Joe Calzaghe, Whats so great about him anyway?

[VipersThunder]

' I saw Hopkins as the winner '.

Shows the true intent of his article to be honest. He's not writing about Calzaghe and the fact that he was much better than his resume suggests. No. He's writing about Calzaghe's resume and dis*****g most of his best wins with **** like ' I thought Hopkins won '.

Well to be honest mate, I thought pigs could fly.

But they don't.

A lot of people thought Hopkins won, Does that make you angry?

[D-MiZe]

A lot of people thought Hopkins won, Does that make you angry?

No, I'm not a Calzaghe fan.

But it just shows the true intent of his article is to disprove and dispute Calzaghe's best wins.

[street bully]

I thought Hopkins edged Calzaghe, but lets not overlook the fact that Calzaghe is a GREAT fighter, not goodm but great.

[Shadows]

Biased against who?

Manny Pacquiao, Every non American of the Super Six, etc.

[Freddy Krueger]

Hopkins should have been dq'd, anyways neither looked great in that fight and Hopkins used his head more then he did his fists.

[daggum]

No, I'm not a Calzaghe fan.

But it just shows the true intent of his article is to disprove and dispute Calzaghe's best wins.

the title is joe calzaghe whats so great about him anyway?

that's basically the whole point to disprove him. it's an opinion piece on why he's not great. if your best "win" is really a loss then maybe he has a point.

[daggum]

did u cast your vote on the poll?

i refuse to vote since greatest of all time was not an option

[Bigchill79]

Very distasteful thread. IMHO.

[street bully]

Hopkins should have been dq'd, anyways neither looked great in that fight and Hopkins used his head more then he did his fists.

Come on Castor. Joe was even diriter in that fight. He admitted he lowblowed Hopkins numerous times on purpose.

[VipersThunder]

Very distasteful thread. IMHO.

I didn't write the article.