Comments Thread For: Vergil Ortiz-Keith Thurman: Golden Boy Lobbies For WBC Title Eliminator

[Rebelrbg]

Thurman doesn’t even fight. Where u bn

When he fights, he wins. You might hate him, but he doesn't lose, and beat champions in their prime. Who has Ortiz beat?

[Rebelrbg]

Why does that fight AND charlo/munguia ONLY happen if its on show or fox? Thats bs and you know it.

Who has Ortiz beat to give you that confidence in him. Looking at his fights, his skillset is no where near Thurman's. He's a basic, plodding, come forward at all cost, aggressive statue, with horrible defense. Just because he's knocking out nobodies doesn't mean he will look anywhere near the same in ring with a fighter that has faced and beaten champions. Inactivity is Thurman's Achilles heel, but when he fights, he wins, especially against the style of Virgil.

[Slip jab]

No, what you're missing is Tank and Charlo are the A-side to Ryan and Mungia, even though I wish they had all fought more big names, Tank and Charlo definitely have the better resumes.

Tank A-side vs Garcia ?? Idk Garcia has defeated world class opponents something tank hadn’t done, hasn’t even faced an opponent as accomplished as Campbell. Sure he can be A-side while he gets his ass kicked in Front of his fans even his family . Kingry whooping that @**
*btw who is tanks best win?? How about his top 5 opposition?? Last 10???compare it with Garcia compare both with teo Lopez last 5

[Slip jab]

He's only lost one fight, just because he has been inactive, we forget that this was one of the most feared men in the division. I don't see anything that Ortiz has on the same level as Thurman. Keef has much better defense, footwork, power, stiff jabs, good combinations from angles, set ups and traps for the uppercuts whether inside or outside, great counters... He's just a better all around boxer than Virgil with experience against champions. I 'm not even a fan, but I find myself defending him on here often because the way people underappreciate his skillset, power, and talent.

Ok I gotcha n agree to an extent but answer this, WHEN was Thurman any good and what determines that?? He’s never bn good actually this why manny took that fight, actually a blatant cherry pick

[Slip jab]

One loss to Pacman, beat Porter in his prime, beat Garcia in his prime and he's a chump?? You really know boxing don't ya?

Although I rate both of those opponents, him not so much because he could’ve done more, he was good but he just stopped, why pac cherry picked him. Mcgregor would beat him at this point. Jake Paul has his next KO. BET!!

[Slip jab]

Who has Ortiz beat to give you that confidence in him. Looking at his fights, his skillset is no where near Thurman's. He's a basic, plodding, come forward at all cost, aggressive statue, with horrible defense. Just because he's knocking out nobodies doesn't mean he will look anywhere near the same in ring with a fighter that has faced and beaten champions. Inactivity is Thurman's Achilles heel, but when he fights, he wins, especially against the style of Virgil.

You’re thinking of RUN TIME Thurman. Even him would gas and Vergil gets to him. He’s no defensive virtuoso lol it’s lame actually. Rt there with Broner when both were pretending to be defensive geniuses

[MulaKO]

This version of Keef doesn’t stand a chance against Virgil
He’s past due