Comments Thread For: Wilder on Joshua: 'They Made Anthony Joshua ... They Gave Him Everything'

[Jab jab boom]

Wow you’re complaining about an fighter’s promoter actually doing his job?! You must love it when promoters like Bob Arum trashes his own client. And what are you playing a game of “I know you are but what am I”. I say you spin so you say I spin? You don’t have you’re own points to make? The person who always is looking for the a way to trash a certain fighter has an obsession. And you use internet comment board jargon like “fan boy” because you are a cliché like Insaid from the beginning.

If you’re going to emotionally comment on a post that’s over a week old, get your grammar and spelling together so that I can properly comprehend whatever dumbass point you’re attempting to make. Try again madam.

[Toffee]

Looool and what ****ing level is the likes of Parker? His team actually turned down a Wilder fight. Laughable seeing people actually rate these guys. Same with Whyte and Takam. There was a time where people legit said Whyte would give Wilder problems. This dude comes in overweight in the bigger fight of his career and gets dogwalked by Fury. This is the talent on Joshua's resume who is above the level of anyone Wilder has fought

Yes. That's the level of fighter that is better than the guys Wilder fronted up against.

Embarrassing isn't it?

[deathofaclown]

What’s wrong with this?

It’s your teams job to maximise the amount of money you can earn and he fought plenty of decent fighters along the way.

If your promoter and network and things like that are not hyping you up, they’re not really doing a good job are they?

It did get a bit over the top with the likes of his broadcaster sky doing a poll for the top five heavyweights of all time and including him in the list of 5 lol

But yeah they carefully crafted his image, he always was media trained and a bit fake but that goes for many splitter people. And he’s just a very good fighter than the elite one they billed him as

Wilder would’ve been a much bigger star if he had a better team. An American heavyweight champ that was knocking out everyone for fun, looked the part etc. They had so much to work with and didn’t really know how to build a star.

[peplz]

If you’re going to emotionally comment on a post that’s over a week old, get your grammar and spelling together so that I can properly comprehend whatever dumbass point you’re attempting to make. Try again madam.

“Emotionally comment” “grammar and spelling” “dumbass” “madam” “fanboy”… All you do is drop cliché after cliché. Its pretty obvious that you don’t comprehend the point. You are the perfect example(aka cliché) of the reason why they still write articles with delusional Deontay Wilder quotes. All the schoolyard insults and petty diversions do is further highlight the fact.

[Jab jab boom]

“Emotionally comment” “grammar and spelling” “dumbass” “madam” “fanboy”… All you do is drop cliché after cliché. Its pretty obvious that you don’t comprehend the point. You are the perfect example(aka cliché) of the reason why they still write articles with delusional Deontay Wilder quotes. All the schoolyard insults and petty diversions do is further highlight the fact.

You haven’t stated any facts. The fact is that your grammar/spelling are atrocious and you struggle to make a valid point. I barely remember the original conversation since you’ve decided rehash a week old debate (btw which you should know is a typical female trait, assuming you’ve ever had a relationship with a woman and Aj doesn’t consume all of your attention), but if memory serves me correctly, you’re mad that I consider Joshua overrated and consider fans who couldn’t see past the hype that Hearn sold you, to be gullible fools. Just deal with it. As long as you love him, that’s all that should matter. Stop getting so bothered because my stance strikes a nerve with you. Go whine elsewhere or find a social media page for grown men with feminine emotions. Yes, another cliche that fits you perfectly.

[peplz]

You haven’t stated any facts. The fact is that your grammar/spelling are atrocious and you struggle to make a valid point. I barely remember the original conversation since you’ve decided rehash a week old debate (btw which you should know is a typical female trait, assuming you’ve ever had a relationship with a woman and Aj doesn’t consume all of your attention), but if memory serves me correctly, you’re mad that I consider Joshua overrated and consider fans who couldn’t see past the hype that Hearn sold you, to be gullible fools. Just deal with it. As long as you love him, that’s all that should matter. Stop getting so bothered because my stance strikes a nerve with you. Go whine elsewhere or find a social media page for grown men with feminine emotions. Yes, another cliche that fits you perfectly.

The point is that you are the cliché. That’s why all you do is drop cliché after cliché. And before you start making diversions about grammar and spelling you might want to spell check your own grammar. Because you can’t seem to see PASSED your own PAST failed relationships when you post about boxing. We can all be petty.

[Jab jab boom]

The point is that you are the cliché. That’s why all you do is drop cliché after cliché. And before you start making diversions about grammar and spelling you might want to spell check your own grammar. Because you can’t seem to see PASSED your own PAST failed relationships when you post about boxing. We can all be petty.

You can be petty but you’d be incorrect. You might want to look up proper usage of past vs passed. Otherwise, unless you have a boxing related point to make, you should just stfu because my stance that Aj was overrated and his fans were foolish for thinking otherwise is accurate whether it hurts your v@gina or not.

[peplz]

You can be petty but you’d be incorrect. You might want to look up proper usage of past vs passed. Otherwise, unless you have a boxing related point to make, you should just stfu because my stance that Aj was overrated and his fans were foolish for thinking otherwise is accurate whether it hurts your v@gina or not.

You are my boxing related point. Your obsession with trying to trash one fighter is my boxing related point. The finer points of grammar are a diversion from the point of how petty word games from internet cliché addicts like yourself drive the market for false narratives on the internet. You can talk about emotions, grammar, relationships and female genitalia to try to change the point all you want. But you being the most obvious cliché example of the point is the most glaring factor. By the way, you’re correct about the usage of the words past vs passed. I was incorrect. Not that hard for me to admit being wrong. But you miss the entire point of the part about being petty by continuing to even talk about that. Petty individuals with an axe to grind about “AJ” and “EJ” and “Canelo” and all the nicknames of people you don’t even know are fueling the media’s market for false narratives. And you and all of your kindergarten hysteria epitomize the sheepish behavior that characterizes that foolish fuel.

[Jab jab boom]

You are my boxing related point. Your obsession with trying to trash one fighter is my boxing related point. The finer points of grammar are a diversion from the point of how petty word games from internet cliché addicts like yourself drive the market for false narratives on the internet. You can talk about emotions, grammar, relationships and female genitalia to try to change the point all you want. But you being the most obvious cliché example of the point is the most glaring factor. By the way, you’re correct about the usage of the words past vs passed. I was incorrect. Not that hard for me to admit being wrong. But you miss the entire point of the part about being petty by continuing to even talk about that. Petty individuals with an axe to grind about “AJ” and “EJ” and “Canelo” and all the nicknames of people you don’t even know are fueling the media’s market for false narratives. And you and all of your kindergarten hysteria epitomize the sheepish behavior that characterizes that foolish fuel.

Your entire post above is nothing more than a whiney rant. Was Aj overrated by his fan base? Yes or no? Did he receive favorable treatment as a result of being overrated while all along only beating mediocre opposition? Yes or no? Has he lost 3 of his last 5 fights? Yes or no? Was he favored to beat those 2 guys he lost to? Yes or no? See, in this entire back and forth, you’re the one deflecting mainly because you don’t like what I have to say, yet you can’t disprove anything that I say and all you do is respond with whiney and poorly written nonsense……a full week later.

[peplz]

Your entire post above is nothing more than a whiney rant. Was Aj overrated by his fan base? Yes or no? Did he receive favorable treatment as a result of being overrated while all along only beating mediocre opposition? Yes or no? Has he lost 3 of his last 5 fights? Yes or no? Was he favored to beat those 2 guys he lost to? Yes or no? See, in this entire back and forth, you’re the one deflecting mainly because you don’t like what I have to say, yet you can’t disprove anything that I say and all you do is respond with whiney and poorly written nonsense……a full week later.

Your hyper focus on trying to trash one fighter because of your personal feelings is the epitome of whining. Your yes or no rhetorical questionnaire is just another cliché example of how petty individuals on the internet seek to spin narratives by constantly complaining about reality. I appreciate the sport of boxing. People like you just relish in the media narratives and always have your panties in a bunch about who you dislike. So boxingscene feeds the trolls in a misguided attempt to appease you and their own bottom line while simultaneously harming the marketability of the sport. Criticizing my writing as if I’m a journalist in the media is completely pointless when the entire premise of why I comment on this article is to criticize boxingscene’s journalism and what fuels it. You are just fodder for the fire on both sides of the debate.