Comments Thread For: Savannah Marshall: Shields Needs Me, Won't Make as Much Money Fighting Anyone Else

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sid-Knee
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 18249
    • 1,091
    • 731
    • 155,532

    #11
    Originally posted by Jwil20
    This all makes sense if it’s an actual rivalry. Shields dominated.
    Shields dominated in a fight which should have been a draw? That's impressive.

    Comment

    • Sid-Knee
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 18249
      • 1,091
      • 731
      • 155,532

      #12
      Originally posted by BlackRobb
      The fighter who lost needs the one who won. That's usually how it works.
      Marshall didn't lose though. Neither of them did as it was a draw. Even you agree which is why you won't go over the rounds you gave to Shields.

      Comment

      • BlackRobb
        Truth Teller
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2022
        • 5078
        • 1,721
        • 1,850
        • 0

        #13
        Originally posted by Sid-Knee

        Marshall didn't lose though. Neither of them did as it was a draw. Even you agree which is why you won't go over the rounds you gave to Shields.
        I already scored the fight. It was never a draw. My first card was 7-3 Shields and after watching it a second time, I was able to sc**** another round for Marshall. If Shields got a UD in the UK with those crooked judges, that means a clear win for Shields. Gabriels had to take PEDs to feel she had a chance against Shields. I don't see anyone taking PEDs to compete with Savannah.

        Comment

        • PunchyPotorff
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2012
          • 10384
          • 525
          • 1,304
          • 49,687

          #14
          Originally posted by Gideon lock
          Stop crying Saveloy Marshall
          She's accept the loss, and just wants to fight again.
          And she knows the biggest money for both of them is a rematch. How is that crying?

          Comment

          • pretty ste
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 882
            • 199
            • 326
            • 17,437

            #15
            Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
            Former middleweight champion Savannah Marshall believes that a rematch with Claressa Shields will happen again. Last October, Marshall lost a ten round decision to Shields in their highly anticipated undisputed fight at 160-pounds.
            [Click Here To Read More]
            She got dominated no need for rematch move on savana you ain't good enough to beat shields

            Comment

            • M312
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2021
              • 2296
              • 1,001
              • 243
              • 0

              #16
              They always follow the money.

              Shields will rematch if they both keep winning. Why not?

              Comment

              • Sid-Knee
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 18249
                • 1,091
                • 731
                • 155,532

                #17
                Originally posted by BlackRobb

                I already scored the fight. It was never a draw. My first card was 7-3 Shields and after watching it a second time, I was able to sc**** another round for Marshall. If Shields got a UD in the UK with those crooked judges, that means a clear win for Shields. Gabriels had to take PEDs to feel she had a chance against Shields. I don't see anyone taking PEDs to compete with Savannah.
                You refused to go over rounds 2 and 6. You know you can't justify those rounds which is why you're trying to shut the discussion down. That tells me everything. Then there's round 8 to go over. You do it every time.

                How could those judges be crooked when they gave a fight to Shields even though she didn't win? You couldn't even give me a decent list of robberies to support your comments. Just like with everything else. I can with you lot though. That's the difference here. I live in reality and facts. You live in complete delusional fantasy. Oh, and have a fetish in humiliating yourself too.

                Comment

                • joseph5620
                  undisputed
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 15564
                  • 3,040
                  • 5,612
                  • 71,615

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Sid-Knee

                  Shields dominated in a fight which should have been a draw? That's impressive.
                  No, Shields dominated in reality. Your fictional nonsense means absolutely nothing.

                  Comment

                  • BlackRobb
                    Truth Teller
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2022
                    • 5078
                    • 1,721
                    • 1,850
                    • 0

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Sid-Knee

                    You refused to go over rounds 2 and 6. You know you can't justify those rounds which is why you're trying to shut the discussion down. That tells me everything. Then there's round 8 to go over. You do it every time.

                    How could those judges be crooked when they gave a fight to Shields even though she didn't win? You couldn't even give me a decent list of robberies to support your comments. Just like with everything else. I can with you lot though. That's the difference here. I live in reality and facts. You live in complete delusional fantasy. Oh, and have a fetish in humiliating yourself too.
                    I've watched the fight several times and even awarded an extra charity round to Marshall. She still lost. If she didn't feel she lost, why did she haul azz up to 168 to fight Crews-Duzern??? Your fighters are garbage. Stephen Edwards even said so today on his Mailbag.

                    Comment

                    • Sid-Knee
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2015
                      • 18249
                      • 1,091
                      • 731
                      • 155,532

                      #20
                      Originally posted by joseph5620

                      No, Shields dominated in reality. Your fictional nonsense means absolutely nothing.
                      Give me the rounds you think she won?

                      I had it a draw. Claiming she dominated is just the usual foolishness i expect from Americans. She did no such thing. But still, we can go over the rounds and break them down if you like. The other idiot keeps on running away. Hopefully you don't.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP