Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Josh Taylor: I'm Still King, Top Dog In 140 Division; Other Lads Have My Belts, Never Lost Them

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post

    Taylor beat Catterall, just like Haney beat Lomachenko.
    I disagree. You can make a case for Loma winning 7-5. I dont see how you can make a case for Taylor beating Catterall.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

      I disagree. You can make a case for Loma winning 7-5. I dont see how you can make a case for Taylor beating Catterall.
      But he did, didn`t he? Taylor got the win. I guess judges now it better than you and me.

      I know you have double standards and you think like Haney won and Taylor lost, but that is not true.
      Last edited by JakeTheBoxer; 06-08-2023, 07:08 AM.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post

        But he didn`t, didn`t he? Taylor got the win. I guess judges now it better than you and me.

        I know you have double standards and you think like Haney won and Taylor lost, but that is not true.
        Had nothing to do with a double standard. You’re purposely avoiding the point to make a case where there isnt one.

        The Haney v Loma fight was a close fight that 7-5 either way is supported by the official punch count in each round.

        Taylor v Catterall was not like that. Neither was Teo v Martin. Bob had them penciled in to fight had they won. They are both still with TR where Haney isnt.



        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by garfios View Post

          And you know that for sure. He can always fight the loser.
          Both fighters have already said it.

          And why would taylor wanna fight the loser for no title?

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Hustle View Post

            Both fighters have already said it.

            And why would taylor wanna fight the loser for no title?
            For the name?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by shaolin95 View Post

              Hahahahh Haney the man? Hahahahah that's a good one
              It does seem laughable. But he has the belts. So who is the man if not the guy with the belts?

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by garfios View Post

                For the name?
                You don't move up to fight a name off a loss.

                You won't get any credit.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Lost to Catterall, Josh... He's the real man in the division. Dropped all those belts pretending you were going to fight him, and here you are fighting Lopez instead.

                  Taylor got lots of business to take care of in this division before he can move up. If he leaves right as the new talent comes in, it will say a lot about him. Inoue moved up when he'd beaten everyone of note, and went straight to likely the best guy in the division. If Taylor can get past Lopez, he needs to rematch Catterall and beat him decisively, and take out some of the new blood.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Hustle View Post

                    You don't move up to fight a name off a loss.

                    You won't get any credit.
                    If that name is Crawford or Spence, he won't get credit, he will get beat up.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by garfios View Post

                      If that name is Crawford or Spence, he won't get credit, he will get beat up.
                      I agree.

                      That's why it makes no sense to fight the loser. High risk. No reward

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP