Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford Shreds Spence's Resume: You Not The Head Honcho!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by BlackRobb View Post

    77 year old Ugas who already lost 3 or 4 times before he fought Spence, 3 of those losses to Amir Iman and two cab drivers from Mexicali? I laugh hard at how you guys make Ugas out to be some sort of killer. Dude ****** so bad, he quit the sport for two years.
    He had losses earlier in his career. So did Pacquiao.

    Fact is he beat Porter (who is arguably Dud Crawford's best win) but got robbed.

    Spence's resume is simply better than Dud's.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

      He had losses earlier in his career. So did Pacquiao.

      Fact is he beat Porter (who is arguably Dud Crawford's best win) but got robbed.

      Spence's resume is simply better than Dud's.
      He also beat Crawford in the amateurs, Ugas is a tough guy and a quality fighter, most would have quit to the punishment Errol gave him that night.

      Comment


      • #63
        I like Crawford, but his resume at 147 is pretty light too. Pot, meet kettle? Just fight each other already, and then fight Ortiz and Boots. Honestly, whichever of those 4 fights the most of the other 3 will have the best resume. Crawford could skip Spence and fight Boots, Ortiz, and Stanionis, and be the absolute top dog no questions asked if he beats them all. Avanesyan? GTFO.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
          ———
          You love that he shoots down both Brook and Porter for Spence while he himself goes and fights both of them while they are both coming off defeats.
          Wow!!

          I know there are crazy fanboys here but man!! Yours is on a whole different spectrum
          Brook and Porter weren't coming off defeats when Crawford fought them. That was in fact Spence who did that. Brook coming off the Golovkin defeat. Porter coming off the Ugas defeat but the robbery came into play. Then Spence went and lost to Porter, but he then got the gift.

          I accept Spence fought better versions of those two fighters. But it was Spence fighting them straight after defeats.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by MexicanFistology View Post
            Terrence , go look at your own resume. You unified the 140 pound division when it was the weakest at the time. You beat Julius Indongo ffs lol Your biggest names are old washed up over the hill ex champions like kell brook and amir khan and shawn porter. And now look at you next joke opponent David Avenysyan who has beaten nobody ever and is not even top 100 p4p . At least Errol Spence beat Shawn Porter and Kell brook when they were champions and in their prime. Youre a joke and whoever believes you’re the #1 p4p is also a joke
            Brook wasn't close to prime being in that condition. It was the worst version of him until Crawford fought an even more drained Brook.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

              GGG broke his orbital but kell was winning that fight. Spence went to england to take the IBF off him in his home town against an at the time undefeated at the weight kell Brook who was the man he had already beat Porter and was #1 at WW. Spence took his soul in career best performance till the Ugas fight. Dud is fight bumvensyan. It’s a joke. He won’t go near Spence ugas boots ennis vergil ortiz? Ok I’m supposed to believe avensyan is the best they could come up with? He’s angling to fight broner on his little no name streaming service. Duds a joke at this point. Everyone in boxing is laughing at him
              Making weight for Kell cost him the fight in the second half. He was just too lethargic to continue what he did in the first half by that point. Spence had nothing to do with it.

              If not winning a single round in the first half and relying on them being done in the second half due to weight making is someone's best performance... I'd hate to see their worst. And that's not including Brook coming off a stoppage defeat and having a serious injury to his orbital. It's about as bad as it gets for any fighter going into a fight being under those circumstances.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by BlackRobb View Post

                If that's what you tell yourself to sleep better at night. Crawford destroys ANY version of Khan and Brook on either side of the ocean. Btw, when are those Spence-Thurman tickets going on sale? LOL!!!
                Brook in his prime beats both Spence and Crawford. Hell, a shot and badly drained Brook won all 3 of the completed rounds when he fought Crawford. It was only due to his punch resistance being shot due to draining that Crawford got him out of there.

                I also don't know about Khan either. It depends on his discipline. If he's disciplined, his fast hands are catching Crawford non-stop and winning wide on points. Crawford is far too cautious in there for me. He was getting lit up by a Featherweight in Gambo and was genuinely wobbled. He looked like shlt against Postal and had the arena booing constantly. Then he's clearly behind against a Porter who is in his last fight and already looking to retire regardless of the outcome.

                Sorry, but i don't buy it.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post

                  Yes but Bud just beat them easy, and Errol kinda struggled against Brook and Porter.

                  Ugas has done nothing except beating a shot Pacquiao, just like Horn on paper.

                  Garcia lost all of his fights at 147 and I'm convinced Bud would stop him.

                  Errol and Al want no part of Bud.
                  Spence not winning a round in the first half of the fight with Brook and getting a gift against Porter, is definitely more than a struggle.

                  However, Crawford lost the 3 completed rounds against a completely shot to pieces Brook. He struggled too when he shouldn't have.

                  Ugas beat Porter but got robbed. His win over a shot Pacquiao means nothing. He was 42 and had been out of the ring for 2 years. That's bad for a prime fighter, let alone a shot older one.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Uncle SneakyTouch View Post

                    Please quote me where I said that instead of putting words in my mouth
                    ————
                    These were your words verbatim, “Crawfords resume is still better than spencers”.

                    You are literally implying that the three guys Bud beat are so much better than Spence’s resume.

                    So, how is Bud’s resume better than Bud when you’re talking about Benavidez, Khan and Kavaliuskas?

                    It’s pretty much common sense.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
                      ————
                      These were your words verbatim, “Crawfords resume is still better than spencers”.

                      You are literally implying that the three guys Bud beat are so much better than Spence’s resume.

                      So, how is Bud’s resume better than Bud when you’re talking about Benavidez, Khan and Kavaliuskas?

                      It’s pretty much common sense.
                      Smh so dense. Buds entire resume is better than Spencer's. He's an undefeated multi division champ and all Spencer has done is beat thurmans leftovers and mediocre opposition. That simple.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP