Comments Thread For: Savannah Marshall: Shields Needs Me, Won't Make as Much Money Fighting Anyone Else
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I already scored the fight. It was never a draw. My first card was 7-3 Shields and after watching it a second time, I was able to sc**** another round for Marshall. If Shields got a UD in the UK with those crooked judges, that means a clear win for Shields. Gabriels had to take PEDs to feel she had a chance against Shields. I don't see anyone taking PEDs to compete with Savannah.Comment
-
Comment
-
She got dominated no need for rematch move on savana you ain't good enough to beat shieldsFormer middleweight champion Savannah Marshall believes that a rematch with Claressa Shields will happen again. Last October, Marshall lost a ten round decision to Shields in their highly anticipated undisputed fight at 160-pounds.
[Click Here To Read More]Comment
-
You refused to go over rounds 2 and 6. You know you can't justify those rounds which is why you're trying to shut the discussion down. That tells me everything. Then there's round 8 to go over. You do it every time.
I already scored the fight. It was never a draw. My first card was 7-3 Shields and after watching it a second time, I was able to sc**** another round for Marshall. If Shields got a UD in the UK with those crooked judges, that means a clear win for Shields. Gabriels had to take PEDs to feel she had a chance against Shields. I don't see anyone taking PEDs to compete with Savannah.
How could those judges be crooked when they gave a fight to Shields even though she didn't win? You couldn't even give me a decent list of robberies to support your comments. Just like with everything else. I can with you lot though. That's the difference here. I live in reality and facts. You live in complete delusional fantasy. Oh, and have a fetish in humiliating yourself too.
Comment
-
Comment
-
I've watched the fight several times and even awarded an extra charity round to Marshall. She still lost. If she didn't feel she lost, why did she haul azz up to 168 to fight Crews-Duzern??? Your fighters are garbage. Stephen Edwards even said so today on his Mailbag.
You refused to go over rounds 2 and 6. You know you can't justify those rounds which is why you're trying to shut the discussion down. That tells me everything. Then there's round 8 to go over. You do it every time.
How could those judges be crooked when they gave a fight to Shields even though she didn't win? You couldn't even give me a decent list of robberies to support your comments. Just like with everything else. I can with you lot though. That's the difference here. I live in reality and facts. You live in complete delusional fantasy. Oh, and have a fetish in humiliating yourself too.Comment
-
Give me the rounds you think she won?
I had it a draw. Claiming she dominated is just the usual foolishness i expect from Americans. She did no such thing. But still, we can go over the rounds and break them down if you like. The other idiot keeps on running away. Hopefully you don't.Comment
Comment