Comments Thread For: Spence Says Crawford Fight Negotiations Grueling, Tough Obstacles Due To Terence's Demands

[Monty Fisto]

Soooooo, your emotions flared up because I started my comment with "silly mfer"..........As I said, don't take my comments personally. I'm not calling you a "silly mfer".....it's just in the conversation like when someone says "bro" or "homie" or "buddy".....just the way I talk.....But I understand what you are saying. I apologize for that.

My point were definitely factual and the conversation was civil. I never threaten nor attacked you. At least not intentionally.

I know you are happy for me to leave the conversation. You used me saying "silly mfer" as a scapegoat to ignore the facts pointed out. You have no response to them because they don't run parallel with your agenda. It's all good.

I came back to apologize as again, I wasn't trying to attack you. Peace.

I appreciate we must have a different approach to discourse. I also appreciate you saying you apologise. You do seem convinced I am "emotional," but I am not. I simply would rather in a discussion that we shoot down the argument, not the man making the argument.

If I say "x", you can say "x is a weak, because of this and that" and that makes sense. It doesn't make sense to say "x is emotional", especially if x is a hard fact like Errol Spence Jr is a unified champion at WW and Bud Crawford holds one belt that he attained with his first fight at WW and has never progressed to achieving more. Spence holding more belts and Crawford one is documented history. It's objective, like three is more than one. There is no emotion there. Unless someone starts getting upset that 3 is more than 1. Yes, that would be you.

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

I appreciate we must have a different approach to discourse. I also appreciate you saying you apologise. You do seem convinced I am "emotional," but I am not. I simply would rather in a discussion that we shoot down the argument, not the man making the argument.

If I say "x", you can say "x is a weak, because of this and that" and that makes sense. It doesn't make sense to say "x is emotional", especially if x is a hard fact like Errol Spence Jr is a unified champion at WW and Bud Crawford holds one belt that he attained with his first fight at WW and has never progressed to achieving more. Spence holding more belts and Crawford one is documented history. It's objective, like three is more than one. There is no emotion there. Unless someone starts getting upset that 3 is more than 1. Yes, that would be you.

Well in order for me to shoot down the argument, I have to disagree with what was said.... You didn't see me rebuttal the fact Spence has 3 titles and Crawford has one....That would be silly because we all can see that. I point out the facts that people choose to ignore to place Spence on a pedestal and belittle Crawford as you were trying to do. Everyone who isn't a PBC diehard support knew that Crawford was being blackballed from fighting the PBC champions. Thurman had zero interest in getting in the ring with Crawford until 2 weeks after he lost to Manny. Then he goes on social media demanding a contract. Porter was on national television after beating Ugas and asked repeatedly about who he was interested in fighting. He wouldn't give a straight answer, speaking in general about the PBC title holders. Then he was asked specifically about Crawford...he wouldn't even say Crawford's name....after he lost to Spence and realize Spence wasn't interested in an immediate rematch and was negotiating with Danny, his daddy took to social media questioning Crawford why he won't get in the ring with his son. Danny turned down an official offer of $3M guaranteed. Didn't even counter offer. He and his daddy confirmed that's what they did. We all knew Manny had zero interest in getting in the ring vs Crawford since the Postol fight. Freddy Roach advised Manny to go another direction. Hell, even when Manny claimed he was interested in fighting Crawford, he demanded $28M....Bob Arum agreed and the following week, that demand somehow turned into $40M......DURING THE PANDEMIC when fans weren't allowed in the arena.

Spence having 3 belts and Crawford having 1 is factual. It would be ignorant to argue that as it's clearly evident that this is a reality.....Just like everything I stated above.... I didn't have my eyes close during this whole Spence vs Crawford timeline. As things came up, I paid attention. The articles are still available if one chooses to use their WiFi to research. But it seems more and more, people aren't interested in any facts that go against their opinions and/or agenda. They support YouTube channels that express whatever notion they are pushing as if because one has a YouTube channel, then what they express is LAW.

At the end of all of it.......THIS is the fight many of us fans have been begging for. I don't care who kept it from happening and who is responsible for it occurring now. I'm just happy it's finally here and I look forward to a historical night.