Originally posted by Roadblock
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Crawford Shreds Spence's Resume: You Not The Head Honcho!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
Brook in his prime beats both Spence and Crawford. Hell, a shot and badly drained Brook won all 3 of the completed rounds when he fought Crawford. It was only due to his punch resistance being shot due to draining that Crawford got him out of there.
I also don't know about Khan either. It depends on his discipline. If he's disciplined, his fast hands are catching Crawford non-stop and winning wide on points. Crawford is far too cautious in there for me. He was getting lit up by a Featherweight in Gambo and was genuinely wobbled. He looked like shlt against Postal and had the arena booing constantly. Then he's clearly behind against a Porter who is in his last fight and already looking to retire regardless of the outcome.
Sorry, but i don't buy it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
He had losses earlier in his career. So did Pacquiao.
Fact is he beat Porter (who is arguably Dud Crawford's best win) but got robbed.
Spence's resume is simply better than Dud's.Raggamuffin likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlackRobb View Post
You are clearly delusional or on pharmaceuticals if you believe a prime Brook beats Crawford or Spence when a prime Brook barely beat Porter and got his nose smashed by the immortal Carson Jones.
Having your nose broken means what in your world? Brook still clearly beat him. Then went on to dominate and stop him in the rematch.
The worse version of Brook by that point won 5 of the first 6 rounds against Spence. The other round was a draw on my card. Spence only came into it in the second half after Brook started to get lethargic from the weight cut and having his eye socket cracked by a clash of heads. If that's what the worst version could do, then what do you think the best version does?
Crawford lost the 3 completed rounds against a completely drained and shot Brook. Yet you think he doesn't beat him in his prime? Brook controls distance much better than Crawford and has the greater timing. How the f3ck do you lose 3 rounds to that version of Brook?
It's clearly you on the pharmaceuticals. Maybe you were prescribed them for your delusion?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlackRobb View Post
The Porter fight was close, but you're just repeating LDBC talking points if you believe Ugas won clearly. The bottom line is Ugas lost three fights to cans before he even fought Spence and still lasted deep into the fight and even knocked Earl's dentures across the ring.Lmmfao…
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
Let's say Haymon did,
Why would a fighter re-sign with a promoter who DOESN'T have the names?
No Smoke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
Brook dominated Porter by winning 11 of the 12 rounds. Porter was ineffective all night. Maybe you can tell me which rounds Porter won and give me a bit of a laugh?
Having your nose broken means what in your world? Brook still clearly beat him. Then went on to dominate and stop him in the rematch.
The worse version of Brook by that point won 5 of the first 6 rounds against Spence. The other round was a draw on my card. Spence only came into it in the second half after Brook started to get lethargic from the weight cut and having his eye socket cracked by a clash of heads. If that's what the worst version could do, then what do you think the best version does?
Crawford lost the 3 completed rounds against a completely drained and shot Brook. Yet you think he doesn't beat him in his prime? Brook controls distance much better than Crawford and has the greater timing. How the f3ck do you lose 3 rounds to that version of Brook?
It's clearly you on the pharmaceuticals. Maybe you were prescribed them for your delusion?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
Brook dominated Porter by winning 11 of the 12 rounds. Porter was ineffective all night. Maybe you can tell me which rounds Porter won and give me a bit of a laugh?
Having your nose broken means what in your world? Brook still clearly beat him. Then went on to dominate and stop him in the rematch.
The worse version of Brook by that point won 5 of the first 6 rounds against Spence. The other round was a draw on my card. Spence only came into it in the second half after Brook started to get lethargic from the weight cut and having his eye socket cracked by a clash of heads. If that's what the worst version could do, then what do you think the best version does?
Crawford lost the 3 completed rounds against a completely drained and shot Brook. Yet you think he doesn't beat him in his prime? Brook controls distance much better than Crawford and has the greater timing. How the f3ck do you lose 3 rounds to that version of Brook?
It's clearly you on the pharmaceuticals. Maybe you were prescribed them for your delusion?
Comment
Comment