Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wladimir Klitschko Protests Inclusion of Russian Athletes at 2024 Olympics

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Boro View Post

    I didn't avoid saying anything concrete you imbecile, I've said the same thing 1000x times over in several different ways you inability to grasp things isn't on me, I've been consistent throughout.

    I literally said throughout multiple times, Russia had said America and it's allies repeatedly trying to get surrounding countries particularly Ukraine to join the EU was a huge issue for them and has for been decades.

    It's not like they'd just had Estonia,Latvia,Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania etc etc join the year before the Annex of Crimea or anything /sarcasm.

    Leaving Belarus,Moldova and Ukrainine as the "last" countries stopping them from being utterly surrounded by America and it's allies and it's not like America isn't renowned for setup army bases in every country it has reach or anything...

    I shown condelezza saying live on news as good as they intend to attack Russia Via minerals and Oil and EU will suffer and surprise surprise that's exactly what is happening and then sleepy joe saying they take out nord ****** 2 live on news again and then it happens.

    And they claim it Russia but Russia's entire economy relies on said oil and gas and 62% is sold to the EU after their own little "explorative" dives with Denmark and Norway just a month or so before hand exposed by exposed by Seymour Hersh who is a well respected Pulitzer Prize winning journalist.

    Then you've got Blackrock, JP Morgan. Gold Sachs, IMF, WEF and all them saying how they'll affect governance and so on the links I provide with the UK about how they'll setup partnerships in taking and sharing citizens information with big corporations, how the UK has been actively helping them take away privacy and workers right more so then they already have with their ****** E-Governance app and so on LIKE I'VE SAID NUMEROUS TIMES I'M BORED OF REITERATING THE POINT BECAUSE YOU FAIL TO GRASP SIMPLE CONCEPTS.

    All you've done through is pathetically attempt to insult and claim i'm tinfoil, you've literally done nothing else, I on the other hand have provided video, quotes, government sites so on and so forth.

    As for your *******ual tendencies don't put them on to me and living in mommy's basement don't put your alternative lifestyle on me either and just because you swing both ways and find it acceptable doesn't mean I do, you little freak.

    And how didn't I provide proof ***** was a pawn, America and it's allies knew he's a hot head and he'd react accordingly to their provocations and effective ousting of the government in the Ukraine at the time thereby effectively being a marionette playing to their beat... are you really that ******.
    No I'm not. For your information, it's you who is ******. Why?

    You look at a very small sample of circumstantial evidence and draw laughably idiotic conclusions from that.

    I already explained this to you but you were too busy drooling over pictures of ***** to pay attention I guess.

    Each and every example you gave have a more common sense explanation.

    The reason the countries near Russia want to join Nato is Russia. Russia is an unreliable totalitarian country with a militaristic culture that has been rewriting history for decades now to suit this idea of Russia as a great power and being in the right. They are building a narrative that the Western values are evil and Russia is the only thing standing in the way of collapse of family and freedom. This is propaganda aimed to justify war as we now see. At least everyone with a brain sees. Ukraine wanted to join Nato not to provoke Russia but because they were scared of the Russian invasion. You would feel less safe even with your mom around if you lived next to the Russian border.

    So this is why the countries feel the best way to defend their country is joining NATO as they cannot rely on anyone else and alone their military is not comparable to Russia.

    EU is not a military union so it poses literally no threat to Russia. EU has in fact been foolishly friendly toward Russia considering the constantly hostile rhetoric from *****.

    Condoleezza was right in hindsight and US has great intelligence on Russian plans as shown when they told the world beforehand to the minute when Russia was going to attack. US has been aware and warning EU about the Russian threat. The fact that Condoleezza was aware that Russia cannot be trusted is again not proof of anything besides that she was aware of the threat. That's it.

    Nord ****** 2 was a way to try keep EU dependent on Russian gas while Russia keeps pushing their aggressive policies little by little. It never should have been built. The corrupt parties involved in pushing for the deal in Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Estonia and Finland should be jailed for treason.

    The point about Blackrock etc. is just a basic set of countries and companies doing their thing. Everyone is offering help to Ukraine and this is not proof of anything else. Why do you think UK wants to take away Ukrainian rights? Can you really not hear the Russian propaganda in your own words? If not then you're just hopelessly delusional.

    You're the one fanboying over Putler. Not me. You are the one who for some reason is refusing to see anything besides the Russian troll point of view and for what reason? You haven't explained. So the simples explanation is that you really like *****. Plus your over acted ****phobia is typical for people who are insecure about their own ***uality.

    So the president of Russia is a pawn because American tease him. Lmao. This is honestly the weakest distraction I have ever seen and obviously you don't believe that even yourself.

    Russia is the criminal here. Not WEF, EU, NATO, Blackrock, the globalists, NWO, Illuminati, Free Masons, Aliens or Lizards anymore than the Easter Bunny or Uncle Scrooge. We can see that Russia is killing and destroying Ukraine and yet you're here making excuses and blaming others. If this were a trial your case is like "sure we have confirmed legit video evidence of Vladimir murdering Tanya but hey this businessman Joe was in the area as well and he has a lot of money so he could have paid people to brainwash Vladimir so he kills Tanya so that Vladimir's workmates can be put on surveillance by his tech company so ya'll are ****** if you don't see that Joe is the guilty here!"

    Your entire position is the textbook example of the Way Of The Tinfoil: assume your conspiracy narrative is true and find whatever evidence that supports it and fill in the gaps. This is literally you.

    image.png

    Now keep going if you want but the more you try to bring to the table the less good it looks for you. Or just do as you tinfoils do and throw some insults and flee. Either way is fine with me and it proves my point all the same.
    Century Tuna Century Tuna likes this.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by letsgochump View Post

      EU is not a military union so it poses literally no threat to Russia. EU has in fact been foolishly friendly toward Russia considering the constantly hostile rhetoric from *****.

      .
      Boring, Of course EU is a military union you clown, they're one of the ones training Ukraine at this very minute Via the CSDP...

      Condelezza didn't mention anything about an attack in the video i was referencing/linked, she was talking about "it's time we make EU dependent on Americas bounty and weaken Russia" and at the same time as this is happening Nuland and McCain are actively provoking the revolution of dignity stop acting like these are just mere coincidences.

      You're literally doing what you've consistently doing and that's take things out of context or adding your own spin to it...

      And where did i imply Ukraine was trying to "provoke" Russia?! NATO and EU used Ukraine to achieve their ends and were the ones doing the aforementioned provoking not Ukraine though I suppose they did in a way by proxy...

      You literally conceded about Blackrock and their want to effect the governance of Ukraine and now you're backtracking... No one here has ever mention "globalist" apart from YOU.

      I didn't say UK wants to take away Ukrainian rights though they do I said they're helping them (Ukraine) take away workers rights and privacies more so then they already have with their little app - Дія

      And the benefits are it's easier for larger corporations particularly tech corporations to avoid unionisation and other issues particularly those from the UK and the two governments (UK - Ukrainian) outlined a deal and I linked it to you... and it's several permutations can be found in that very government link...

      And I haven't made one homóphobic statement either , that's an outrageous thing to accuse me of.

      All I've said is don't put your alternative lifestyle on me if that's homóphobic then sure i'm homóphobic... I couldn't careless if that's the new definition than sure label me that.
      Last edited by Boro; 02-27-2023, 04:12 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Boro View Post

        Boring, Of course EU is a military union you clown, they're one of the ones training Ukraine at this very minute Via the CSDP...

        Condelezza didn't mention anything about an attack in the video i was referencing/linked, she was talking about "it's time we make EU dependent on Americas bounty and weaken Russia" and at the same time as this is happening Nuland and McCain are actively provoking the revolution of dignity stop acting like these are just mere coincidences.

        You're literally doing what you've consistently doing and that's take things out of context or adding your own spin to it...

        And where did i imply Ukraine was trying to "provoke" Russia?! NATO and EU used Ukraine to achieve their ends and were the ones doing the aforementioned provoking not Ukraine though I suppose they did in a way by proxy...

        You literally conceded about Blackrock and their want to effect the governance of Ukraine and now you're backtracking... No one here has ever mention "globalist" apart from YOU.

        I didn't say UK wants to take away Ukrainian rights though they do I said they're helping them (Ukraine) take away workers rights and privacies more so then they already have with their little app - Дія

        And the benefits are it's easier for larger corporations particularly tech corporations to avoid unionisation and other issues particularly those from the UK and the two governments (UK - Ukrainian) outlined a deal and I linked it to you... and it's several permutations can be found in that very government link...

        And I haven't made one homóphobic statement either , that's an outrageous thing to accuse me of.

        All I've said is don't put your alternative lifestyle on me if that's homóphobic then sure i'm homóphobic... I couldn't careless if that's the new definition than sure label me that.
        Nopertron. EU CSDP is a formality and that's why EU countries are joining NATO. Since it's beginning it's been built around NATO. To this day there is nothing that would force the EU countries to come to each other's aid. Going forward there might be a bit more of a development toward actual military alliance but the reason Finland and Sweden are now applying for NATO membership is precisely because EU is not a reliable alliance militarily.

        Militarily EU has never posed any threat to Russia, as I said. To say the opposite is fairy tales. Which you believe in ofc so I guess that doesn't mean much to you.

        I'm not adding any spin to anything. I'm taking things as they are, not drawing conclusions from individual speeches or statements. You're the one doing the spins.

        I never conceded anything else besides companies are doing what they always do. Again this is not evidence of a plan to take over Ukraine.

        I know you never said that but all you're implying is that there is some policy by let's see WEF, EU, NATO, US, Blackrock, Goldman and "larger corporations" among others and this war in Ukraine was their plan in order to get digital courts and social credit scores and avoid unions. So let's hear it directly, do you believe in the globalists? That there is a global elite that is trying to manipulate world politics to gain power over people?

        HHAHAHA right. "I never said x was doing y, I said x was helping to do y." Google nitpicking.


        You called it sick when I said people are doing gay for pay like you wanna do with *****. That's ****phobic. Plus you seem to think being gay is an insult.




        Comment


        • Originally posted by letsgochump View Post

          Nopertron. EU CSDP is a formality and that's why EU countries are joining NATO. Since it's beginning it's been built around NATO. To this day there is nothing that would force the EU countries to come to each other's aid. Going forward there might be a bit more of a development toward actual military alliance but the reason Finland and Sweden are now applying for NATO membership is precisely because EU is not a reliable alliance militarily.

          Militarily EU has never posed any threat to Russia, as I said. To say the opposite is fairy tales. Which you believe in ofc so I guess that doesn't mean much to you.

          I'm not adding any spin to anything. I'm taking things as they are, not drawing conclusions from individual speeches or statements. You're the one doing the spins.

          I never conceded anything else besides companies are doing what they always do. Again this is not evidence of a plan to take over Ukraine.

          I know you never said that but all you're implying is that there is some policy by let's see WEF, EU, NATO, US, Blackrock, Goldman and "larger corporations" among others and this war in Ukraine was their plan in order to get digital courts and social credit scores and avoid unions. So let's hear it directly, do you believe in the globalists? That there is a global elite that is trying to manipulate world politics to gain power over people?

          HHAHAHA right. "I never said x was doing y, I said x was helping to do y." Google nitpicking.


          You called it sick when I said people are doing gay for pay like you wanna do with *****. That's ****phobic. Plus you seem to think being gay is an insult.



          If you want to claim it's formality when they're actively training other militaries then you do that but as proven by this whole conversation your opinion is beyond irrelevant because your unwilling to accept reality of situations unless it conforms to your warped world view.

          I'm taking the speeches and quotes and government documents and so on at face value not putting "spins" on them, i'm just putting them in the ether and and discussing them.

          You're the one who's actively been trying to spin what's being said e.g. your "Condezzela great american intelligence and to the minute Russian attack BS"

          Yes you did, literally you said don't agree with blackrock effecting governance, "Source for this? And no I don't and that's why I never said that. I believe in democracy and that's why Russia is a dungole country. Yet here you are, questioning the ethics of the private sector supporting a country in war while defending a dictatorship."

          It's beyond hilarious how in this very sentence your responding in a way that you're against blackrock wanting to effect Ukrainians governance and at the same time asking me why i'm questioning the ethics of the private sector it makes me wonder if you think before you type...

          And in my next response to you I prove it's blackrock who said the aforementioned and it's the top result in google, you conveniently don't address the point, you actually only address 1/7... which seems to be a habit of yours as I've pointed out umpteen times.

          I've told you this before I couldn't careless about a globalist agenda or not, I care about people knowing all the "AVAILABLE" information and not just the orchestrated MSM version of events...

          A globalist agenda is beneficial to me I regularly move around the world for work so the easier that is the better.

          But for the average Joe who's earning pennies and has to actually worry about their income and if they're protected properly under law.

          It's imperative they've got a better understanding of their rights and aren't distracted by shít in the MSM whilst getting slowly stripped of rights unbeknownst to them...

          Where did I say it was "sick" when people do gay for pay? you won't find that anywhere up until this point now - it is... I don't want to do anything with ***** you weirdo, stop putting your homó******, basement dwelling lifestyle on me...

          And of course gay is an insult, homó***uality is an aberration, therefore the implication is you're not normal... thereby abnormal, hence an insult it don't take a genius to work out.
          Last edited by Boro; 02-28-2023, 04:18 AM.
          ShoulderRoll ShoulderRoll likes this.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Boro View Post

            If you want to claim it's formality when they're actively training other militaries then you do that but as proven by this whole conversation your opinion is beyond irrelevant because your unwilling to accept reality of situations unless it conforms to your warped world view.

            I'm taking the speeches and quotes and government documents and so on at face value not putting "spins" on them, i'm just putting them in the ether and and discussing them.

            You're the one who's actively been trying to spin what's being said e.g. your "Condezzela great american intelligence and to the minute Russian attack BS"

            Yes you did, literally you said don't agree with blackrock effecting governance, "Source for this? And no I don't and that's why I never said that. I believe in democracy and that's why Russia is a dungole country. Yet here you are, questioning the ethics of the private sector supporting a country in war while defending a dictatorship."

            It's beyond hilarious how in this very sentence your responding in a way that you're against blackrock wanting to effect Ukrainians governance and at the same time asking me why i'm questioning the ethics of the private sector it makes me wonder if you think before you type...

            And in my next response to you I prove it's blackrock who said the aforementioned and it's the top result in google, you conveniently don't address the point, you actually only address 1/7... which seems to be a habit of yours as I've pointed out umpteen times.

            I've told you this before I couldn't careless about a globalist agenda or not, I care about people knowing all the "AVAILABLE" information and not just the orchestrated MSM version of events...

            A globalist agenda is beneficial to me I regularly move around the world for work so the easier that is the better.

            But for the average Joe who's earning pennies and has to actually worry about their income and if they're protected properly under law.

            It's imperative they've got a better understanding of their rights and aren't distracted by shít in the MSM whilst getting slowly stripped of rights unbeknownst to them...

            Where did I say it was "sick" when people do gay for pay? you won't find that anywhere up until this point now - it is... I don't want to do anything with ***** you weirdo, stop putting your homó******, basement dwelling lifestyle on me...

            And of course gay is an insult, homó***uality is an aberration, therefore the implication is you're not normal... thereby abnormal, hence an insult it don't take a genius to work out.
            No its really not about world view. EU troops have ever done operations that my dad's volley ball team could have accomplished. NATO is the military alliance here. Anyway, are you saying that Russia should be afraid of the EU militarily?

            It's not a spin to Condoleezza and many other US politicians knew Russia was a pos kleptocracy. They've been saying it as long as I can remember.

            The bulk of your text is just repeating how bad my reading comprehension is but even when you're going back and rereading my comment you still misunderstand. I was answering to this "if you think private corporations should be actively controlling the governance of the Ukraine or any country for that matter then okay". Meaning I don't think private corporations should be controlling the governance of Ukraine. I never said I agree that this is what Blackrock is doing. Do you think before you type? Or after?

            I did address this point. The statement means nothing.

            You dodged again. Do you believe in the globalist agenda for world power or not?

            Who is reliable source is not Main****** Media?

            I said that it was normal for people to do ***ual services for gain is ***ually frustrated places like prisons etc. You responded to that by calling it "Maybe in your fúcked up world it's normal find men attractive and want to them suck off but not mine."

            To me gay is not an insult as there is nothing wrong with it. You seem to think so which again is phobic. And defensive.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by letsgochump View Post

              No its really not about world view. EU troops have ever done operations that my dad's volley ball team could have accomplished. NATO is the military alliance here. Anyway, are you saying that Russia should be afraid of the EU militarily?

              It's not a spin to Condoleezza and many other US politicians knew Russia was a pos kleptocracy. They've been saying it as long as I can remember.

              The bulk of your text is just repeating how bad my reading comprehension is but even when you're going back and rereading my comment you still misunderstand. I was answering to this "if you think private corporations should be actively controlling the governance of the Ukraine or any country for that matter then okay". Meaning I don't think private corporations should be controlling the governance of Ukraine. I never said I agree that this is what Blackrock is doing. Do you think before you type? Or after?

              I did address this point. The statement means nothing.

              You dodged again. Do you believe in the globalist agenda for world power or not?

              Who is reliable source is not Main****** Media?

              I said that it was normal for people to do ***ual services for gain is ***ually frustrated places like prisons etc. You responded to that by calling it "Maybe in your fúcked up world it's normal find men attractive and want to them suck off but not mine."

              To me gay is not an insult as there is nothing wrong with it. You seem to think so which again is phobic. And defensive.
              1. It's self evident they should be, are you ****** or something by the very nature of them being part of NATO they've got something to be "afraid of" as I said self evident and if you don't think the likes of France, Germany and the UK could deal with Russia if they choose to you're in denial and have very elitist Americanised view of the world, which honestly isn't very surprising...

              2. Yes it is a spin, Condolezza didn't even say anything you mentioned so yes it's BS as I said you've spun it to fit your narrative, she or another politician may have said it at one point but not in the EXACT context we're discussing currently .

              3. Blackrock literally on their on site about their "envisioned setup, structure, mandate and governance" in relation to the Ukraine so clearly you're literally not thinking before you type, I swear stop licking windows for a moment and engage what little brain you do have....

              4. No I don't care about a globalist agenda, nor do I think there is one I thought that was self evident again, you really are slow on the uptake son....

              5. if the subjective MSM and it's sensationalism​,biased or emotionally loaded impressions of events rather than neutrality and the objective truth is what you want as your main source of information then that's you.

              But i'd rather compile multiple sources of information from all sides of "the argument" and make a judgement based on said information than following MSM like a lamb to the slaughter.

              6. been to prison, never done anything of the sort because it's not normal, you either live a very sheltered life with your mommy and watch too many show/movies were they sell that idea to you or like I said in your world it is "normal" because you bat for both sides but not for people who're wired correctly.

              And clearly you're lying about gay not being an insult for you or you wouldn't repeatedly be trying to use it "against me" unprovoked since your first response to me...

              Someone who doesn't find a word offensive wouldn't using said word repeatedly to try and offend, again though maybe your struggle to comprehend this concept as well.
              Last edited by Boro; 02-28-2023, 03:07 PM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Boro View Post

                1. It's self evident they should be, are you ****** or something by the very nature of them being part of NATO they've got something to be "afraid of" as I said self evident and if you don't think the likes of France, Germany and the UK could deal with Russia if they choose to you're in denial and have very elitist Americanised view of the world, which honestly isn't very surprising...

                2. Yes it is a spin, Condolezza didn't even say anything you mentioned so yes it's BS as I said you've spun it to fit your narrative, she or another politician may have said it at one point but not in the EXACT context we're discussing currently .

                3. Blackrock literally on their on site about their "envisioned setup, structure, mandate and governance" in relation to the Ukraine so clearly you're literally not thinking before you type, I swear stop licking windows for a moment and engage what little brain you do have....

                4. No I don't care about a globalist agenda, nor do I think there is one I thought that was self evident again, you really are slow on the uptake son....

                5. if the subjective MSM and it's sensationalism​,biased or emotionally loaded impressions of events rather than neutrality and the objective truth is what you want as your main source of information then that's you.

                But i'd rather compile multiple sources of information from all sides of "the argument" and make a judgement based on said information than following MSM like a lamb to the slaughter.

                6. been to prison, never done anything of the sort because it's not normal, you either live a very sheltered life with your mommy and watch too many show/movies were they sell that idea to you or like I said in your world it is "normal" because you bat for both sides but not for people who're wired correctly.

                And clearly you're lying about gay not being an insult for you or you wouldn't repeatedly be trying to use it "against me" unprovoked since your first response to me...

                Someone who doesn't find a word offensive wouldn't using said word repeatedly to try and offend, again though maybe your struggle to comprehend this concept as well.
                1. mixing NATO and EU now. And no, they cannot "deal with" Russia if they choose to bcs Russia has nuclear weapons. No one can "deal with" other countries now bcs of that. How do you not know that?

                2. This speech didn't mention what I said but if you have followed politics a bit longer you're aware of the context. To you ofc the context is the enemy so I get it.

                3. Yeah, the country is devastated. You cannot just take one word and conclude Blackrock wants governance over Ukrainian people. "BlackRock FMA will provide advisory support for designing an investment framework, with a goal of creating opportunities for both public and private investors to participate in the future reconstruction and recovery of the Ukrainian economy." They're investors so that's what they do. Stop scandalizing.

                4. No it's just that you really suck at giving clear and precise answers to clear and precise questions. But good, that's progress. Do you also think the earth is round?

                5. What are the multiple sources? MSM is bad so who is a good source?

                6. Good for you. You're really convincing. However what I said is true and it isn't based on movies. It's called situational ho mo ***uality. It's not an insult but I'm sorry if you're offended by my logical conclusion. I know these days logic is often considered offensive.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by letsgochump View Post

                  1. mixing NATO and EU now. And no, they cannot "deal with" Russia if they choose to bcs Russia has nuclear weapons. No one can "deal with" other countries now bcs of that. How do you not know that?

                  2. This speech didn't mention what I said but if you have followed politics a bit longer you're aware of the context. To you ofc the context is the enemy so I get it.

                  3. Yeah, the country is devastated. You cannot just take one word and conclude Blackrock wants governance over Ukrainian people. "BlackRock FMA will provide advisory support for designing an investment framework, with a goal of creating opportunities for both public and private investors to participate in the future reconstruction and recovery of the Ukrainian economy." They're investors so that's what they do. Stop scandalizing.

                  4. No it's just that you really suck at giving clear and precise answers to clear and precise questions. But good, that's progress. Do you also think the earth is round?

                  5. What are the multiple sources? MSM is bad so who is a good source?

                  6. Good for you. You're really convincing. However what I said is true and it isn't based on movies. It's called situational ho mo ***uality. It's not an insult but I'm sorry if you're offended by my logical conclusion. I know these days logic is often considered offensive.
                  1. Of course I know they've nuke so does France and the UK what's your point? they're not got to instantly going to want their own mutual annihilation, you simpleton...

                  2. No context is the enemy you imbecile, you're the strips context from everything and adds your own spin so it's laughable you audacity to say that.

                  3. As I said Blackrock intends to manage "setup, structure, mandate and governance" of the Ukraine.

                  And as I said to multiple times already, not only are they intending to use Ukraine as a test bed for CBDCs and the likes and they've already stuck up deals with various governments and private entíties to ensure if their "digital" future is a success the aforementioned governments and corporations are set to reap greater benefits than the inhabitants of the Ukraine.

                  4. This is a real question, are you rétard?

                  I've told you I travel all over the world for work... a globalist agenda is to my benefit, I didn't think I needed to clarify that and now you're asking rhetorical questions...

                  5. I've told you already going to the ACTUAL source it's self like - blackrock, IMF, WEF, Digital 4 freedom, Ukraine Recovery Conference​ and their multiple resources from there, it doesn't take genius to work out, rather than a sensationalist version of the alleged "truth" from the media and do a little research yourself on the information...

                  6. What am i trying to convince you of?

                  What's logical about you wanting to nosh men off? you werido... trying to justify being a fairy because the situation "permitted" is beyond laughable...
                  Last edited by Boro; 03-01-2023, 06:27 AM.

                  Comment


                  • Political situation and on going war in Ukraine aside...

                    It all comes down to how the Olympics committee/board off directors feel about it...

                    it would be naďve to think some off them would not be swayed by a generous donation or sponsorships from Russian businesses or government officials..

                    that being said they could probably even put politics aside and assume a neutral position as to whether they allow or ban Russian athletes from participating..

                    Wladimir has his case given what is going on in his home country currently so his protests or objections will hold some sway given him being a famous former heavyweight champion could put pressure on the Olympics to do a boycott.....or alternatively it could be noted but ignored and business is conducted as per usual..

                    I mean hell in sports events sometimes despite public opinion or backlash etc the hosts still go ahead with what they want to do from time to time as they don't want to lose out on the revenue they will generate in the bigger picture..

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by BritishBoxing92 View Post
                      Political situation and on going war in Ukraine aside...

                      It all comes down to how the Olympics committee/board off directors feel about it...

                      it would be naďve to think some off them would not be swayed by a generous donation or sponsorships from Russian businesses or government officials..

                      that being said they could probably even put politics aside and assume a neutral position as to whether they allow or ban Russian athletes from participating..

                      Wladimir has his case given what is going on in his home country currently so his protests or objections will hold some sway given him being a famous former heavyweight champion could put pressure on the Olympics to do a boycott.....or alternatively it could be noted but ignored and business is conducted as per usual..

                      I mean hell in sports events sometimes despite public opinion or backlash etc the hosts still go ahead with what they want to do from time to time as they don't want to lose out on the revenue they will generate in the bigger picture..
                      Ultimately Wlads little rant could all be for naught, boxing may disappear from the Olympics entirely...

                      Olympic boxing already faces an existential threat which could leave them out of the Olympics in 2028 and ultimately for good, Wlad doesn't need to be adding anymore fuel to that fire with his hypocritical proselytising...

                      Truthfully though athletes shouldn't suffer for the actions of their leader, regardless of how de****able people have the audacity to decides he is from their proverbial glass house.
                      Last edited by Boro; 03-01-2023, 11:35 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP