And just like that, Loma gets old overnight
Collapse
-
-
Whats wrong with acknowledging that Ortiz did have some boxing skills and athleticism? The kid was taller, and had longer arms. Don't forget that Loma also had rough spots against several of his previous opponents, none of which fought in the urban American style that Ortiz did. Young Loma would have had issues the same way had their been a tall, athletic, rangy boxer at featherweight. Loma looked so good against bums, midgets, and plodding crude guys that many of you started drinking the koolaid. He is good, a top level talent, but he would have, and always will have problems with guys his size or bigger, who can box and move with athleticism. Don't forget stiff Cambpell gave him some problems, as did Tank's son Pedraza.I didn't score the fight, too many fights to bounce around on last night, but from what I did see was a 16-0 noname nobody kicking Lomachenks ass. Those scores look wide, that kid had to have won more than 3 rounds.
Plebs saying he was rusty, he fought 10 months ago. Fighting 1x a year for a 35 year-old guy is beneficial and preferred.
Not much time left for old Lomachenki.Last edited by The Akbar One; 11-01-2022, 06:47 PM.Comment
-
Of course not, stay mad.
I am in agreement.
Whats wrong with acknowledging that Ortiz did have some boxing skills and athleticism? The kid was taller, and had longer arms. Don't forget that Loma also had rough spots against several of his previous opponents, none of which fought in the urban American style that Ortiz did. Young Loma would have had issues the same way had their been a tall, athletic, rangy boxer at featherweight. Loma looked so good against bums, midgets, and plodding crude guys that many of you started drinking the koolaid. He is good, a top level talent, but he would have, and always will have problems with guys his size or bigger, who can box and move with athleticism. Don't forget stiff Cambpell gave him some problems, as did Tank's son Pedraza.
Comment
Comment