiped Errol Too
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by SteveM View PostUsed to like Thurman. Now he is a deluded troll worse than the worst posters on here.SteveM likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
What happen to Terrence Crawford being "barely a welterweight"
Danny Garcia and Keith Thurman haven't been relevant in years. You guys are delusional. Terrence been calling you guys out for 5 years and all you wanted to is fight each other. Please retire
Comment
-
Originally posted by peplz View Post
All of that you just said has already been debunked and people who talk like this will only go down in history as delusional haters. You’re using the words of a corrupt promoter to justify the corrupt practices of another promoter and bashing the fighter. Celebrating the fighter is “drinking the kool-aid” but having an irrational allegiance to a promoter and a broadcast network is “common sense”? You make kool-aid sound like a healthy beverage. You’re mad at Terence Crawford but in love with PBC and all of their slick deception and crooked plots. You promote the promoter and demote the fighter. Y’all PBC fans really completely lost the plot.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TheWinners View Post
I'm not in love with PBC. You won't comprehend the obvious. PBC and Top Rank are rivals. You call Arum a corrupt promoter. However Crawford had the opportunity to control his own career after failing to have any career defining fights under Bob Arum and he resigned with this same promoter. Keep drinking the Kool aid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
no lies detected.
You still sooo upset that Crawford Knocked out Spence
Sheeesh
Get over it
LolLast edited by greeneye99; 10-20-2023, 07:06 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by peplz View Post
“After failing to have any career defining fights” is just a straight up lie that only delusional haters repeat. You don’t know what Crawford had the opportunity to do or not do. You’re just filling in the blanks with biased assumptions. And why is it that this supposed rivalry between Top Rank and PBC didn’t apply to Tyson Fury and Jeff Horn, who are both promoted by Top Rank? You might have a slight point to make if this whole “other side of the street” excuse was being applied across the board and it wasn’t mostly about Terence Crawford. You are ignoring cold hard facts. And if you have to do that to make your point it kinda comes off as an admission of knowing that your wrong but deciding to push a false narrative anyway. But I’m sure you’re not the only one. So keeping doubling down on the nonsense. I hope it feels good.
What facts am i ignoring? You are ignoring the facts and this is old. The false narrative is that Crawford was left out to dry and everyone avoided him. The truth is he made poor career decisions and thought too highly of himself without having the backing. And he had an opportunity to leave Top Rank years ago, who he eventually sued . He decided to stay and collect nice paydays but fight average comp.
Now he's being a hypocrite and not giving Boots a shot because he hasn't fought anyone. Which was true about him at 147 til he fought Porter and Spence although they were not in their primes. And him claiming he would never fight Garcia and Thurman because he is the top dog and they're washed exposes the reality that if he was in their position as Top 147 lb fighters he would not have given them a shot then either.
**** is easy if you remove emotional bias and think logically.
Comment
-
Thurman should've stayed active and relevant in the division,
instead of begging for paydays now from people who have worked hard.
'One Time' Thurman fought One time in the last 3 years.
And avoided anybody of consequence.
Keith will be 35 soon and knows he needs one last payday.
It's desperation time.
Comment
Comment