Comments Thread For: Bomac Backs Crawford For 'Top Five Pound For Pound Best Ever' If He Beats Spence, Charlo

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

You believe there can't be any robberies? That it's a fact every time they come back with their cards? It isn't their opinion? Lewis/Holyfield was in fact a draw, not a grotesque robbery?

I don't go around accepting robberies. That would be a very strange thing to do. Not even you would accept it if Crawford clearly won a fight only to be ripped off. Then you'd be showing hypocrisy. But i expect that from someone who has written the laughable stench you've written here. But thanks for doing so. I just needed someone to show this level of insanity and see if they felt like an imbecile whilst doing so or not.

You believe i wrote an opinion on Spence and Thurman not fighting? Where did this happen?

I never once said they were top 5. I just listed fighters vastly superior to Crawford and wanted to see who you would put him over. Again, you've seen something that doesn't exist. But it's not surprising considering the fantasy world you inhabit. But to do so over 4 of the 5 is a thing of beauty to witness.

Yes, silly me, what did Lewis, Duran, Leonard and Hopkins do to be greater than a fighter who would have wins over Postal, Spence, Porter and Charlo. 4 killer names so great that the mass of great wins between these fighters would pale into insignificance.

You read my post and came to the conclusion that i only watch highlights? Could you be specific on what part had you delude yourself with this ignorant and laughable insanity, please?

If you're going to moralize, don't you think it's best to take your own advice and not tell me to "Cut the bullshlt"? or "Get out of my emotions"? Maybe telling me i come across as someone who "Watches highlights" and not full fights even though i have a vast collection of fights in my library from throughout history, wouldn't to you, be insulting? Maybe saying to someone that a fat idiot like Bomac is the all knowing about boxing and couldn't possibly come out with insanity so don't ever doubt him. He knows more than you. If he speaks, you listen. How about, no. How about i laugh at the pair of you for being this utterly f3cking deranged to ever come out with the shlt you two are speaking.

As for arguing about who is greater between the likes of Lewis, Duran and Crawford. I couldn't possibly do so. It's a topic that would be laughed at in reality. Only those detached from it would have such a ridiculous discussion about it. It's f3cking preposterous in it's most extreme. Therefore, i can't have this discussion with you. Sorry. I exist in reality, not the world you and the likes of Bomac are from.

Your comprehension is horrible. I never said there can't be robberies.... But your silly notion that Porter was robbed vs Thurman and Spence is a CLEAR opinion that doesn't matter in this argument... Because most agreed with the results and it's documented.... So trying to use YOUR OPINION to push you rebuttal is falling on death ears.

The argument is IF Crawford accomplishes the feat of a 3 division undisputed champ then he is top 5.... so if you aren't suggesting the names you pulled are top 5.....THE WHY TF DID YOU BRING THEM UP..... The **** is wrong with you. Are you not able to stay on subject in this dicussion.

You sound dumb as **** trying to push this weird as narrative then claiming it's REALITY..... You clearly are too emotional and you are getting emotional because I pointed that out. You are willing to call BoMac a "fat idiot" but then want to address me calling you emotional..... FOH......

No you can't hold this conversation with me, because I want to discuss the sport and things that actually happened. You want to bring in your opinions on how things should have been and what could be if something else happened.........3 division undisputed makes you ELITE in history....regardless of your fragile feelings towards the fighter...PERIOD......

[Sid-Knee]

Your comprehension is horrible. I never said there can't be robberies.... But your silly notion that Porter was robbed vs Thurman and Spence is a CLEAR opinion that doesn't matter in this argument... Because most agreed with the results and it's documented.... So trying to use YOUR OPINION to push you rebuttal is falling on death ears.

The argument is IF Crawford accomplishes the feat of a 3 division undisputed champ then he is top 5.... so if you aren't suggesting the names you pulled are top 5.....THE WHY TF DID YOU BRING THEM UP..... The **** is wrong with you. Are you not able to stay on subject in this dicussion.

You sound dumb as **** trying to push this weird as narrative then claiming it's REALITY..... You clearly are too emotional and you are getting emotional because I pointed that out. You are willing to call BoMac a "fat idiot" but then want to address me calling you emotional..... FOH......

No you can't hold this conversation with me, because I want to discuss the sport and things that actually happened. You want to bring in your opinions on how things should have been and what could be if something else happened.........3 division undisputed makes you ELITE in history....regardless of your fragile feelings towards the fighter...PERIOD......

You said they were documented. I pointed out that all robberies in history are documented too. It doesn't make them legit though. But you're questioning my comprehension?

If you know how to score a fight properly, it's best to not do it on opinion but on the criteria in which a fight is scored.

I clearly told you i didn't think they were top 5 in history. I said they were top fighters from recent era's. The point was, if Crawford can't be anywhere near to reaching the levels of the 5 fighters i listed, then he sure as hell isn't going to reach the level of the actual fighters who should be in the top 5 in history. But it was lost on you. I reiterated the point, but it's still lost on you. What was it you said about comprehension again?

What's also lost on you is irony. Go back and read what you said about insulting people. Forgot that too already? You call people "Weird" and "Fake" without any hint of irony. You then get all emotional with the insults with me in one big irrational f3ckfest of delusion where it's all lost on you in this area too. Then re-read your comment that people's opinion's don't matter but the words of an idiot like Bomac do. Then read another part of your comment where you say you shouldn't belittle people's opinions because you don't agree with them. Then go back to the comprehension comment and realise the level of madness i'm dealing with here. That's without you explaining to me where in my comment i said anything about Spence and Thurman not fighting like you claimed i did.

You think acknowledging Bomac being an idiot with a bias is me being emotional? You're all over the place. If you can justify your position, then it's all good. But if you can't, like you, then no, you can't justify calling someone emotional. You're too ****** to even understand that you're being too emotional for having a different opinion by your logic. Difference is, i make sense. You don't.

Wait, you think Bomac and you are talking about facts and not deranged opinions that the vast majority of people would laugh at? Damn, you really are even more detached from reality than i first thought.

Yeah, it is almost impossible to have a rational discussion when one person is intelligent and rational with the other detached from reality and all over the place without realising it. They don't realise it because they're backwards. Backwards people also come up with ridiculous opinions that the likes of Terrence Crawford would be top 5 in history if he were to be a 3 weight undisputed champion with the only wins over world class opposition being Charlo, Postal, Spence and Porter. A resume in the great scheme of things historically, as not being worthy to even p1ss on.

However, for the shlts and giggles, could you please tell me who the other 4 would be in your opinion alongside Crawford P4P in history? You make out you know who they are and who they aren't. So, please, just for the laughs, tell me who they are.

P.S Has Greeneye lost the plot or something? Has he been possessed? It sure looks like it to me. F3ck me.

[Boxfan83]

He beats Spence and Charlo hes top 5 and Better than Floyd.

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

You said they were documented. I pointed out that all robberies in history are documented too. It doesn't make them legit though. But you're questioning my comprehension?

If you know how to score a fight properly, it's best to not do it on opinion but on the criteria in which a fight is scored.

I clearly told you i didn't think they were top 5 in history. I said they were top fighters from recent era's. The point was, if Crawford can't be anywhere near to reaching the levels of the 5 fighters i listed, then he sure as hell isn't going to reach the level of the actual fighters who should be in the top 5 in history. But it was lost on you. I reiterated the point, but it's still lost on you. What was it you said about comprehension again?

What's also lost on you is irony. Go back and read what you said about insulting people. Forgot that too already? You call people "Weird" and "Fake" without any hint of irony. You then get all emotional with the insults with me in one big irrational f3ckfest of delusion where it's all lost on you in this area too. Then re-read your comment that people's opinion's don't matter but the words of an idiot like Bomac do. Then read another part of your comment where you say you shouldn't belittle people's opinions because you don't agree with them. Then go back to the comprehension comment and realise the level of madness i'm dealing with here. That's without you explaining to me where in my comment i said anything about Spence and Thurman not fighting like you claimed i did.

You think acknowledging Bomac being an idiot with a bias is me being emotional? You're all over the place. If you can justify your position, then it's all good. But if you can't, like you, then no, you can't justify calling someone emotional. You're too ****** to even understand that you're being too emotional for having a different opinion by your logic. Difference is, i make sense. You don't.

Wait, you think Bomac and you are talking about facts and not deranged opinions that the vast majority of people would laugh at? Damn, you really are even more detached from reality than i first thought.

Yeah, it is almost impossible to have a rational discussion when one person is intelligent and rational with the other detached from reality and all over the place without realising it. They don't realise it because they're backwards. Backwards people also come up with ridiculous opinions that the likes of Terrence Crawford would be top 5 in history if he were to be a 3 weight undisputed champion with the only wins over world class opposition being Charlo, Postal, Spence and Porter. A resume in the great scheme of things historically, as not being worthy to even p1ss on.

However, for the shlts and giggles, could you please tell me who the other 4 would be in your opinion alongside Crawford P4P in history? You make out you know who they are and who they aren't. So, please, just for the laughs, tell me who they are.

P.S Has Greeneye lost the plot or something? Has he been possessed? It sure looks like it to me. F3ck me.

Well, you are lying.... All robberies are not documented. YOU simply want to talk about it. Robberies are OPINIONS based on who you are cheering for. How are they all documented. Please, give me a link that shows that the Manny vs Bradley robbery (my opinion) is documented. Please point to where Fury vs Wilder 1 is documented as a robbery (again my opinion). What about Canelo vs GGG 1 (also.....my opinion).

I'm done with this back and forth. You are obviously one of these silly posters who simply want to "win an argument" vs strangers rather than have a discussion of opinions on boxing. Your logic is lost in space when trying to rebuttal me. I'm talking about a specific issue, you randomly respond with something that has nothing to do with what I'm saying then try to talk circles around yourself to justify the silly **** you posted.

I'm not going to read the rest of your passage because it seems like a wast of time trying to exchange with you. Enjoy your day. On to the next conversation.

[Sid-Knee]

Well, you are lying.... All robberies are not documented. YOU simply want to talk about it. Robberies are OPINIONS based on who you are cheering for. How are they all documented. Please, give me a link that shows that the Manny vs Bradley robbery (my opinion) is documented. Please point to where Fury vs Wilder 1 is documented as a robbery (again my opinion). What about Canelo vs GGG 1 (also.....my opinion).

I'm done with this back and forth. You are obviously one of these silly posters who simply want to "win an argument" vs strangers rather than have a discussion of opinions on boxing. Your logic is lost in space when trying to rebuttal me. I'm talking about a specific issue, you randomly respond with something that has nothing to do with what I'm saying then try to talk circles around yourself to justify the silly **** you posted.

I'm not going to read the rest of your passage because it seems like a wast of time trying to exchange with you. Enjoy your day. On to the next conversation.

Man, you have serious issues. I said every fight that is a robbery is documented as well. Meaning that you don't take the result the judges put forward as a given. Even the worse robberies. They aren't the oracle where everything they put down is fact. It's then up to us to see where the robberies are and point them out. If not, that would mean there has never been a robbery in history.

People who have their insanity pointed out are usually "Done". Maybe don't go around posting madness then.

My logic is lost in space? Hahaha. Yeah. Of course it is. What was it you said about wanting to "Win an argument"? I do so with facts and reality. You attempt to with delusion and then run off pretending you didn't just have it all pointed out to you. Every point was brought up by you. I addressed the points. You're now pretending otherwise because i hurt your ego and laughed at your madness.

You don't want to continue with the topic and tell me who the other 4 fighters are that would make the top 5 best P4P in history alongside Crawford? You'll make me think you're just talking more shlt and have no idea what you're saying so therefore couldn't even in your wildest dreams present 4 other fighters in history. Sorry, but that's exactly what it is. You just can't bare for me to laugh at the 4 names you put forward because you're absolutely clueless. This whole thread makes that very clear.

[Sid-Knee]

Wait a minute.............
You got like 10 previous Post saying Terrence Crawford would Never fight Errol Spence
Your post are like a Movie
Lolololol

The curiosity has got the better of me... Has that dude bought you off the internet and is making you do things against your will or something? Because, that dude is crazy. Agreeing with him makes no sense to me. Care to explain?

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

Man, you have serious issues. I said every fight that is a robbery is documented as well. Meaning that you don't take the result the judges put forward as a given. Even the worse robberies. They aren't the oracle where everything they put down is fact. It's then up to us to see where the robberies are and point them out. If not, that would mean there has never been a robbery in history.

People who have their insanity pointed out are usually "Done". Maybe don't go around posting madness then.

My logic is lost in space? Hahaha. Yeah. Of course it is. What was it you said about wanting to "Win an argument"? I do so with facts and reality. You attempt to with delusion and then run off pretending you didn't just have it all pointed out to you. Every point was brought up by you. I addressed the points. You're now pretending otherwise because i hurt your ego and laughed at your madness.

You don't want to continue with the topic and tell me who the other 4 fighters are that would make the top 5 best P4P in history alongside Crawford? You'll make me think you're just talking more shlt and have no idea what you're saying so therefore couldn't even in your wildest dreams present 4 other fighters in history. Sorry, but that's exactly what it is. You just can't bare for me to laugh at the 4 names you put forward because you're absolutely clueless. This whole thread makes that very clear.

Oh, you are still here.....lol.

I guess you think if you keep writing I'm going to read it.....lol....

Nah..... I said on to the next conversation. Why are you still begging for my attention..... Your lie was point out. The logic went over your head. Comprehension wasn't your friend..... Move on little lady....... There will be more opportunities to redeem yourself......lol...

[hugh grant]

If bud beats spence, he's top 4 pfp today. Best charlo he's no1 pro above usy k and Inouye

[greeneye99]

The curiosity has got the better of me... Has that dude bought you off the internet and is making you do things against your will or something? Because, that dude is crazy. Agreeing with him makes no sense to me. Care to explain?

My Post was to this guy Champion4ever that said previously said Bud would never fight Spence.....
Soooo I'm confused....What dude?
Care to explain?

[Sid-Knee]

Oh, you are still here.....lol.

I guess you think if you keep writing I'm going to read it.....lol....

Nah..... I said on to the next conversation. Why are you still begging for my attention..... Your lie was point out. The logic went over your head. Comprehension wasn't your friend..... Move on little lady....... There will be more opportunities to redeem yourself......lol...

I've already pointed out your lack of comprehension and the fact you're delusional. You contradicted yourself repeatedly and put up nothing but fallacies and hypocrisy. Projecting to protect your ego isn't going to work. Most people on here already do that but i put them back in their box and have them deflecting like crazy. Hell, i don't even treat this freak show forum as a place you can have a logical discussion about boxing. I just clown all the weirdo's and extremists. You'll fit right in here.

Did you not see my question on this very topic? Or do you want to deflect again? I said, alongside Crawford in the top 5 P4P, who are the other 4?

"LOL".