Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Frank Warren on Usyk-Dubois: We Will Lobby The WBA To Declare it a No-Contest

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Mooshashi View Post
    Bricktop ain't gonna like this from Carl Froch who quite correctly defines what a low blow is and the fact that yes, it WAS a low blow that put Usyk down.
    I'll take Froch's opinion over anyone in here.

    A bunch of pros also called it a clean shot.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Raggamuffin View Post
      A bunch of pros also called it a clean shot.

      Which is why it is controversial. A borderline shot that could have gone either way, so yeah, there will be differences of opinion on it.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Mooshashi View Post


        Which is why it is controversial. A borderline shot that could have gone either way, so yeah, there will be differences of opinion on it.
        He was knocked out and you know it, lmao…

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Raggamuffin View Post
          So how did Warren cheat Lefena lmao? There was no 3 knockdown rule for that fight. I know the rules. Nobody cares about Dubois quitting. He tried and he lost. He has his own reasons, you don’t. But that doesn’t excuse the fact that Usyk was put down and out by what I thought was a legal shot…and saved by a ref who had a bad night.
          Doesn't matter what you think. The shot was low and he was given tome to recover. Those are the rules. I thought you knew that?

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by M312 View Post

            Doesn't matter what you think. The shot was low and he was given tome to recover. Those are the rules. I thought you knew that?
            The shot was called low, but cry babies like you called it low because you like the fighter, lmao. I don’t care one way or the other and always call it like I see it. I like Usyk, but I found out that he can’t take a body shot. You did too. And when he fights Fury, he’ll be exposed for that weakness.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Raggamuffin View Post

              The shot was called low, but cry babies like you called it low because you like the fighter, lmao. I don’t care one way or the other and always call it like I see it. I like Usyk, but I found out that he can’t take a body shot. You did too. And when he fights Fury, he’ll be exposed for that weakness.
              I called it legal and then changed my mind in hindsight after seeing the evidence - despite crybabies like you saying otherwise even though the evidence is clear, just because you like Fury

              Comment


              • #47
                It’s ridiculous this statement of “beltline” because these modern trunks have like 8” worth of elastic waistband and ride up all night. Nobody in the real world has a belt that thick or wears it that high unless you are santa clause.
                It didn’t land close to the groin or on the thigh. Where it landed if it was truly low I don’t see how it could have hurt so much? Do people want to say it was more on the hip and thigh? It was definitely fully on the waist protector. I mean look how big these HW gloves are, what part qualifies as landing? They are a foot across the knuckles. This just proves why fighters wear their shorts so high abd with such massive elastic waists. What’s to stop fighters from bringing their waist guards aka kidney protectors up into covering legal shots? Noting, because they already do. Why not make the waist line on your shorts padded too? Anyone ever check that? Wear thick leather shorts. Padded fleece. Studded shorts. Bedazzle them. Two inch thick embroidered lettering. Carbon fibre. Ballistic material.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by M312 View Post

                  I called it legal and then changed my mind in hindsight after seeing the evidence - despite crybabies like you saying otherwise even though the evidence is clear, just because you like Fury
                  Fury is the best. And Usyk won’t be able to protect his body from Fury,lmao. And I don’t believe that you called it legal You tried that lying bull**** saying Warren cheated Lerena excuse so it goes both ways I guess lmao saying that Dubois lost by first round ko knowing that the fight didn’t have a 3 knockdown rule, lmao. So I supposed to believe you now, lmao. Please…

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Blond Beast View Post
                    It’s ridiculous this statement of “beltline” because these modern trunks have like 8” worth of elastic waistband and ride up all night. Nobody in the real world has a belt that thick or wears it that high unless you are santa clause.

                    !!!!

                    It didn’t land close to the groin or on the thigh. Where it landed if it was truly low I don’t see how it could have hurt so much? Do people want to say it was more on the hip and thigh? It was definitely fully on the waist protector. I mean look how big these HW gloves are, what part qualifies as landing? They are a foot across the knuckles. This just proves why fighters wear their shorts so high abd with such massive elastic waists. What’s to stop fighters from bringing their waist guards aka kidney protectors up into covering legal shots? Noting, because they already do. Why not make the waist line on your shorts padded too? Anyone ever check that? Wear thick leather shorts. Padded fleece. Studded shorts. Bedazzle them. Two inch thick embroidered lettering. Carbon fibre. Ballistic material.
                    Santa Clause!!!??? Now that’s funny lol…

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Raggamuffin View Post
                      Fury is the best. And Usyk won’t be able to protect his body from Fury,lmao. And I don’t believe that you called it legal You tried that lying bull**** saying Warren cheated Lerena excuse so it goes both ways I guess lmao saying that Dubois lost by first round ko knowing that the fight didn’t have a 3 knockdown rule, lmao. So I supposed to believe you now, lmao. Please…
                      Ohhhh, there we go. You're entire opinion is based on a love for Tyson Fury. Nothing else. You sad, sad loser.

                      I saw Dubois lose against Lerena. There is no doubt that fight should have been stopped and it was rigged. I also saw what I thought was legal shot in this fight and was gutted for Daniel, and then changed my mind in hindsight. It was low. I don't have a dog in the fight, just call it as I see it.

                      But I see your opinion is entirely based on your love for Tyson. Ffs, what a waste of my time.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP