Fury truly broke my heart

[Kzbox]

But it was Fury who asked for the rematch clause in the first place.

Alex Krassyuk said that Usyk broke up his training camp and went home because he realised that he was wasting his time and money training for a fight that wasn't going to happen. Sugar Hill gave the game away by telling a reporter that he was in the UK for Okolie's fight, not to train Fury. I don't know what kind of bi-polar shit was going on in Fury's head, but it's obvious that he never intended to fight Usyk.

Okay if he did ask for the rematch first thats cool and i have the same energy for that as i do for Usyk.

When Usyk asked for a ridiculous split he just said take it off the table in the end it was Usyk who was rematch clause or bust at the end of negotiations then walked away.

[Smash]

Okay if he did ask for the rematch first thats cool and i have the same energy for that as i do for Usyk.

.

I look forward to reading this

[YoungManRumble]

Lol pathetic faggot. You can still gargle Canelo's balls though so take solace in that.

[kafkod]

Okay if he did ask for the rematch first thats cool and i have the same energy for that as i do for Usyk.

When Usyk asked for a ridiculous split he just said take it off the table in the end it was Usyk who was rematch clause or bust at the end of negotiations then walked away.

Why is 70/30 to the winner in a rematch a ridiculous split? If Fury was confident of winning why would that be a problem to him?

The original deal was 50/50. Fury agreed to that and everybody seemed to believe that it was a fair split, including both of Fury's promoters.

Now, suddenly, 50/50 for Usyk in a rematch if he wins the first fight is ridiculous?

If Usyk deserved 50/50 because he had 3 world title belts, why would he not deserve 50/50 if he held all 4 belts plus the imaginary lineal title, and Fury had no titles at all?

Please explain this, because I am truly baffled by it.

[Kzbox]

Why is 70/30 to the winner in a rematch a ridiculous split? If Fury was confident of winning why would that be a problem to him?

The original deal was 50/50. Fury agreed to that and everybody seemed to believe that it was a fair split, including both of Fury's promoters.

Now, suddenly, 50/50 for Usyk in a rematch if he wins the first fight is ridiculous?

If Usyk deserved 50/50 because he had 3 world title belts, why would he not deserve 50/50 if he held all 4 belts plus the imaginary lineal title, and Fury had no titles at all?

Please explain this, because I am truly baffled by it.

He does deserve 50 - 50 in the rematch should he win he just doesn’t deserve 70% even 60% would be okay but Usyk didn’t even counter offer said 70% in the rematch or nothing thats on him.

[Toffee]

He does deserve 50 - 50 in the rematch should he win he just doesn’t deserve 70% even 60% would be okay but Usyk didn’t even counter offer said 70% in the rematch or nothing thats on him.

The teams spoke for a long, long time. All those conference calls they all talk about.

You don't think there was ever mention of splits?

I think it's pretty clear that Usyk was arguing up, Fury was arguing down. Otherwise we wouldn't have arrived at the reported deal that was on offer.

If the highest Fury would go was genuinely 70/30, then 70/30 rematch if Fury won and 50/50 if Usyk won then that's a terrible best offer.

You guys are playing Warren's game. Usyk accepting 70/30 for the first fight doesn't suddenly make that a good offer. It's only a decent offer if the rematch split is worthwhile. Even Fury goaded Usyk's team for accepting 70/30.

[QueensburyRules]

- - Give it up. Everyone knows Blubber bricked it, and it ain't the first time he filled his shorts.

[kafkod]

The teams spoke for a long, long time. All those conference calls they all talk about.

You don't think there was ever mention of splits?

I think it's pretty clear that Usyk was arguing up, Fury was arguing down. Otherwise we wouldn't have arrived at the reported deal that was on offer.

If the highest Fury would go was genuinely 70/30, then 70/30 rematch if Fury won and 50/50 if Usyk won then that's a terrible best offer.

You guys are playing Warren's game. Usyk accepting 70/30 for the first fight doesn't suddenly make that a good offer. It's only a decent offer if the rematch split is worthwhile. Even Fury goaded Usyk's team for accepting 70/30.

This is true. As soon as Usyk accepted 70/30, Fury popped up on Instagram telling Krassyuk he was the worst manager in history for letting Usyk accept 30%. So he obviously knew that Usyk was worth more than that. But next thing, Warren is telling everybody that if Usyk is only worth 30% in the first fight, then he can't be worth 70% in a rematch, even if he wins the first fight. And some gullible fans just swallow this bullshit without question.

[Kzbox]

This is true. As soon as Usyk accepted 70/30, Fury popped up on Instagram telling Krassyuk he was the worst manager in history for letting Usyk accept 30%. So he obviously knew that Usyk was worth more than that. But next thing, Warren is telling everybody that if Usyk is only worth 30% in the first fight, then he can't be worth 70% in a rematch, even if he wins the first fight. And some gullible fans just swallow this bullshit without question.

You say gullible i say facts we will soon see anyway lets see how many PPVs Usyk vs Dubois does i will be more than happy to admit I’m wrong if he does decent numbers. Yeah Usyk beat AJ and respect to him for that but nobody really cared too much about him at cruiserweight.

[kafkod]

You say gullible i say facts we will soon see anyway lets see how many PPVs Usyk vs Dubois does i will be more than happy to admit I’m wrong if he does decent numbers. Yeah Usyk beat AJ and respect to him for that but nobody really cared too much about him at cruiserweight.

Do you think anybody would pay to see Fury vs Dubois on PPV now? Fury has done himself tremendous damage in the last few weeks. If you tried thinking for yourself instead of just parroting his bullshit you would understand that.