Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: 100% Usyk Milked It, He Hates It To The Body, But It Was a Low Blow

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by chicken- View Post

    I'm not "for" either fighter, I'm for the rules, which means it was clearly a low blow and there's no valid argument otherwise. People are just used to refs allowing work in that area because so many fighters wear their trunks too high. Usyk's belly button was visible at times in the fight (contrary to the story that people have come up with that he pulled them up after the fight was over).
    Hey, I personally agree it was a low blow from the videos I've seen. It was on the belt, but below the belly button. Some people will screen cap a specific angle to make it look higher, but watching it in real time or slow motion in entirely, you can see it was low.

    If there was no such thing as video replay, I would certainly be upset and feel it could have been a clean shot because it happens quick and hard to tell in real time in the moment. I just think haters wish the replay wasn't out there and can continue to argue that Usyk should have lost by KO on that.
    Monty Fisto Monty Fisto buge buge like this.

    Comment


    • #22
      I don't watch either of these fighters although I have seen Usyk twice before I haven't seen any of Debois's fights. This was a good body shot on the belt line which was high to begin with. Also someone said the ref didn't have a good angle but he actually did so either he made a bad call or protected Usyk. It would be interesting to see the indications he gave just before the fight starts

      Comment


      • #23
        legal or not, the shot was nowhere near the balls, yet Usyk writhed in pain like it was a nut shot. Very similar to how soccer players fall down and writhe in pain like they've been shot from a minor collision. Poor sportsmanship displayed by Usyk
        Last edited by baroidi; 08-30-2023, 04:40 PM.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
          It was low as ref said it was.But if it landed 2 inches higher it would've knocked him down too, so it's an official knockdown imo
          What the *** did I just read?
          jackblack008 jackblack008 buge buge like this.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

            Yeh I'm not too bad thanks. I'm just saying regardless where it landed, usyk s on canvas
            That's good.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post

              What the *** did I just read?
              It came out wrong. Where ever that punch would have landed, usyk s on canvas. But it's not an official knockdown. So usyk is glad it landed low
              Last edited by hugh grant; 08-30-2023, 06:18 PM.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by -DSG- View Post
                It landed below the belly button.
                How can you tell though?



                We both know that was right on the money now don't we?

                Originally posted by Eddie Hearn
                And by the way, [Usyk] was very clever after the fight - he pulls his shorts down to show where his shorts are, which was about that far below the belly button [several inches] - which in the fight it wasn't, it was probably on the belly button.
                Hearn says exactly what I've been saying, wow =---> who knew?

                Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post

                What the *** did I just read?
                What you read was how Boxingscene melds past and present quotes like they happened at the same time.​ Have you not seen them report old quotes in new articles?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by War Room View Post
                  What you read was how Boxingscene melds past and present quotes like they happened at the same time.​ Have you not seen them report old quotes in new articles?

                  no, haven’t noticed that. What’s always bothered me is how they’ll milk one interview into 15 different articles/stories

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post


                    no, haven’t noticed that. What’s always bothered me is how they’ll milk one interview into 15 different articles/stories
                    Keep an eye on it, a quote will air, then later on they'll include it in another article weeks or months later like it happened at that time.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by War Room View Post

                      Keep an eye on it, a quote will air, then later on they'll include it in another article weeks or months later like it happened at that time.
                      Like they merged threads? or something different? Because I notice weird **** when they merge threads.


                      Still waiting for them to fix that weird symbol **** that happens when I post from my phone.


                      EDIT - Oh I think I know what you mean, Like they'll include something from an interview months back into a new article?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP