Should Teo be the first two weight undisputed champion

**crimsonfalcon07** · 06-11-2023, 11:24 PM

Originally posted by -MEGA-

Obviously he’s not. But he kinda should be though right?

No, because Taylor already lost to Catterall...

**Mammoth** · 06-11-2023, 11:34 PM

No because he wouldn't be the first and he's never been undisputed in any division. Taylor let his titles get stripped anyway.

**Mr Giggles** · 06-11-2023, 11:37 PM

No, cause Taylor lost to Catterall, technically

**famicommander** · 06-11-2023, 11:38 PM

1. Holyfield has already been undisputed at heavyweight and cruiserweight in the 3 belt era
2. Many people were undisputed in multiple weights in the two belt era and prior
3. Lopez was never undisputed at 135. Haney had the WBC belt.
4. Taylor got a gift against Catterall
5. Taylor had vacated 3 belts by the time of the Lopez fight

So no. No to all of that.

**Toffee** · 06-12-2023, 04:17 AM

He's not even a one time Undisputed Champion.

But the wins are the wins. Beating Loma and Taylor deserves huge credit. Fk the belts.

**The Big Dunn** · 06-12-2023, 04:26 AM

No because Loma dropped the belt to swerve Haney, imo he lost to Martin and imo Taylor lost to Catterall.

He still gets full credit for his wins over Loma and Faylor.

**The D3vil** · 06-12-2023, 10:43 PM

I already considered him the guy at 135 and now I consider him the guy at 140.

Let's be real, Loma was the guy at 135 before Teo beat him. Nobody respects that "Franchise belt" nonsense.

And Josh Taylor was legit undisputed & never lost, so yeah, to me, he's been undisputed at 2 weights

Should Teo be the first two weight undisputed champion