Originally posted by Boro
View Post
You look at a very small sample of circumstantial evidence and draw laughably idiotic conclusions from that.
I already explained this to you but you were too busy drooling over pictures of ***** to pay attention I guess.
Each and every example you gave have a more common sense explanation.
The reason the countries near Russia want to join Nato is Russia. Russia is an unreliable totalitarian country with a militaristic culture that has been rewriting history for decades now to suit this idea of Russia as a great power and being in the right. They are building a narrative that the Western values are evil and Russia is the only thing standing in the way of collapse of family and freedom. This is propaganda aimed to justify war as we now see. At least everyone with a brain sees. Ukraine wanted to join Nato not to provoke Russia but because they were scared of the Russian invasion. You would feel less safe even with your mom around if you lived next to the Russian border.
So this is why the countries feel the best way to defend their country is joining NATO as they cannot rely on anyone else and alone their military is not comparable to Russia.
EU is not a military union so it poses literally no threat to Russia. EU has in fact been foolishly friendly toward Russia considering the constantly hostile rhetoric from *****.
Condoleezza was right in hindsight and US has great intelligence on Russian plans as shown when they told the world beforehand to the minute when Russia was going to attack. US has been aware and warning EU about the Russian threat. The fact that Condoleezza was aware that Russia cannot be trusted is again not proof of anything besides that she was aware of the threat. That's it.
Nord ****** 2 was a way to try keep EU dependent on Russian gas while Russia keeps pushing their aggressive policies little by little. It never should have been built. The corrupt parties involved in pushing for the deal in Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Estonia and Finland should be jailed for treason.
The point about Blackrock etc. is just a basic set of countries and companies doing their thing. Everyone is offering help to Ukraine and this is not proof of anything else. Why do you think UK wants to take away Ukrainian rights? Can you really not hear the Russian propaganda in your own words? If not then you're just hopelessly delusional.
You're the one fanboying over Putler. Not me. You are the one who for some reason is refusing to see anything besides the Russian troll point of view and for what reason? You haven't explained. So the simples explanation is that you really like *****. Plus your over acted ****phobia is typical for people who are insecure about their own ***uality.
So the president of Russia is a pawn because American tease him. Lmao. This is honestly the weakest distraction I have ever seen and obviously you don't believe that even yourself.
Russia is the criminal here. Not WEF, EU, NATO, Blackrock, the globalists, NWO, Illuminati, Free Masons, Aliens or Lizards anymore than the Easter Bunny or Uncle Scrooge. We can see that Russia is killing and destroying Ukraine and yet you're here making excuses and blaming others. If this were a trial your case is like "sure we have confirmed legit video evidence of Vladimir murdering Tanya but hey this businessman Joe was in the area as well and he has a lot of money so he could have paid people to brainwash Vladimir so he kills Tanya so that Vladimir's workmates can be put on surveillance by his tech company so ya'll are ****** if you don't see that Joe is the guilty here!"
Your entire position is the textbook example of the Way Of The Tinfoil: assume your conspiracy narrative is true and find whatever evidence that supports it and fill in the gaps. This is literally you.
image.png
Now keep going if you want but the more you try to bring to the table the less good it looks for you. Or just do as you tinfoils do and throw some insults and flee. Either way is fine with me and it proves my point all the same.
Comment