Fight Score - Loma Vs Haney - 880 Entries

[IronDanHamza]

Well compu box is not gospel thats for sure but in the fight u scored for canelo v ggg 1 your winner canelo got outlanded in 10 out of 12 rounds with 1 drawn compubox round

Close though weren't they, most of them.

That's another example of the term robbery being massively overused, much like it has been for this fight.

[IronDanHamza]

Compubox was way off. Loma outlanded Haney substantially in both rounds. Haney landed what, two good counters in round 7? Loma kept landing double left hands. If you really doubt that, watch the round and count the punches each fighter lands. You might be surprised by what you find. I was.

Like I said leave 2 and 7 out and swap them with 8 and 9.

There's at least 7 rounds you can argue for Haney, at least.

[crimsonfalcon07]

Well for starters he out landed him in Round 2 (according to compubox, not saying its gospel, just citing that fact)

Round 7 he did what he did almost every round outside of the ones he actually clearly lost (10 and 11), landed good body shots and sharp counters.

It's asinine to suggest that Loma clearly won those rounds.

Go back and rewatch those on slow speed. Even if we give him full credit for body shots that Loma used a body defense on, he still only landed 3 jabs and 10 power compared to 5 and 11 for Loma in round 2.

And come on, even the official judges gave Loma round 2. ALL of them. You're the one who places so much credence in the official judges, so one would think that would make it even harder to say that Haney gets round 2.

Seven was split 2-1 Haney by the official judges.

And you're so full of it when it comes to "close".

Want to talk dictionary?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/close

It's being used as an adjective here, and none of the relevant senses support your BS.

1. being near in time, space, effect, or degree

5. decided or won by a narrow margin.

8. having little space between items or units

Doesn't say anywhere that "it could go either way" or anything even remotely 'close'. There are no uses of the word that support the notion that either guy could have won in a close fight. It's not in the rules OR in the dictionary. You're just making things up again.

[Smash]

Close though weren't they, most of them.

That's another example of the term robbery being massively overused, much like it has been for this fight.

if someone is watching a fight and at the end of that fight that person sees, in their head, a clear winner, they might say oh thats a clear win for my guy, but the cards say win for the other guy, in that watchers head its a robbery so they come to here and say robbery because thats what they saw in their heads, the guy they thought lost given the W.

Now if they watch it again & still see the same result then in their heads it is a robbery. You say no its not a robbery because it was close, they say yeah it was close but i cant see how the other guy won so they still say robbery. Which basically means they think the wrong guy got the result and their guy was robbed of the win which they in their heads saw him achieving.

A robbery is when something is stolen from someone, the people who think the loser won think that the win was stolen from that loser because in their heads they saw him win. So it is a robbery, in their heads. You are saying its not a real robbery, but that your opinion and not shared by everyone.

[Smash]

Close though weren't they, most of them.

That's another example of the term robbery being massively overused, much like it has been for this fight.

So do you think if canelo outlanded ggg with those compubox stats the fight would be scored a draw?

[paulf]

You think it’s mentally deranged to want an overhaul in the scoring of fights?

Because two 115-113 cards didn't break in your guys favor?

Absolutely.

[IronDanHamza]

Go back and rewatch those on slow speed. Even if we give him full credit for body shots that Loma used a body defense on, he still only landed 3 jabs and 10 power compared to 5 and 11 for Loma in round 2.

And come on, even the official judges gave Loma round 2. ALL of them. You're the one who places so much credence in the official judges, so one would think that would make it even harder to say that Haney gets round 2.

Seven was split 2-1 Haney by the official judges.

And you're so full of it when it comes to "close".

Want to talk dictionary?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/close

It's being used as an adjective here, and none of the relevant senses support your BS.

1. being near in time, space, effect, or degree

5. decided or won by a narrow margin.

8. having little space between items or units

Doesn't say anywhere that "it could go either way" or anything even remotely 'close'. There are no uses of the word that support the notion that either guy could have won in a close fight. It's not in the rules OR in the dictionary. You're just making things up again.

I gave Loma round 2, but it's not a clear round for him.

Barely any of them were.

But I mean, you're arguing either way rounds don't exist whilst also telling me a out of 3 of the judges, they scored a round differently from one another

[IronDanHamza]

So do you think if canelo outlanded ggg with those compubox stats the fight would be scored a draw?

I have no idea. Nor does anyone.

[IronDanHamza]

if someone is watching a fight and at the end of that fight that person sees, in their head, a clear winner, they might say oh thats a clear win for my guy, but the cards say win for the other guy, in that watchers head its a robbery so they come to here and say robbery because thats what they saw in their heads, the guy they thought lost given the W.

Now if they watch it again & still see the same result then in their heads it is a robbery. You say no its not a robbery because it was close, they say yeah it was close but i cant see how the other guy won so they still say robbery. Which basically means they think the wrong guy got the result and their guy was robbed of the win which they in their heads saw him achieving.

A robbery is when something is stolen from someone, the people who think the loser won think that the win was stolen from that loser because in their heads they saw him win. So it is a robbery, in their heads. You are saying its not a real robbery, but that your opinion and not shared by everyone.

Another one of those "your truth" moments.

Neither fighter won 7 clear definitive rounds therefore it wasn't a robbery.

It's very simple.

[Noelanthony]

He doesn't understand the sport.

You were that twat that thought Loma beat Teofimo even though he failed to throw a meaningful punch in the first 6 rounds and nearly got knocked out in the 12th. No wonder you thought Haney fight was a robbery. Loma would have to get knocked out cold in the 12th and you would still call it a draw because he won most of the rounds prior