Anyone really thinks AJ can beat wilder?

[hhh1200]

Yep because Wilder is actually one cashing out just like Spence and Jermell. If he wanted to fight, he could have fought Ruiz. Guarantee he is going to say, I don't need a tune up. Amazing how an active fighter like AJ is the one who is cashing out. You have to wonder about boxing fans. AJ 6-8 stoppage. Wilder has no jab like Hellboy, just stand around waiting for a rusty right hand while AJ pieces him up with combos till a stoppage.

[NYG]

Did i just see two guys in this thread post pictures of other people claiming it was actually them? Are you guys serious? Lmao

[Kzbox]

Did i just see two guys in this thread post pictures of other people claiming it was actually them? Are you guys serious? Lmao

I was clearly taking the piss and got that picture off google like i would post my pic on here lmao dunno if that pic is actually him though nor do i care.

[Pac=Duran]

Who cares? I want to see this fight. The build up will be tastey.

I doubt Wilder will do a FaceOff on Sky though, after Fury gave him an exorcism

[NYG]

I was clearly taking the piss and got that picture off google like i would post my pic on here lmao dunno if that pic is actually him though nor do i care.

I would hope someone wouldn't go that far and post a picture of themselves on a boxing forum lmao

[Willow The Wisp]

I don't think anyone really believes the first Fury-Wilder bout was a legitimate draw, and it's not much of a feat to "at least" draw with a man who then KO'd you twice afterwards.

They share, I believe, only three common opponents, and it's not true that Wilder did better on all occasions - AJ made much easier work of Eric Molina.

Regardless, such matters aren't terribly important, as triangular logic means nothing in boxing.

What is your acertion here? That styles make fights? That anyone "really believing the first Fury-Wilder bout was a legitimate draw" holds any meaning? (It WAS a draw, and the damage was all one-way), Or that you think that Joshua should be favored against Wilder in January?
In any event, it may be your summation of the Fury - Wilder trilogy skims over the element that serves as the headline, that in two of those fights Wilder FOUR TIMES came within a referee's call of scoring a knockout.
We would not want to imply any narrative that excludes the piece where Tyson Fury survived by a wisper. These fights were epics, not beatings. (Save for Wilder's off-night in fight 2).

Taking longer to get rid of "stay-sharp" opponent Eric Molina notwithstanding, in aggregate Wilder's simply done better against their sampling of common opponents.

[QueensburyRules]

Turned who into soft lads? AJ fans are the ones so emotionally invested in him they twist narratives and make up stuff to defend him. AJ looks terrible these days and loses to both Fury/Wilder deal with it.

- - Already 2-0 vs both soft boys who twice turned down career purses to fight each there for peanuts.

Hey, it OK U soft lad in love with fellow soft fighters. Embrace it to follow U beating bleating heart…

[Kzbox]

- - Already 2-0 vs both soft boys who twice turned down career purses to fight each there for peanuts.

Hey, it OK U soft lad in love with fellow soft fighters. Embrace it to follow U beating bleating heart…

Yeah because Wilder and Fury are clearly known for being soft with weak chins who can’t take a punch… oh no that’s actually AJ who has that reputation but keep on with your nonsense.

[champion4ever]

No, because AJ no longer puts his combination punches together. He is going to need them if he is going to defeat Deontay Wilder. One punch at a time is not going to get it done. Anthony Joshua isn't and never has been a one punch knockout artist but Deontay Wilder is.

[Guest]

What is your acertion here? That styles make fights? That anyone "really believing the first Fury-Wilder bout was a legitimate draw" holds any meaning? (It WAS a draw, and the damage was all one-way), Or that you think that Joshua should be favored against Wilder in January?
In any event, it may be your summation of the Fury - Wilder trilogy skims over the element that serves as the headline, that in two of those fights Wilder FOUR TIMES came within a referee's call of scoring a knockout.
We would not want to imply any narrative that excludes the piece where Tyson Fury survived by a wisper. These fights were epics, not beatings. (Save for Wilder's off-night in fight 2).

Taking longer to get rid of "stay-sharp" opponent Eric Molina notwithstanding, in aggregate Wilder's simply done better against their sampling of common opponents.

There was no particular point I was making, other than to point out the original statements didn't hold water/have any real meaning in the conversation. Whether Wilder beats Joshua or vice versa, it has almost absolutely no relevance to how Wilder performed against Fury, or who beat Breazdale the quickest.


As for Wilder-Fury, I only gave Wilder one round in which he DIDN'T score a knockdown: the first of the third fight. Yes, the guy can crack - obviously - but a technical boxer he is not.