Comments Thread For: Wilder on Joshua: 'They Made Anthony Joshua ... They Gave Him Everything'

[Jab jab boom]

Your hyper focus on trying to trash one fighter because of your personal feelings is the epitome of whining. Your yes or no rhetorical questionnaire is just another cliché example of how petty individuals on the internet seek to spin narratives by constantly complaining about reality. I appreciate the sport of boxing. People like you just relish in the media narratives and always have your panties in a bunch about who you dislike. So boxingscene feeds the trolls in a misguided attempt to appease you and their own bottom line while simultaneously harming the marketability of the sport. Criticizing my writing as if I’m a journalist in the media is completely pointless when the entire premise of why I comment on this article is to criticize boxingscene’s journalism and what fuels it. You are just fodder for the fire on both sides of the debate.

Good job captain deflection. I’m not worried about criticizing 1 fighter, it’s more a criticism of tribal fan bases who refuse to accept reality. My comments about Aj are accurate and you’re only upset because you’re one of those tribal fans that don’t like to hear the truth. That’s why you didn’t answer a single one of my questions. Move on because you have no valid point other than proving mine about certain fans being fans of specific fighters and not of the sport.

[brettWall]

Don't know why Wilder is doing this and what his point is. Why not just take the offer, fight the guy and demolish him? The guy fought Klitschko, who you avoided. Your manager said you weren't ready and you were still a baby.

[peplz]

Good job captain deflection. I’m not worried about criticizing 1 fighter, it’s more a criticism of tribal fan bases who refuse to accept reality. My comments about Aj are accurate and you’re only upset because you’re one of those tribal fans that don’t like to hear the truth. That’s why you didn’t answer a single one of my questions. Move on because you have no valid point other than proving mine about certain fans being fans of specific fighters and not of the sport.

Those were not questions. They’re called rhetorical questions. Which means they are statements disguised as questions. Whatever kind of fan I am, I would much rather be that than fodder for some media outlet’s deception and profit. You have no point of your own. You’re just happily being herded with the rest of the sheep and fodder.

[Jab jab boom]

Those were not questions. They’re called rhetorical questions. Which means they are statements disguised as questions. Whatever kind of fan I am, I would much rather be that than fodder for some media outlet’s deception and profit. You have no point of your own. You’re just happily being herded with the rest of the sheep and fodder.

They weren’t rhetorical questions you ret@rd. They were legitimate yes or no questions. You’re choosing not to answer them because you know the answer to them is yes, which effectively ends any point you think you’re trying to make. Answer the questions or f**k off.

[peplz]

They weren’t rhetorical questions you ret@rd. They were legitimate yes or no questions. You’re choosing not to answer them because you know the answer to them is yes, which effectively ends any point you think you’re trying to make. Answer the questions or f**k off.

Wow. You have the nerve to accuse someone else of getting emotional when you make comments like the one above. You obviously don’t know the meaning of a rhetorical question even though you just described it pretty well. There is no such thing as an answer to a rhetorical question no matter how much of a hissy fit you throw about it. The petty potty mouth nitpicking hater fan audience that you represent is who boxingscene is catering to with articles like these. Thats been my point from the beginning and you definitely haven’t said anything to change it. Grow up. F u c k i n g off now…

[Jab jab boom]

Wow. You have the nerve to accuse someone else of getting emotional when you make comments like the one above. You obviously don’t know the meaning of a rhetorical question even though you just described it pretty well. There is no such thing as an answer to a rhetorical question no matter how much of a hissy fit you throw about it. The petty potty mouth nitpicking hater fan audience that you represent is who boxingscene is catering to with articles like these. Thats been my point from the beginning and you definitely haven’t said anything to change it. Grow up. F u c k i n g off now…

it’s not a rhetorical question if an answer can be provided. So what’s so hard about answering if Aj was overrated? Did he receive favorable treatment because he was overrated? Etc. That’s the entire point of my original comment that got your panties in a bunch. If I’m making valid points, that you can’t counter, it’s not being a hater. That just makes you a blinded by love b***h boy who doesn’t know boxing. See I’ve given you the opportunity to actually debate boxing but you’ve proven to be incapable. So just keep sucking off Ajs nuts and leave the actual boxing talk to those of us who know the sport.

[SN!PER]

This fight NEEDS to happen because there's a real rivalry. This is the kind of fight where you don't let them get too close together at the press conferences.