I think both have the same issue of blowing up and having weight cutting camps too many times. You can only do that so much before the body just gives up.
Will Errol Spence’s inactivity (15 months) affect him like it did Josh Taylor?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
So now we can mathematically measure chances of winning by either inverse or direct proportion. The longer the inactivity (15 months in this case), the lesser one's chances of doing well in one's next fight. We can also say the longer the inactivity, the more it gets worse. Who's fault exactly is it why people choose to go inactive?Comment
-
Boxers in this sport are not held accountable for choosing to be inactive. They even get automatic slack for not performing on par. Props are not even given for active fighters, who obviously take more risks. Active, inactive, they're treated the same by fans.So now we can mathematically measure chances of winning by either inverse or direct proportion. The longer the inactivity (15 months in this case), the lesser one's chances of doing well in one's next fight. We can also say the longer the inactivity, the more it gets worse. Who's fault exactly is it why people choose to go inactive?Comment

Comment