Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bomac Backs Crawford For 'Top Five Pound For Pound Best Ever' If He Beats Spence, Charlo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by greeneye99 View Post

    My Post was to this guy Champion4ever that said previously said Bud would never fight Spence.....
    Soooo I'm confused....What dude?
    Care to explain?
    You're liking str8.2.da.point's posts when he's talking nothing but insanity.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

      You're liking str8.2.da.point's posts when he's talking nothing but insanity.
      I also liked Post by Hustle too
      But
      Again " that's your opinion"
      He made some and I agreed with his points concerning those Fights You called Robberies
      Hey just because you didn't agree with the judges or Refs's decisions don't mean they were wrong

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Str8.2.Da.Point View Post

        Oh, you are still here.....lol.

        I guess you think if you keep writing I'm going to read it.....lol....

        Nah..... I said on to the next conversation. Why are you still begging for my attention..... Your lie was point out. The logic went over your head. Comprehension wasn't your friend..... Move on little lady....... There will be more opportunities to redeem yourself......lol...
        What's wrong, why can't you name the other 4 fighters who are the greatest in history P4P alongside Crawford? Are you just going to hide until the coast is clear or something. Haha.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by greeneye99 View Post

          I also liked Post by Hustle too
          But
          Again " that's your opinion"
          He made some and I agreed with his points concerning those Fights You called Robberies
          Hey just because you didn't agree with the judges or Refs's decisions don't mean they were wrong
          The problem is, he's claiming because the judges came back with those cards, the decision stands like robberies don't exist or something. He said my opinion doesn't count, even though he said opinions should be respected. He contradicted himself. He even claimed because Bomac was involved in boxing, he is factual and not giving a deranged opinion like it should be taken as gospel or something. It's completely irrational. There's many people in boxing who are completely delusional. They're not gods.

          And that is just on that subject. The rest is insanity in which he can't justify. It's contradictory, hypocrisy, lacking in irony, projecting etc etc..

          Comment


          • If this type of hype talk is not coming from the people themselves, then it's just bro talk.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

              I've already pointed out your lack of comprehension and the fact you're delusional. You contradicted yourself repeatedly and put up nothing but fallacies and hypocrisy. Projecting to protect your ego isn't going to work. Most people on here already do that but i put them back in their box and have them deflecting like crazy. Hell, i don't even treat this freak show forum as a place you can have a logical discussion about boxing. I just clown all the weirdo's and extremists. You'll fit right in here.

              Did you not see my question on this very topic? Or do you want to deflect again? I said, alongside Crawford in the top 5 P4P, who are the other 4?

              "LOL".
              Oh, You're still here......lol.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

                What's wrong, why can't you name the other 4 fighters who are the greatest in history P4P alongside Crawford? Are you just going to hide until the coast is clear or something. Haha.
                You still crying for my attention?....lol

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
                  That would be some mean feat if Crawford achieved that but he won’t because my Boy Spence knocks him out in a gruelling punishing Fight that ends with Stevenson running into the ring to see if Crawford is ok after lying on the canvas motionless in the 11th round ,with fat bomac unable to climb through the ropes to attend to his fighter
                  The last sentence got me damn. Hahahahaha. Made me laugh out loud for real. Damn that was good.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Str8.2.Da.Point View Post

                    People like you are willing to claim Crawford hasn't proved himself in this division but unwilling to point out the obvious fact that he was being black balled the moment he got in the division.

                    Crawford on top of his world titles he's won during his career......he's also a 2x LINEAL CHAMPION. All these fake boxing fans don't know what that means apparently.

                    And my question is.....who in the division has "proved" themself to be the top guy?.....Spence?.....He continues to fight names who lost to other names on his way to create a legacy. Porter and Danny both failed to take the WBC title from Thurman.....but ended up fighting each other for that same title after Thurman was stripped of it for inactivity. Spence has openly said that he has zero interest in a fight vs Thurman for 4 years now......yet he was willing to fight 2 individuals who lost to him....then fought Ugas....an individual who lost to Porter and was GIVEN his title after Manny was stripped of it. I guess we can give Ugas props for beating that same 42 year old Manny after being out of the ring for 2 years due to his political duties.

                    At the end of the day.....regardless of everyone's emotions on Crawford or Spence.....what BoMac said is 100% true..... If Crawford who already has Undisputed on his resume, is able to get passed Spence to become Undisputed in a 2nd division, then follows that up with beating Charlo to become Undisputed in a 3rd division......Top 5 p4p all time.....there isn't an argument to leave him out........Again.....he would have to get that done though.
                    HAHAHAHA WHAT?!!! this is one of the worst posts I have ever seen!! First of all yes Spence is the man at 147 and he has been. Thurman ducked him, and then sat out. Gave up his WBC. Then lost the WBA which Spence collected.

                    But more importantly, you said if Crawford beats Spence and Charlo he is top 5 P4P all time?!! Hahahaha oh my goodness you're either Bomac or one of the most delusional posters I have ever seen. And to say there wouldn't be an argument to leave him out?!!!

                    That is LAUGHABLE. SHAAAAAMMMMME.
                    Last edited by FaustoGeraci; 05-20-2023, 08:02 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

                      The problem is, he's claiming because the judges came back with those cards, the decision stands like robberies don't exist or something. He said my opinion doesn't count, even though he said opinions should be respected. He contradicted himself. He even claimed because Bomac was involved in boxing, he is factual and not giving a deranged opinion like it should be taken as gospel or something. It's completely irrational. There's many people in boxing who are completely delusional. They're not gods.

                      And that is just on that subject. The rest is insanity in which he can't justify. It's contradictory, hypocrisy, lacking in irony, projecting etc etc..
                      I cannot believe that guy agreed with Bomac's asinine take on Crawford being top 5 ever with those 2 hypothetical wins. I feel embarassed for him. Hahahahaha this forum is getting worse and worse

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP