Pound for Pound is About SKILLS not OPPOSITION

[Mersey]

Everybody...

[PinoyZoi]

Can I have a mod in here please to remove the ones with down syndrome and only keep those with "mild ******ation" level and ABOVE intelligence..please, thanks.

Answer the question, thanks. You didnt make sense with any of your post about P4P yet you have ABOVE inteligence????? Please this isnt World of Warcraft.

[joe_black]

It's not all about skills... it's also about power! That being said, Mosley gets my vote as the top dog pound for pound!

[PRINCSHERPY]

I thing that Fulcrum is on FLOYD SR. s product!

bwahahahahaha

[Glamour Puss]

How can you know how skilled a guy is when his opposition level sucks?

Its like me dominating 7th graders in playground bball and scoring 50 a game. That doesn't make me ready for the NBA.

Skills are relative.

[PRINCSHERPY]

You are worse poster ever Fulcrum!

Hands down!

[MIP4P1]

I'm getting tired of Pacman nuthuggers hating on Floyd's recent placement back atop the P4P rankings due to the fact that he fought a guy moving up.

The fact is, by the pure definition of the term POUND FOR POUND Floyd is #1, not Pacman. Pound for Pound has nothing to do with who you fight, or who is the best at your weight division. I found it so laughable when I heard a Cotto nuthugger say that Cotto should be P4P ahead of Mayweather because Cotto has proven himself at 147 and thus is the king of 147 and Mayweather is not. Um..what the hell does 147 have to do with p4p? Absolutely nothing.
Pound for pound means that given the same size/physical advantages, the fighter rated p4p higher will always win and beat someone ranked p4p lower than him.
With that said what the hell does fighting Marquez have to do with the fact that at equal weights Floyd would demolish Pacquaio and school him even worse than he schooled JMM?
Given these obvious assertions, it is clear that Floyd Mayweather is pound for pound #1 in the world right now as he was before his retirement.

Keep in mind that who you fight has SOME bearing on it but ONLY in the sense that it gives a measurement of what your boxing ability truly is. And in the end the P4P ranking is all about BOXING ABILITY not resumes.
HOW you win a fight is more important for P4P rankings than who you fight.
I.E. going life and death with JMM twice for Pac, and easily dominating him 120-107 for Mayweather. That's the P4P difference.

That is all 100% correct!

[Fulcrum29]

Ring's latest ratings that correspond with Boxingscene's own, just shows that the average "fan" like those on this forum (i.e. YOU ******s hating in this thread) has absolutely no concept of what the POUND FOR POUND ratings actually are and what they mean.

It just goes to show that you should leave the work to the professionals, i.e. professional boxing experts not ******ed nuthuggers/haters like on here.

Most of you have no idea what p4p means as evidenced by your continuing posts on the subject that just prove how ignorant you are.

[k1t3]

How can you know how skilled a guy is when his opposition level sucks?

Its like me dominating 7th graders in playground bball and scoring 50 a game. That doesn't make me ready for the NBA.

Skills are relative.

Exactly.

[PinoyZoi]

Oh that's right you're just a bitter butthurt **** that's mad that Floyd is more popular than Pacman again.

You fking serious???? Hahahaha Floyd didnt even had 30% of the crowds in the Mayweather vs. Marquez fight, while every Pacquiao fight he has at least 60% of the fans rooting for him. Dont make me laugh rofl